WILSON QUESTION’S WOODWARD’S HONESTY
Yeah, let that sink for a minute. Then read this:
“It certainly gives the appearance of a conflict of interest. He was taking an advocacy position when he was a party to it,” Wilson said.
Hm. So you can’t take an advocacy position when you’re a party to a situation. Like, say, going on a quasi fact-finding mission and reporting one thing to the CIA while reporting the exact opposite to the press?
I’ll have more to say about all of this at the JYB.
Posted in: Uncategorized
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Uncategorized
AmSpecBlog
» The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"
Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care CzarLegal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No ReidThe Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to ConclusionsLegal Insurrection
» NY Times Names NamesThe Powers That Be
» A Picture is Worth a Trillion Dollars and Lots of Lost FreedomAmerican Thinker
» The true cost of ObamaCare
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL