<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protect our ports: steam builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: best home business opportunity</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53957</link>
		<dc:creator>best home business opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53957</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;best home business opportunity&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://poslebasseina.sitesfree.com/online_home_based_business.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online home based business&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://poslebasseina.sitesfree.com/home_cleaning_business.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home cleaning business&lt;/a&gt; &#124; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>best home business opportunity</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://poslebasseina.sitesfree.com/online_home_based_business.html" rel="nofollow">online home based business</a> | <a href="http://poslebasseina.sitesfree.com/home_cleaning_business.html" rel="nofollow">home cleaning business</a> |</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sensitive skin care</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53956</link>
		<dc:creator>sensitive skin care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53956</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sensitive skin care&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skin care brands&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;professional skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/sensitive_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sens...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sensitive skin care</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html" rel="nofollow">skin care brands</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">professional skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/sensitive_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">sens&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoystory</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53955</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoystory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53955</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Port security&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#8217;s a big brouhaha on Capitol Hill and in some corners of the blogosphere over the purchase of a British company that currently manages several U.S. ports by Dubai Ports World, based in the United Arab Emirates.
Let me begin by saying that th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Port security</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a big brouhaha on Capitol Hill and in some corners of the blogosphere over the purchase of a British company that currently manages several U.S. ports by Dubai Ports World, based in the United Arab Emirates.<br />
Let me begin by saying that th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNCoRRELATED</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53954</link>
		<dc:creator>UNCoRRELATED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53954</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Less than a mountain&lt;/strong&gt;

A lot of people have been writing about the US Ports/UAE connection.  Youâ€™ll have to forgive me, but it seems to me thereâ€™s less there than meets the eye.  Yes things deserve scrutiny, but the dockworkers in the trenches are and will remain US unio...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Less than a mountain</strong></p>
<p>A lot of people have been writing about the US Ports/UAE connection.  Youâ€™ll have to forgive me, but it seems to me thereâ€™s less there than meets the eye.  Yes things deserve scrutiny, but the dockworkers in the trenches are and will remain US unio&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCS's and Gen's Place</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53953</link>
		<dc:creator>HCS's and Gen's Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53953</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It&#8217;s Official..Bush Doesn&#8217;t Care About National Security&lt;/strong&gt;

Bush Threatens to Veto Any Bill to Stop Port Takeover - New York Times
&#8220;After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward,&#8221; Mr. Bush told reporters who were traveling with him on Air Force One to Washingt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s Official..Bush Doesn&#8217;t Care About National Security</strong></p>
<p>Bush Threatens to Veto Any Bill to Stop Port Takeover &#8211; New York Times<br />
&#8220;After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward,&#8221; Mr. Bush told reporters who were traveling with him on Air Force One to Washingt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Centre of the Universe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53952</link>
		<dc:creator>The Centre of the Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53952</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;With Friends Like These...&lt;/strong&gt;

The port controversy continues to unfold with more  strange bedfellows turning up than the time the Shriners and a Furry convention  booked the same local Holliday Inn for a weekend.  Hillary Clinton and Michelle Malkin have  suddenly become soul mates,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>With Friends Like These&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The port controversy continues to unfold with more  strange bedfellows turning up than the time the Shriners and a Furry convention  booked the same local Holliday Inn for a weekend.  Hillary Clinton and Michelle Malkin have  suddenly become soul mates,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision '08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53951</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53951</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Portgate Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Washington Times: Against
	John McIntyre: Against (&#8221;[C]ommon-sense seems to tell me that we probably should not approve management of key U.S. ports to a state-owned Arab company)&#8230;

James Lileks: Against
	L.A. Times: For (&#8221;Dubai Port...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Portgate Roundup</strong></p>
<p>Washington Times: Against<br />
	John McIntyre: Against (&#8221;[C]ommon-sense seems to tell me that we probably should not approve management of key U.S. ports to a state-owned Arab company)&#8230;</p>
<p>James Lileks: Against<br />
	L.A. Times: For (&#8221;Dubai Port&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Minded</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53950</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Minded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53950</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A swift movement&lt;/strong&gt;

