Messages for the blabbermouths

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 23, 2006 01:01 PM

***scroll for photoshop entries***

wwii.jpg

wwii002.jpg

wwii003.jpg

wwii004.jpg

These WWII posters are in need of some 21st century photoshop updates.

Anyone inspired?

***

Send a letter to the Attorney General: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.

Reader J. Scott already did:

Please take action against those responsible for the recent NY and LA Times pieces that have compromised natinoal security, once again, in revealing the federal governments programs involving banking transactions. I am SICK and TIRED of these publications having diplomatic immunity. I understand and value the freedom of the press, but this is a time of war and we must protect ourselves from those who seek to bring aid to our enemies. Treason is a crime. Get a backbone and fight back!!

Must-read: Andy McCarthy

The blunt reality here is that there is a war against the war. It is the jihad of privacy fetishists whose self-absorption knows no bounds. Pleas rooted in the well-being of our community hold no sway.

The anti-warriors know only the language of self-interest. It is the language that tells them the revelation of the nation’s secrets will result, forthwith, in the demand for the revelation of their secrets — which is to say, their sources in the intelligence community — with incarceration the price of resistance. It is the language admonishing that even journalists themselves may be prosecuted when their publication of national secrets violates the law.

Bluntly, officials who leak the classified information with which they have been entrusted can be prosecuted for theft of government property. If the information is especially sensitive, they can be prosecuted for violating the Espionage Act. In either event, the press has no legal right to protect such lawlessness.

That is our simple choice: Strong medicine we will either take or persist in declining … while resigning ourselves to more of the same.

***
Photoshop entries incoming!

Thomas Culp:

wwii005.jpg

Jake G.:

wwii006.jpg

Previous:


Backlash against the blabbermouths

NYTimes blabbermouths strike again

Posted in: Blabbermouths

You must be logged in to post a comment.

CNN reports. You run for cover. Update: WalesOnline withdraws story

December 1, 2008 05:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

Blabbermouths.

The New York Times reveals the name of KSM’s interrogator, over the CIA’s wishes

June 22, 2008 10:22 AM by see-dubya

86 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Here’s how the Times says “thanks for your service…”

Cop tipped terror suspect that the FBI was investigating him, gets probation

April 23, 2008 06:08 PM by see-dubya

62 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ow, my wrist! That stings!

America, 1. ACLU, 0.

February 19, 2008 10:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Supreme Court ruling supports domestic terrorism surveillance.

White House threatens media crackdown

June 20, 2007 12:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

4 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Journalists get a warning: Leaking will be swiftly punished. Unfortunately, it’s not what you think…

The NYTimes’ unspeakable violation

February 1, 2007 12:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

Blabbermouth case update: NYT off the hook?

December 14, 2006 10:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

1 Comments | 1 Trackback

Supreme Court to NYTimes: Buzz off

November 27, 2006 07:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 7 Trackbacks


Categories: Blabbermouths



Legal Insurrection

» Blogging From Tegucigalpa

Conservatives4Palin

» Reactions Round-up