About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

KENNEDY/RUSH DOUBLE STANDARDS

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 8, 2006 09:43 PM

Howard Kurtz’s piece on the MSM’s differential treatment of Rep. Patrick Kennedy vs. Rush Limbaugh got a lot of buzz today, but Mark Levin nails it best:

Early on, prosecutors claimed they had evidence of over ten felonies. They demanded that Rush plead guilty to some felony—any felony. He refused, always insisting on his innocence. So, they leaked more lies to the media, hoping to intimidate him. They seized his medical records. They gave his medical records to the media. The media took those records and turned them into graphics for television. Reporters and commentators were studying his prescriptions, discussing both the kinds and amount of medicine he had taken. They were beside themselves with glee. Newsweek, AP and the Palm Beach Post, Rush’s local paper, were especially vicious, serving as lap-dogs for the prosecutors.

In court, Rush fought these people every step of the way—all the way to the Florida Supreme Court. He spent millions of dollars defending himself—despite the fact that he had been a first-time abuser, went to rehab, and was clean. And then last October, the lead prosecutor sauntered into court and in response to questioning told the judge—we have no evidence that Rush Limbaugh has committed any crime! None.

So, I am very angry. You will hear commentator after commentator speaking sympathetically about Patrick Kennedy and his addiction to painkillers. You will hear people say that he is addicted, he has a serious health problem, he deserves to be praised for his forthrightness today, and we should leave him alone. And many of these commentators will be the same people who were giddy in their ceaseless attacks on Rush.

I am angry at the double standard, where liberals are regularly treated one way and conservatives another. I am also glad Patrick Kennedy won’t be abused as Rush was. But you can be sure that the next conservative with a problem won’t be treated like Kennedy.

But there are some aspects to the Kennedy matter that require answers. If Patrick Kennedy, who is not a first offender, is addicted to painkillers, from where did he get them? And there are news reports that he had been drinking earlier at a Capitol Hill bar and alcohol was later smelled on his breath. So, why was the officer on the scene prevented by more senior police officers from performing a routine sobriety test?

I truly wish Patrick Kennedy well. But you bet I’m angry.

Posted in: Howard Kurtz

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Right Voices
  2. justbarkingmad.com
  3. Blog Rhode Island
  4. alprasolma

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Earth to Howard Kurtz

September 12, 2008 04:59 PM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Watching the watchdogs.

The liberal female blogger echo chamber

April 10, 2007 09:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Moral equivalence at the WaPo

March 26, 2007 01:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 1 Trackback

ClintonRage: The morning after

September 25, 2006 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

MEET THE NEW WH PRESS SEC’Y

April 25, 2006 09:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 33 Trackbacks

THE ANTIDOTE TO THE NEW YORK TIMES

April 19, 2006 08:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

QUESTIONING JILL CARROLL

March 31, 2006 09:06 AM by Allahpundit

0 Comments | 21 Trackbacks


Categories: Howard Kurtz


Marginal Revolution

» Paul Krugman wins the Nobel Prize

TigerHawk

» Days of Rage II

Riehl World View

» Gallup Has It At 4 Points

Redstate

» Working The Refs