There appears to be bipartisan support for protecting our ports. There&#039;s more here, and Michelle Malkin tells how the port sellout was financed on her blog. (Note to GOP: Get on this bandwagon. Fast.)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A swift movement</strong></p>
<p>There appears to be bipartisan support for protecting our ports. There&#8217;s more here, and Michelle Malkin tells how the port sellout was financed on her blog. (Note to GOP: Get on this bandwagon. Fast.)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Journal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53949</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53949</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;With endorsements like this, who needs opponents?&lt;/strong&gt;

Jimmy Carter says the idea of a threat from UAE-owned U.S. ports is a fabrication. He also said the U.S. and Israel should fund Hamas....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>With endorsements like this, who needs opponents?</strong></p>
<p>Jimmy Carter says the idea of a threat from UAE-owned U.S. ports is a fabrication. He also said the U.S. and Israel should fund Hamas&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53948</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53948</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dead Man Walking</strong></p>
<p>DEAD MAN WALKING&#8230;.This whole controversy over &#8220;Portgate&#8221; — a decision by the Bush administration to allow the operations of six big U.S. ports to be managed by a company owned by the United Arab Emirates — is fascinating. Not so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53947</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53947</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dead Man Walking</strong></p>
<p>DEAD MAN WALKING&#8230;.This whole controversy over &#8220;Portgate&#8221; — a decision by the Bush administration to allow the operations of six big U.S. ports to be managed by a company owned by the United Arab Emirates — is fascinating. Not so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReidBlog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53946</link>
		<dc:creator>ReidBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53946</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pimp my ports&lt;/strong&gt;

It has happened again. George W. Bush has united left and right, Democrats and Republicans, in this country against one of his decisions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pimp my ports</strong></p>
<p>It has happened again. George W. Bush has united left and right, Democrats and Republicans, in this country against one of his decisions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53945</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#8220;PortGate&#8221;: Shouldn&#8217;t U.S. Homeland Security Be Made In America?&lt;/strong&gt;

Read John L. submits the following to us by email:
	After going ballistic about &#8220;PortGate&#8221; and the implied dangers for US homeland security, one must ask another question, not as vital as security, but very important nonetheless.
	The big ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;PortGate&#8221;: Shouldn&#8217;t U.S. Homeland Security Be Made In America?</strong></p>
<p>Read John L. submits the following to us by email:<br />
	After going ballistic about &#8220;PortGate&#8221; and the implied dangers for US homeland security, one must ask another question, not as vital as security, but very important nonetheless.<br />
	The big &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete L.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53937</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53937</guid>
		<description>Letting any foreign controlled company manage our ports is a very bad idea.  There are many security issues here, not the least of which is having to discuss security classified stuff with personnel whose background the USA does not know and can&#039;t check.

UAE has laudered money for the terrorists and weren&#039;t some of the highjackers formerly residents of UAE.  We cannot trust them- period.

The process that is used to review purchases by foreign entities needs revamping, and it needs a process that is help in the sunshine.  That would clean it up.  I read only one or two out of a couple thousand were ever turned down.  Washington will do us in sooner than we think out here is the Red States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letting any foreign controlled company manage our ports is a very bad idea.  There are many security issues here, not the least of which is having to discuss security classified stuff with personnel whose background the USA does not know and can&#8217;t check.</p>
<p>UAE has laudered money for the terrorists and weren&#8217;t some of the highjackers formerly residents of UAE.  We cannot trust them- period.</p>
<p>The process that is used to review purchases by foreign entities needs revamping, and it needs a process that is help in the sunshine.  That would clean it up.  I read only one or two out of a couple thousand were ever turned down.  Washington will do us in sooner than we think out here is the Red States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotboy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/02/20/protect-our-ports-steam-builds/comment-page-2/#comment-53936</link>
		<dc:creator>patriotboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4157#comment-53936</guid>
		<description>Chertoff says that he can&#039;t get into details because of national security reasons. Hmmm, what could those reasons be?

Laundering Al Qaeda protection payments though the UAE would qualify as something you&#039;d need to bury in a security classification. Kickbacks would another. Any other guesses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chertoff says that he can&#8217;t get into details because of national security reasons. Hmmm, what could those reasons be?</p>
<p>Laundering Al Qaeda protection payments though the UAE would qualify as something you&#8217;d need to bury in a security classification. Kickbacks would another. Any other guesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

