<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHITEWASHING CHUCKAQUIDDICK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:28:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-39367</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3276#comment-39367</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NY Times Finally Covers Schumer Scandal&lt;/strong&gt;

The NY Times has been ignoring a scandal in its own backyard involving NY Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer&#039;s office. Other local papers like the NY Post, as well as out of town papers like the Washington Post have covered the story. The NY Times had to...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NY Times Finally Covers Schumer Scandal</strong></p>
<p>The NY Times has been ignoring a scandal in its own backyard involving NY Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer&#8217;s office. Other local papers like the NY Post, as well as out of town papers like the Washington Post have covered the story. The NY Times had to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Relevant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-39366</link>
		<dc:creator>B Relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3276#comment-39366</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Page 20?!</strong></p>
<p>Well the New York Times has finally gotten around to covering the illegally obtained credit report of Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele—a Republican—by two researchers at the Chuck Schumer-led Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. The incident fir&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strange Women Lying in Ponds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-39365</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange Women Lying in Ponds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3276#comment-39365</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another NY Times Whitewash&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#039;s the strategy of the liberal MSM in a nutshell: If a Democrat does something wrong, bizarre, criminal, or inexplicable, ignore it. If ignoring it doesn&#039;t work, find a way to spin it against the Republicans. I&#039;d say that this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another NY Times Whitewash</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the strategy of the liberal MSM in a nutshell: If a Democrat does something wrong, bizarre, criminal, or inexplicable, ignore it. If ignoring it doesn&#8217;t work, find a way to spin it against the Republicans. I&#8217;d say that this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-39364</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3276#comment-39364</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The NY Times catches up on Chucky, sorta&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;

After ignoring the story for weeks, the NY Times has finally spent some precious ink informing its readers about the lawbreaking misadventures of Chuck Schumer&#039;s staff and their prying into the privacy of potential GOP Senate candidates. From the story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The NY Times catches up on Chucky, sorta&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>After ignoring the story for weeks, the NY Times has finally spent some precious ink informing its readers about the lawbreaking misadventures of Chuck Schumer&#8217;s staff and their prying into the privacy of potential GOP Senate candidates. From the story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Agenda</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/06/whitewashing-chuckaquiddick/comment-page-1/#comment-39363</link>
		<dc:creator>No Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3276#comment-39363</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who&#039;s Paying The Bill?&lt;/strong&gt;

While the media focuses solely on Tom DeLay&#039;s indictment, the dark ethical cloud over Chuck Schumer and the DSCC still goes virtually unnoticed. Newsday, however, is following the story... The two women at the center of the FBI probe [DSCC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who&#8217;s Paying The Bill?</strong></p>
<p>While the media focuses solely on Tom DeLay&#8217;s indictment, the dark ethical cloud over Chuck Schumer and the DSCC still goes virtually unnoticed. Newsday, however, is following the story&#8230; The two women at the center of the FBI probe [DSCC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
