DID ALITO DEFEND WARRANTLESS DOMESTIC SPYING?
The Associated Press is reporting that “Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department.”
Here’s how some MSM outlets are headlining the story:
“Documents Show Alito Supported Domestic Spying”
“Alito Defended Wiretap Protections in ’85 Memo”
“Supreme Court nominee defends govt. right to order domestic wiretaps”
“U.S. Supreme Court nominee Alito backed domestic wiretaps, opposed Roe: memo”
“Alito defended government wiretap rights”
Most people reading such headlines will conclude that Alito wants to give the feds the unfettered right to eavesdrop without a warrant on purely domestic phone calls–a position more extreme than that being advanced by President Bush, who has defended warrantless eavesdropping of calls between the U.S. and suspected al Qaeda operatives abroad.
But contrary to the spin, Alito has never defended warrantless domestic spying. He did say that Nixon Administration officials who ordered illegal wiretaps should be given immunity from civil lawsuits since the illegality of the wiretaps was not established at the time they were ordered. One can agree or disagree, but to characterize Alito’s position as supporting “the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps” is a reckless distortion.
The Alito memo, which most MSM outlets don’t bother to link to, can be downloaded from the National Archives web site here.
(The issue Alito was writing about grew out of an earlier case, United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 [1972]. John Hinderaker discusses that case and its implications for the current NSA controversy here.)
Update: Hinderaker skewers the AP’s report here. Ed Whelan does so here. Sen. Conryn’s office does so here.
Media Matters perpetuates AP’s distortion, falsely claiming that the memo suggests “Alito supports warrantless wiretaps.”
***
Previous:
There they go again
What liberal media? Pt. 9,999
Jimmy Massey’s lies: The AP finally wakes up
Reporting Bush’s speech… before he delivers it
AP: John McCain is “front-runner” for GOP nomination
***
Related:
The Associated Press and its sources
The Associated Press makes it up
The crowd that didn’t boo
Associated Press continues to stonewall
The Associated Press twists the truth
Another whopper from the Associated Press
The Asscociated Press spins the ISG report
How the Associated Press operates
Associated Press serves Democrats’ agenda
Associated Press spins the news
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Romney and McCain: The GOP Frenemies’ Club
January 10, 2012 09:53 PM by Michelle Malkin
219 CommentsOops (video): McCain calls Romney “President Obama”
January 7, 2012 12:05 AM by Michelle Malkin
134 CommentsJohn McCain Understands the Frustrations of ‘Occupy Wall Street’
October 12, 2011 09:07 PM by Doug Powers
122 CommentsJohn McCain Not Sorry for Reading ‘Tea Party Hobbits’ Line on Senate Floor
August 9, 2011 01:47 PM by Doug Powers
142 CommentsJulianne Moore to Portray Sarah Palin in ‘Game Change’ Movie
March 10, 2011 04:32 PM by Doug Powers
168 CommentsMcCain Still Hell-Bent to Give Obama Line Item-Style Veto, My Friends
February 9, 2011 02:11 PM by Doug Powers
60 CommentsJohn McCain: New Improved ‘Centrist’ Obama Easier to Work With, My Friends
February 4, 2011 10:50 AM by Doug Powers
106 Comments
Categories: John McCain
Babalu Blog
» Greece is Burning
Patterico
» NYT hails the safety net: Poor hardest hit
Daily Caller
» Inside Media Matters: Sources, memos reveal erratic behavior, close coordination with White House and news organizations
Nice Deb
» Former DEA Chief Tells Fox News: 3 Other Federal Agencies Knew About Operation ‘Fast and Furious’
Gateway Pundit
» Notre Dame Tells Obama: HHS Mandate Is a ‘Grave Violation of Religious Freedom and Cannot Stand’
AmSpecBlog
» Weekend Political Wrap-Up
JustOneMinute
» I Guess I'm Still Stuck On Stupid
The Hill
» Rep. Ron Paul not conceding Maine vote












See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.