<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times: staging the news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sierra Faith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sierra Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48292</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New York Times Fooled&lt;/strong&gt;

The American Thinker also laughs out loud at the New York Times.
More classic four layers of editing nonsense from our beloved Legacy Media.
Michelle Malkin is chuckling too.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York Times Fooled</strong></p>
<p>The American Thinker also laughs out loud at the New York Times.<br />
More classic four layers of editing nonsense from our beloved Legacy Media.<br />
Michelle Malkin is chuckling too.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betting sports</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48288</link>
		<dc:creator>betting sports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48288</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sports book betting&lt;/strong&gt;

sports betting tip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sports book betting</strong></p>
<p>sports betting tip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovastatin information 8895</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48287</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovastatin information 8895</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48287</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lovastatin information 8895&lt;/strong&gt;

1164195133 Lovastatin information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lovastatin information 8895</strong></p>
<p>1164195133 Lovastatin information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professional skin care</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48284</link>
		<dc:creator>professional skin care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48284</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;professional skin care&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;professional skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/laser_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;laser skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skin care...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>professional skin care</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">professional skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/laser_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">laser skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html" rel="nofollow">skin care&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual girls</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48281</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48281</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;virtual girls&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;virtual girls&lt;/a&gt; VG001283724</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>virtual girls</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">virtual girls</a> VG001283724</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moxicillun</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48279</link>
		<dc:creator>moxicillun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;moxicillun&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>moxicillun</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Tangents</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48277</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Tangents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keeping it real fake.  Fake photos in the news.&lt;/strong&gt;

OK.  Can anyone tell the difference between the two photos?


I  know it&#8217;s tough.  They&#8217;re both fake&#8230;.  The photograph of the &#8220;Video iPod&#8221; is a well known fake that was originally intended to be a conceptualization of the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keeping it real fake.  Fake photos in the news.</strong></p>
<p>OK.  Can anyone tell the difference between the two photos?</p>
<p>I  know it&#8217;s tough.  They&#8217;re both fake&#8230;.  The photograph of the &#8220;Video iPod&#8221; is a well known fake that was originally intended to be a conceptualization of the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EckerNet.Com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48276</link>
		<dc:creator>EckerNet.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48276</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NYT Drops Their Credibility...Again&lt;/strong&gt;

Two approaches to informing the public: Using the journalistic process including the use of editors and &quot;accountability&quot;, we get this photo from the NYT. OR A blogger uses his own earned credibility to explain why it is obviously a fake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NYT Drops Their Credibility&#8230;Again</strong></p>
<p>Two approaches to informing the public: Using the journalistic process including the use of editors and &#8220;accountability&#8221;, we get this photo from the NYT. OR A blogger uses his own earned credibility to explain why it is obviously a fake&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euphoricreality.net</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48275</link>
		<dc:creator>euphoricreality.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fact Check Is Your Friend&lt;/strong&gt;

The Ny Times has once again bowed to its agenda at the expense of its own repuation.  I can&#8217;t imagine how they think this is acceptable journalism, but trust the blogopshere to catch the glaring errors.  Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker writ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fact Check Is Your Friend</strong></p>
<p>The Ny Times has once again bowed to its agenda at the expense of its own repuation.  I can&#8217;t imagine how they think this is acceptable journalism, but trust the blogopshere to catch the glaring errors.  Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker writ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48274</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48274</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sorry NY Times, Looks Like We Made A Terrorist Kebab&lt;/strong&gt;

hat tip: Michelle Malkin You might remember that the blogosphere ripped apart the NY Times a few days ago, for clearly staging a photo for maximum heartstring pulling impact, or at the very least, stupidly running with a photo with...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sorry NY Times, Looks Like We Made A Terrorist Kebab</strong></p>
<p>hat tip: Michelle Malkin You might remember that the blogosphere ripped apart the NY Times a few days ago, for clearly staging a photo for maximum heartstring pulling impact, or at the very least, stupidly running with a photo with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Target Centermass</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48273</link>
		<dc:creator>Target Centermass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48273</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Strike Reportedly Kills al-Qaida Militants&lt;/strong&gt;

We aimed for Ayman al-Zawahiri, ranked number two in the latest al Queda polls but bouyed in the BCS by being ranked higher in some computer rankings.  We apparently missed.
	Now, the news is that it looks like we nailed some key bad guys.
	Pakistani ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Strike Reportedly Kills al-Qaida Militants</strong></p>
<p>We aimed for Ayman al-Zawahiri, ranked number two in the latest al Queda polls but bouyed in the BCS by being ranked higher in some computer rankings.  We apparently missed.<br />
	Now, the news is that it looks like we nailed some key bad guys.<br />
	Pakistani &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preaching Politics</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48272</link>
		<dc:creator>Preaching Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48272</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New York Times Fakes Photo to Hurt Bush Administra&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course anyone who does not harbor a virulent hatred of the bush administration and isn&#039;t completely ignorant of all things military (2 traits common to most liberals) might have noticed that the object in the picture is not a missle but an artille...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York Times Fakes Photo to Hurt Bush Administra</strong></p>
<p>Of course anyone who does not harbor a virulent hatred of the bush administration and isn&#8217;t completely ignorant of all things military (2 traits common to most liberals) might have noticed that the object in the picture is not a missle but an artille&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Covered In Fish</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48271</link>
		<dc:creator>People Covered In Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48271</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Media Bias? (V)&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ll break it down for you, New York Times. This is not a missile. Missiles asplode. If a missile didn&#039;t asplode, it would still be all crumpled up and in multiple little pieces, because they are made of aluminum and fiberglass.

This is an artillery...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Media Bias? (V)</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll break it down for you, New York Times. This is not a missile. Missiles asplode. If a missile didn&#8217;t asplode, it would still be all crumpled up and in multiple little pieces, because they are made of aluminum and fiberglass.</p>
<p>This is an artillery&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samurai Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48270</link>
		<dc:creator>Samurai Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48270</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Picture Speaks a Thousand Words&lt;/strong&gt;

Cheers to Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker, who posted the photo above. The photo was released on The New York Times website with a story about the failed attack on al Zawahiri that was reported on Sunday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Picture Speaks a Thousand Words</strong></p>
<p>Cheers to Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker, who posted the photo above. The photo was released on The New York Times website with a story about the failed attack on al Zawahiri that was reported on Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuru Lounge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/01/16/nytimes-staging-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-48269</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuru Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=3849#comment-48269</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Spy Agency Data After Sept. 11 Led F.B.I. to Dead Ends - New York Times&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times continues it&#039;s assault on the intelligence gathering apparatus and the administration today.

The basic gist of the article is that the entire program is worthless because FBI agents didn&#039;t recognize immediate results. Of course th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spy Agency Data After Sept. 11 Led F.B.I. to Dead Ends &#8211; New York Times</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times continues it&#8217;s assault on the intelligence gathering apparatus and the administration today.</p>
<p>The basic gist of the article is that the entire program is worthless because FBI agents didn&#8217;t recognize immediate results. Of course th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

