SAVING AMERICA FROM CROSSES

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 6, 2005 07:39 AM

Via John at Stop the ACLU comes news of a ballot measure that the civil liberties group is fighting tooth and nail:

Voters decide next week if the “City of Churches” should restore the cross to the Redlands seal.

When the American Civil Liberties Union threatened a costly lawsuit last year if the cross wasn’t eliminated, officials decided the cross must be erased from the city logo. Many residents were outraged and voters will now decide Tuesday if the religious symbol will return.

If Measure Q wins, the ACLU will likely go to court.

“This is the first time this has happened, to my knowledge,” said ACLU attorney Peter Eliasberg, who tracks crosses on seals statewide. He said it is “highly likely” a lawsuit would be filed against the city if it reinstates the cross.

“The cross is clearly unconstitutional,” Eliasberg said. “It sends a message of favor for one religion over others.”

Last year, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted to take a cross off the county’s seal under threat of a lawsuit by the ACLU.

Scott Siegel, who led the drive to put Measure Q on Tuesday’s ballot, resents that the ACLU forced the city into removing the cross from the city seal.

“What happens in this type of situation is that the ACLU threatens to sue, then the city capitulates on a cost basis, and the case is never decided on its legal merits,” he said. “The ACLU is telling us that it’s a foregone conclusion that we’re going to lose if a suit is filed. That’s just a ridiculous statement.”

Yes, the ACLU actually employs someone whose primary mission is to “track crosses on seals statewide” and eradicate them.

Here’s the ballot initiative
and city background.

More background on the ridiculous, ACLU-manufactured battle here.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Angry in the Great White North
  2. Stop The ACLU
  3. Shock and Blog
  4. Fly At Night
  5. John in Carolina
  6. Local Liberty
  7. JammedGun
  8. The Irate Nation
  9. Mistakes Were Made
  10. Eric's Boredom Revealed
  11. Right Minded
  12. Jo's Cafe
  13. amoxicilien

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

264 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 1 Trackback

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.

Saturday open thread

October 10, 2009 11:52 AM by Michelle Malkin

111 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Hardin, Montana update: Jail deal in limbo

October 6, 2009 05:41 PM by Michelle Malkin

17 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Uncategorized



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom