WHAT IS PAT LEAHY TALKING ABOUT? (VIDEO)

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 6, 2006 07:25 AM

On Face the Nation yesterday morning, Sen. Patrick Leahy added his name to the list of conspiratorial Democrats who imply that “the Bush Administration” had advance knowledge of the 9/11 terrorist attacks:

The Bush Administration knew the names of the hijackers before 9/11. They did nothing on it. I want to make sure they do it right.

leahypic.jpg

Download the video (.wmv file)

Check out Bob Schieffer’s tough follow-up:

Alright. To be continued tomorrow morning at that hearing on Capitol Hill and we’ll be back with our roundtable.

Seriously. What on earth is Leahy talking about? Was he referring to Able Danger? (And if so, how does he square his support of that data mining program with the Dems’ unhinged opposition to the NSA terrorist surveillance program?) Or was he referring to some other classified information?

Were there signs missed? Yes. Information-sharing failures? Yes. Dots unconnected? Plenty. But “Bush Knew” and “did nothing?” Leahy’s glib pandering to the Dean/McKinney faction of the Democratic Party must be challenged.

Betsy Newmark adds:

I’ve never seen that we knew the names of the hijackers before 9/11. And, of course, we didn’t know that they were hijackers until they did. And if we had known, what could we have done? Isn’t that the whole business about the Gorelick Wall that would have prevented such information from getting to authorities in time? This is also just the kind of situation that the NSA surveillance program would cover now, but wasn’t in effect before 9/11.

This is a totally irresponsible claim by Senator Leahy and I hope that the media calls him on it and asks him what he meant by that. But, I have little hope that they will.

Yup.

(Hat tip: Ian Schwartz.)

***

Reader Dan H. writes:

In addition to the one you already pointed out, he slipped in another whopper.

“Well, everybody wants to stop another attack. I mean, obviously, the Bush Administration, the first attack happened on their watch. They don’t want a second one on their watch.”

Really? That will come as a surprise to the victims of the first WTC bombings, the embassy bombings, and the USS Cole bombing. Naturally, Bob Schieffer gave him a pass on that.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Scipio the Metalcon
  2. The Strata-Sphere
  3. NoisyRoom.net
  4. Ed Driscoll.com
  5. amxiclilin

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The more offensive Newsweek photo of Sarah Palin

November 17, 2009 06:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 1 Trackback

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.


Categories: Uncategorized



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook