THE NY TIMES VS. AMERICA
My latest column is up.
Tim Sumner at 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America concurs.
And the NYPost’s editorial, “The Gray Lady Toys with Treason,” hits the nail on the head:
Does The New York Times consider it self a law unto itself — free to subversively undercut basic efforts by any government to protect and defend its citizens?
The Times, it appears, is less concerned with promoting its dubious views on civil liberties than with undercutting the Bush administration. The end result of the paper’s flagrant irresponsibility: Lives have been put in danger on the international, national and local levels.
The ability of the nation to perform the most fundamental mission of any government — protection of its citizens — has been pointlessly compromised.
The Jayson Blair and Judith Miller fias coes were high-profile embarrass ments for The Times, but at the end of the day mostly damaged the newspaper alone.
The NSA, CIA and NYPD stories are of a different order of magnitude — they place in unnecessary danger the lives of U.S. citizens.
The New York Times — a once-great and still-powerful institution — is badly in need of adult supervision.
Preferably adults with subpoenas.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Uncategorized

TigerHawk
» Pretty and witty and gay
Hotline On Call
» Odds And Ends, A Mother-In-Law Comes To Town
Patterico
» Blagojevich Impeached


protein wisdom
» Culture of Conniption [Dan Collins]

Weekly Standard
» Another Reason to Like Dr. Sanjay
Weekly Standard
» Blago: 'Selling Senate Seats, Saving Lives, Helping People? Tomato, Tomahto, You Know?'
Power Line
» Mr. Burris Goes To Washington



Add your opinion
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL