Is this going to be the standard for when terrorists are brought before a court?
We will look at their history, they were beaten, they were degraded…
Why must we excuse their actions?

A defense psychologist said Tuesday he concluded Zacarias Moussaoui is a paranoid schizophrenic base

You have to feel just a little bit sorry for Zacarias Moussaoui’s lawyers. In April 2005, Moussaoui, who is currently on trial in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, for his involvement in the September 11 attacks, pled guilty to

Michelle Malkin writes about MSM sympathy for terror in the NYT piece on Zacharia Moussaoui’s pitiful childhood and his potential affliction with schizophrenia, and as also reported in the Associated Press. Clearly the defendent himself got it right wh…

I have always had a major problem with Psychiatry’s role in determining the degree of guilt or innocence in criminal cases. The original McNaughton rule was established in 1843:The McNaughton rule was a standard to be applied by the jury,

“It’s a lot of American B.S.” ….Not to be too Tom Cruise here, but he’s right.

The Zacarias Moussaoui defense will get him zero sympathy, and I am confident the jury will show just that.
The fact is, there will never be an excuse for bombing Tel Aviv, no excuse for flying planes into buildings, taking hostages, torturing and d…

Lawyers for Zacarias Moussaoui may just have thrown a monkey-wrench into the prosecutions plan to seek the death penalty against the alleged 9/11 co-conspirator. During the penalty phase of his trial social workers employed by the defense presented, am…