<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA TODAY REMOVES DOCTORED PHOTO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40610</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40610</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Demonizing Condi&lt;/strong&gt;

Condoleezza Rice is a demon. Halloween is Monday so USA Today decided to alter her photo in the October 19th online edition. The photo has since been changed on the website, but others including Michelle Malkin saved the evidence. This is USA Today&#039;s v...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Demonizing Condi</strong></p>
<p>Condoleezza Rice is a demon. Halloween is Monday so USA Today decided to alter her photo in the October 19th online edition. The photo has since been changed on the website, but others including Michelle Malkin saved the evidence. This is USA Today&#8217;s v&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40609</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40609</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Today Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here&lt;/strong&gt;

A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here</strong></p>
<p>A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paxety Pages</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40608</link>
		<dc:creator>Paxety Pages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Night of the Living Condi&lt;/strong&gt;

Mahone Dunbar has a fantesy interview with the unnamed photo editor - and posts the unpublished photos of the demon Condi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Night of the Living Condi</strong></p>
<p>Mahone Dunbar has a fantesy interview with the unnamed photo editor &#8211; and posts the unpublished photos of the demon Condi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pardon My English: Conservative News &#38; Opinion</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40607</link>
		<dc:creator>Pardon My English: Conservative News &#38; Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40607</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Today Caught &#039;Photoshop-ing&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;

It looks like yet another member of mainstream media has been caught &#039;Photoshop-ing.&#039; Last week, USA Today doctored a photo of Condoleezza Rice, giving a demonic look about her. Michelle Malkin is keeping tabs on this story here and here....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today Caught &#8216;Photoshop-ing&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>It looks like yet another member of mainstream media has been caught &#8216;Photoshop-ing.&#8217; Last week, USA Today doctored a photo of Condoleezza Rice, giving a demonic look about her. Michelle Malkin is keeping tabs on this story here and here&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two crackas in my soup...</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40606</link>
		<dc:creator>Two crackas in my soup...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40606</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jeepers Creepers&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin and other bloggers have landed on this one with both feet. This cracka just got over a bad sinus infection and is late getting to the stomp. As for that other one, Cracka Jack, well, who knows. Probably got into the anti-freeze again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeepers Creepers</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin and other bloggers have landed on this one with both feet. This cracka just got over a bad sinus infection and is late getting to the stomp. As for that other one, Cracka Jack, well, who knows. Probably got into the anti-freeze again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel in Brookline</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40605</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel in Brookline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40605</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Condi Rice and Mystique: Separated At Birth?&lt;/strong&gt;

Presumably, someone did this as a joke -- and either left it in until it was too late, or else thought no one would notice. This does no good to USA Today&#039;s reputation either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Condi Rice and Mystique: Separated At Birth?</strong></p>
<p>Presumably, someone did this as a joke &#8212; and either left it in until it was too late, or else thought no one would notice. This does no good to USA Today&#8217;s reputation either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopstories</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40604</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopstories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40604</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Black faces&lt;/strong&gt;

Speaking of racial issues, what is up with the bad media habit of digitally altering the photos of black people? Time got busted for doing it with OJ. And now USA Today got busted for altering a photo of Condi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Black faces</strong></p>
<p>Speaking of racial issues, what is up with the bad media habit of digitally altering the photos of black people? Time got busted for doing it with OJ. And now USA Today got busted for altering a photo of Condi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Satire Fake News -                The Nose On Your Face</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40603</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Satire Fake News -                The Nose On Your Face</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Today Makes Amends, Publishes Real Condi Pic&lt;/strong&gt;

After receiving multitudinous complaints over their posting of a retouched picture of Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice that made her appear somewhat demonic, USA Today removed the photo from their website and added this note from the editor:Editor&#039;s ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today Makes Amends, Publishes Real Condi Pic</strong></p>
<p>After receiving multitudinous complaints over their posting of a retouched picture of Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice that made her appear somewhat demonic, USA Today removed the photo from their website and added this note from the editor:Editor&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40602</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40602</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here&lt;/strong&gt;

A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here</strong></p>
<p>A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40601</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40601</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here&lt;/strong&gt;

A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here</strong></p>
<p>A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confederate Yankee</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40600</link>
		<dc:creator>Confederate Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40600</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Slitting Their Wrists With Occam&#8217;s Razor</strong></p>
<p>In response to this morning&#8217;s post on photo ethics at USA Today, USA Today Vice President and Editor-in-Chief Kinsey Wilson dropped by this humble blog and left the following comment: I’d like to explain how that happened. USATODAY.com, like other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth Be Told</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40599</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Be Told</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40599</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Menacing Condaleeza Rice....&lt;/strong&gt;

Lashawn Barber links to Bucktowndusty who exposed USA Today for doctoring a photo of Condaleeza Rice by making her look more menacing. Bucktowndusty even goes further using two images of O.J. Simpson, a before and after shot where in the after shot he ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Menacing Condaleeza Rice&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Lashawn Barber links to Bucktowndusty who exposed USA Today for doctoring a photo of Condaleeza Rice by making her look more menacing. Bucktowndusty even goes further using two images of O.J. Simpson, a before and after shot where in the after shot he &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhymes With Right</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40598</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhymes With Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40598</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Racists Alter Photos Of Prominent Black Republicans -- Race Hos Silent&lt;/strong&gt;

Why is it that a liberal blogger and a liberal newspaper both published altered photos of prominent black Republicans designed to play upon the lowest of racist stereotypes? Could it be a bit of racist intolerance for those who dared...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Racists Alter Photos Of Prominent Black Republicans &#8212; Race Hos Silent</strong></p>
<p>Why is it that a liberal blogger and a liberal newspaper both published altered photos of prominent black Republicans designed to play upon the lowest of racist stereotypes? Could it be a bit of racist intolerance for those who dared&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkYardBlog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40597</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkYardBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40597</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just in Time for Halloween&lt;/strong&gt;

USA Today demon-eyezes Condi Rice. I have to concur with the other Photoshop users who have pined in on this one. I use PS a lot. A lot. And I don&#039;t see a way you get those eyes enhanced in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just in Time for Halloween</strong></p>
<p>USA Today demon-eyezes Condi Rice. I have to concur with the other Photoshop users who have pined in on this one. I use PS a lot. A lot. And I don&#8217;t see a way you get those eyes enhanced in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riding Sun</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/10/26/usa-today-removes-doctored-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40596</link>
		<dc:creator>Riding Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3367#comment-40596</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The whites of her eyes&lt;/strong&gt;

Reuters photographer Rick Wilking made headlines a few weeks ago with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The whites of her eyes</strong></p>
<p>Reuters photographer Rick Wilking made headlines a few weeks ago with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

