<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BUSH ON HAMDAN RULING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:41:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sports betting horse racing</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70903</link>
		<dc:creator>sports betting horse racing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70903</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;horse betting system&lt;/strong&gt;

horse betting travel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>horse betting system</strong></p>
<p>horse betting travel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discount</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70899</link>
		<dc:creator>discount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;discount&lt;/strong&gt;

discount</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>discount</strong></p>
<p>discount</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog enlargement 1164071901</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70898</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog enlargement 1164071901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70898</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;News on enlargement 1164071901 9746&lt;/strong&gt;

Find more on enlargement 1164071901</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News on enlargement 1164071901 9746</strong></p>
<p>Find more on enlargement 1164071901</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog lorazepam 1163762476</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70897</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog lorazepam 1163762476</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70897</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;News on lorazepam 1163762476 3993&lt;/strong&gt;

Find more on lorazepam 1163762476</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News on lorazepam 1163762476 3993</strong></p>
<p>Find more on lorazepam 1163762476</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ameoxiicllin</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70817</link>
		<dc:creator>ameoxiicllin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70817</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ameoxiicllin&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ameoxiicllin</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom for Some</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70813</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom for Some</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70813</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We Don’t Need No Stinking Jurisdiction&lt;/strong&gt;

After yesterdays decision by the Supreme Court that blocks Guantanamo Bay detainees from being tried in military tribunals, many Democrats are cheering as many on the right stand perplexed to how the Supreme court could even hear this complaint, not to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We Don’t Need No Stinking Jurisdiction</strong></p>
<p>After yesterdays decision by the Supreme Court that blocks Guantanamo Bay detainees from being tried in military tribunals, many Democrats are cheering as many on the right stand perplexed to how the Supreme court could even hear this complaint, not to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70812</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Tells CIC - Shoot &#039;Em Dead&lt;/strong&gt;

At least, that&#039;s the message I get from our extra-jurisdictional, power-grabbing jurists on the Supreme Court.  This decision has several implications: 1. Terrorists found on the battlefield will no longer be captured, but killed outright. Our milita...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Tells CIC &#8211; Shoot &#8216;Em Dead</strong></p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s the message I get from our extra-jurisdictional, power-grabbing jurists on the Supreme Court.  This decision has several implications: 1. Terrorists found on the battlefield will no longer be captured, but killed outright. Our milita&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Town Veteran</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70811</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Town Veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70811</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Death of a nation 2&lt;/strong&gt;

Video: Bush on Hamdan Dafydd: Time to Withdraw From Geneva... If We Can MM: Bush on Hamdan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Death of a nation 2</strong></p>
<p>Video: Bush on Hamdan Dafydd: Time to Withdraw From Geneva&#8230; If We Can MM: Bush on Hamdan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dumb Ox</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70810</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dumb Ox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70810</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Desecrate THIS!  (update) Ox News &amp; Weekend OTT&lt;/strong&gt;

Dems crowing over &quot;victory&quot; for flag desecration...  Israel and Palestinian terror regime on the brink...  Supreme court tempest in a teapot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Desecrate THIS!  (update) Ox News &#038; Weekend OTT</strong></p>
<p>Dems crowing over &#8220;victory&#8221; for flag desecration&#8230;  Israel and Palestinian terror regime on the brink&#8230;  Supreme court tempest in a teapot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70809</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 05:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70809</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Welcome Back 9/10&lt;/strong&gt;

In the end, while I was mighty pissed when first reading this decision I think this isn&#8217;t such a defeat for Bush.  All he has to do is go back to Congress and get them to approve of the tribunals.  Thats it in a nutshell I believe.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Welcome Back 9/10</strong></p>
<p>In the end, while I was mighty pissed when first reading this decision I think this isn&#8217;t such a defeat for Bush.  All he has to do is go back to Congress and get them to approve of the tribunals.  Thats it in a nutshell I believe.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unalienable Right</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70808</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unalienable Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70808</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court rules for al Qaeda in Hamdan&lt;/strong&gt;

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5-3 against the Bush Administration in the Hamdan case.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.
 The ruling, a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court rules for al Qaeda in Hamdan</strong></p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5-3 against the Bush Administration in the Hamdan case.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.<br />
 The ruling, a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cake or Death</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70807</link>
		<dc:creator>Cake or Death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court decision hamstrings the GWOT&lt;/strong&gt;

And it&#039;s gonna bring every civil rights attorney in the country to the captured terrorists in Guantanamo.  And the ACLU chimes right in and says if how we were prosecuting them doesn&#039;t fly then the prison itself must be closed too.  For a summary of ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court decision hamstrings the GWOT</strong></p>
<p>And it&#8217;s gonna bring every civil rights attorney in the country to the captured terrorists in Guantanamo.  And the ACLU chimes right in and says if how we were prosecuting them doesn&#8217;t fly then the prison itself must be closed too.  For a summary of &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate's Cove</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70806</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate's Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70806</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USSC Grants Terrorists Rights&lt;/strong&gt;

There must have been one hell of a legal brief to get the Supreme Court to make this ruling
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.
The ruling, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USSC Grants Terrorists Rights</strong></p>
<p>There must have been one hell of a legal brief to get the Supreme Court to make this ruling<br />
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.<br />
The ruling, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Art of the Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70805</link>
		<dc:creator>The Art of the Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70805</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hamdan v. Rumsfeld a Gift for Bush and Co.?&lt;/strong&gt;

(Via Michelle Malkin and Instapundit) Andrew Cochran and the Counterterrorism Blog has this to say about today&#039;s Hamdan decision: The decision is actually a huge political gift to President Bush, and the detainees will not be released that easily. The ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hamdan v. Rumsfeld a Gift for Bush and Co.?</strong></p>
<p>(Via Michelle Malkin and Instapundit) Andrew Cochran and the Counterterrorism Blog has this to say about today&#8217;s Hamdan decision: The decision is actually a huge political gift to President Bush, and the detainees will not be released that easily. The &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Wing = Hate</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/06/29/bush-on-hamdan-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-70804</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Wing = Hate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=4973#comment-70804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Liberal overthrow and takeover of the Internet thwarted in the US Senate&lt;/strong&gt;

From Newsmax.com
‘Net Neutrality’ Nixed by Senate Committee
The Senate Commerce Committee in a tight vote rejected strict Net neutrality rules late Wednesday afternoon.
The vote was good news for access providers and conservative groups who feared ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Liberal overthrow and takeover of the Internet thwarted in the US Senate</strong></p>
<p>From Newsmax.com<br />
‘Net Neutrality’ Nixed by Senate Committee<br />
The Senate Commerce Committee in a tight vote rejected strict Net neutrality rules late Wednesday afternoon.<br />
The vote was good news for access providers and conservative groups who feared &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
