<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HARRY&#8217;S GAL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:21:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39272</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39272</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Media digs and Miers cons. credentials start to ..&lt;/strong&gt;

Ladies and gents, after a day where many conservatives (including me) wondered just what the heck he was doing, methinks the President may have very well delivered on giving us a conservative nominee - if the stories coming out about her are any indi...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Media digs and Miers cons. credentials start to ..</strong></p>
<p>Ladies and gents, after a day where many conservatives (including me) wondered just what the heck he was doing, methinks the President may have very well delivered on giving us a conservative nominee &#8211; if the stories coming out about her are any indi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39271</link>
		<dc:creator>Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39271</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;But we wanted to Kill them!&quot; Conservative Post Tr&lt;/strong&gt;

Watching the day two moaning and growning on the &quot;Billy Goat&quot; Right about the SCOTUS pick of Harriet Miers, I was struck by the arrogance - not of the President, but from the hard right itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;But we wanted to Kill them!&#8221; Conservative Post Tr</strong></p>
<p>Watching the day two moaning and growning on the &#8220;Billy Goat&#8221; Right about the SCOTUS pick of Harriet Miers, I was struck by the arrogance &#8211; not of the President, but from the hard right itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Hedgehog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39270</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Hedgehog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39270</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I want to be Harry&#039;s GIRL.&lt;/strong&gt;

YIKES. From ProfessorBainbridge.com by way of Michelle Malkin. While Hugh Hewitt may be defending Bush&#039;s pick, most of the conservative voices I have learned to trust view this as a DISASTER.You don&#039;t take a Saturday Night Special to an artillery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I want to be Harry&#8217;s GIRL.</strong></p>
<p>YIKES. From ProfessorBainbridge.com by way of Michelle Malkin. While Hugh Hewitt may be defending Bush&#8217;s pick, most of the conservative voices I have learned to trust view this as a DISASTER.You don&#8217;t take a Saturday Night Special to an artillery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oblogatory Anecdotes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39269</link>
		<dc:creator>Oblogatory Anecdotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39269</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Call Me A Bush Crony Anytime!&lt;/strong&gt;

Bill Clinton had the FOB&#039;s (Friends of Bill). I never recall anyone in the press ever referring to them as &quot;cronies&quot;? I would much rather be a Bush crony than a Friend of Bill any day. FOB&#039;s tended to be found face down in Fort Marcy Park and other d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Call Me A Bush Crony Anytime!</strong></p>
<p>Bill Clinton had the FOB&#8217;s (Friends of Bill). I never recall anyone in the press ever referring to them as &#8220;cronies&#8221;? I would much rather be a Bush crony than a Friend of Bill any day. FOB&#8217;s tended to be found face down in Fort Marcy Park and other d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rant Fever</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rant Fever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39268</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Bottom Line on Harriet Miers&lt;/strong&gt;

A lot of people on both sides of the political aisle are openly wondering why Bush chose to nominate Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.  She has never been a judge before and her experience with the key issues and national politics is laking.  

The...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Bottom Line on Harriet Miers</strong></p>
<p>A lot of people on both sides of the political aisle are openly wondering why Bush chose to nominate Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.  She has never been a judge before and her experience with the key issues and national politics is laking.  </p>
<p>The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision '08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39267</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39267</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Miers, Miers, We Got More Miers!&lt;/strong&gt;

Wow, there is a lot more good stuff out there on this nomination than with Roberts - it seems Roberts was so good, people couldn&#8217;t really get too fired up on either side, a sentiment echoed in the latest installment of The Hotline&#8217;s Blogom...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Miers, Miers, We Got More Miers!</strong></p>
<p>Wow, there is a lot more good stuff out there on this nomination than with Roberts &#8211; it seems Roberts was so good, people couldn&#8217;t really get too fired up on either side, a sentiment echoed in the latest installment of The Hotline&#8217;s Blogom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyscience</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39266</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39266</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mixed Reactions for Miers</strong></p>
<p>Chris Cillizza did an interesting survey of U.S. Senators that are up for re-election in 2006. He polled 10 Senators â€“ five Democrats, five Republicans â€“ to determine their reaction to the Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination. Unlike the Robertsâ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39265</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Harriet Miers Watch: Miers Qualified to Be on Top Court&lt;/strong&gt;

White House Counsel Harriet Miers sits in the Oval Office as President George W. Bush talks on the phone in the background in Washington in this July 1, 2005 file photo. U.S. President George W. Bush on Monday reached into his inner circle and nominat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Harriet Miers Watch: Miers Qualified to Be on Top Court</strong></p>
<p>White House Counsel Harriet Miers sits in the Oval Office as President George W. Bush talks on the phone in the background in Washington in this July 1, 2005 file photo. U.S. President George W. Bush on Monday reached into his inner circle and nominat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/04/harrys-gal/comment-page-1/#comment-39264</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3266#comment-39264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keep Your Powder Dry&lt;/strong&gt;

At what point will our side of the blogosphere realize that the goal of a nominee isn&#039;t to have a philosophical fight during the nomination process, but to win the philosophical fight in the Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keep Your Powder Dry</strong></p>
<p>At what point will our side of the blogosphere realize that the goal of a nominee isn&#8217;t to have a philosophical fight during the nomination process, but to win the philosophical fight in the Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
