About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

DID ALITO DEFEND WARRANTLESS DOMESTIC SPYING?

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 23, 2005 02:38 PM

The Associated Press is reporting that “Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department.”

Here’s how some MSM outlets are headlining the story:
“Documents Show Alito Supported Domestic Spying”
“Alito Defended Wiretap Protections in ‘85 Memo”
“Supreme Court nominee defends govt. right to order domestic wiretaps”
“U.S. Supreme Court nominee Alito backed domestic wiretaps, opposed Roe: memo”
“Alito defended government wiretap rights”

Most people reading such headlines will conclude that Alito wants to give the feds the unfettered right to eavesdrop without a warrant on purely domestic phone calls–a position more extreme than that being advanced by President Bush, who has defended warrantless eavesdropping of calls between the U.S. and suspected al Qaeda operatives abroad.

But contrary to the spin, Alito has never defended warrantless domestic spying. He did say that Nixon Administration officials who ordered illegal wiretaps should be given immunity from civil lawsuits since the illegality of the wiretaps was not established at the time they were ordered. One can agree or disagree, but to characterize Alito’s position as supporting “the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps” is a reckless distortion.

The Alito memo, which most MSM outlets don’t bother to link to, can be downloaded from the National Archives web site here.

(The issue Alito was writing about grew out of an earlier case, United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 [1972]. John Hinderaker discusses that case and its implications for the current NSA controversy here.)

Update: Hinderaker skewers the AP’s report here. Ed Whelan does so here. Sen. Conryn’s office does so here.

Media Matters perpetuates AP’s distortion, falsely claiming that the memo suggests “Alito supports warrantless wiretaps.”

***

Previous:

There they go again
What liberal media? Pt. 9,999
Jimmy Massey’s lies: The AP finally wakes up
Reporting Bush’s speech… before he delivers it
AP: John McCain is “front-runner” for GOP nomination

***

Related:

The Associated Press and its sources
The Associated Press makes it up
The crowd that didn’t boo
Associated Press continues to stonewall
The Associated Press twists the truth
Another whopper from the Associated Press
The Asscociated Press spins the ISG report
How the Associated Press operates
Associated Press serves Democrats’ agenda
Associated Press spins the news

Posted in: John McCain

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  2. Stop The ACLU
  3. The Big Green Machine
  4. Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense
  5. Stones Cry Out
  6. Stones Cry Out
  7. eamoxicilli

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Richard Viguerie responds to McCain’s new PAC

January 8, 2009 03:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

121 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Just between “friends.”

No, thanks, “my friend”

January 7, 2009 01:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

221 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

McCain wins…

November 13, 2008 09:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mandate for change.

Heckuva job, McLame

November 12, 2008 06:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

271 Comments | 19 Trackbacks

Not your friend.

The One ascends; McCain concedes

November 4, 2008 11:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

313 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

He is the change he’s been waiting for…


Categories: John McCain