Did You Know...


Eco-zealots vs. the Navy

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 6, 2006 07:31 PM

Back in 2002, I reported on efforts by animal rights activists to sabotage Navy sonar exercises:

Osama bin Laden gets help from the strangest creatures. As America’s military struggles to prepare its forces for the War on Terror, radical environmentalists are using marine life-whales, dolphins, and even squid-to try to block sea-based training exercises and technological innovations needed to ensure combat readiness.

Earlier this year, the Navy and Defense Department asked Congress to amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The federal law was passed in 1972 to protect ocean life. But its poor wording and ridiculously broad standards undermine our armed forces and endanger national security. The law bars any and all “harassment” of marine mammals-including “any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance” which might have “the potential to injure” or “the potential to disturb” a marine mammal or marine mammal stock.

This murky language means that the Navy can’t make a single splash without worrying whether some eco-extremist group will sue them for flipping out Flipper or stressing out the seaweed. Taken literally, one Navy official points out, the law could classify the wake from a naval vessel as a harassing force if it simply caused a seal sleeping on a buoy to dive into the water.

Even the former Clinton administration saw the litigious havoc the law could wreak on military operations, and along with several government agencies and the independent National Research Council, supported a statutory change requiring that the injury or disturbance to marine mammals be deemed “significant.” But Congress, pressured by environmental and ocean advocacy groups, refuses to amend the language. The House is set to reauthorize the Marine Mammal Protection Act this week without the military’s requested change.

So under the current law-the War on Terror be damned-Navy exercise planners and scientists must obtain an environmental permit in advance of every mission or activity that would potentially annoy or disturb marine life. According to Navy officials, it takes at least four months, if not years, to complete the application process for a permit (effective for only one year). The process is mired by obstructionist environmental activists who champion the so-called “precautionary principle,” which holds the military to the impossible standard of proving that its activities will cause absolutely no harm to the environment.

The paralyzing threat to military readiness of this extremist regulatory philosophy is grave. According to Navy Admiral William J. Fallon, vice-chief of naval operations, three ships from the U.S.S. Carl Vinson battle group were deployed to Operation Enduring Freedom without crucial anti-ship cruise missile defensive training because such training would “potentially disturb” seals when target drones flew over them. Naval researchers have been blocked from improving the Navy’s capability to detect enemy submarines by groups opposed to underwater sound testing and measurements.

And several environmental groups have announced their intention to challenge the Bush administration’s deployment of the Navy’s Low Frequency Active Sonar, a key defense against stealthy, ultra-quiet diesel submarines being developed by China, Russia, and Germany. Despite numerous precautions and mitigation measures being taken by the Navy, Mark Palmer of the San Francisco-based Earth Island Institute fretted on CNN last weekend that the system is a “sonar bomb” developed by the Navy “to attack whales and other sorts of things in the name of finding submarines, and we don’t think it’s appropriate. We know very little about the effects on fish, on squid, on other types of marine organisms.”

Foreign enemies invaded our borders and murdered over 3,000 men, women and children on Sept. 11. Hundreds of thousands of young men and women have volunteered to make sure it doesn’t happen again. And all this guy can worry about is the comfort level of squid and plankton?

The eco-zealots’ priorities remain as twisted as ever. Walter Olson at Overlawyered updates the legal cases and rounds-up news links. He notes:

the U.S. Navy says it will employ less effective passive sonar, rather than active sonar, in exercises off Hawaii intended to simulate anti-submarine warfare. The NRDC complained that when the Department of Defense granted the Navy a temporary exemption from the Marine Mammals Protection Act for purposes of the exercises, it was trying to evade being sued. (” Whale lawsuit forces Navy to change sonar plan”, AP/CNN, Jul. 5). “The Navy, in a statement after the ruling, said sonar was ‘the only effective means we have to detect and quickly target hostile submarines and keep sea lanes open,’ and that sonar operators needed training at sea ‘to protect our nation’s ships, shores and allies.’…. The sonar use is meant to test whether quiet, diesel-powered submarines like those used by Iran, North Korea and China can be detected.”

Big Lizards reports on a federal judge’s order baning naval sonar use in the Pacific Ocean with appropriate snark:

In a related decision, rumor has it that Judge Cooper is just about to rule that we can no longer use radar, because it might emit radiation; fighter jets, because they’re too noisy (and too closely associated with George W. Bush); and Predator drones — because, as a vegetarian, she doesn’t like the sound of that name.

Were I giving advice to the president, I would tell him, “Dude” — which is one reason I’m not advising the CinC — “it’s time to draw a line in the sand.” (As a Texan, he should appreciate the reference.) Bush should call a press conference and announce that the federal judiciary does not have authority over the military; the Constitution clearly gives that authority solely to the president as Commander in Chief. So he thanks her honor for the suggestion, but the test will proceed as planned, and as the Pentagon has approved.

Lady, we are in a war, for God’s sake. You don’t stop the military from testing the weapons that save our lives every day just because your heart bleeds for Flipper, Shamu and all their undersea chums.

I realize your calendar stops at September 10th; but for the rest of us, what happened the next day changed everything. In particular, it changed forever the level of monkeyshines that we are willing to tolerate in the war against jihadis.


PETA get an early jump on April Fools with this?

March 31, 2017 08:56 PM by Doug Powers

They try so hard

Sponsors of Anarchy

January 18, 2017 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

PETA names its ‘Person of the Year’ but one animal didn’t get a vote

December 18, 2014 03:16 PM by Doug Powers

Who speaks for Chuck?

PETA Heartache: Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Seeking Slavery Protection for SeaWorld Whales

February 8, 2012 09:36 PM by Doug Powers

Animal rights group’s legal counsel, above, may appeal

Categories: Animal rights wackos