WILSON QUESTION’S WOODWARD’S HONESTY
Yeah, let that sink for a minute. Then read this:
“It certainly gives the appearance of a conflict of interest. He was taking an advocacy position when he was a party to it,” Wilson said.
Hm. So you can’t take an advocacy position when you’re a party to a situation. Like, say, going on a quasi fact-finding mission and reporting one thing to the CIA while reporting the exact opposite to the press?
I’ll have more to say about all of this at the JYB.
Posted in: Uncategorized
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Uncategorized
Jihad Watch
» Pakistan refuses to hand over jihadists to India
Belmont Club
» Fun with mapsTigerHawk
» Bailing out my faith in governmentJustOneMinute
» Leaving Some Running RoomHotline On Call
» Oprah To Tape In DC Inauguration WeekWeekly Standard
» Is Al Franken Winning by 22 Votes?Gateway Pundit
» 81% of Americans Oppose Card Check-- But Obama Still Supports It
Add your opinion
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL