If a talking head talks to himself on C-Span, does anyone hear a debate?
One of my mentors on Islam–because before 9/11, who knew?–is Robert Spencer, a gifted writer whose books and journalism are informed by careful scholarship and logical analysis.
His most recent book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), made the New York Times bestseller list–with virtually no MSM reviews. Meanwhile, his website, JihadWatch, along with its sister site, DhimmiWatch, is required reading for anyone who wants to know how the world will end. Just kidding. I mean, it’s for anyone who wants to increase his awareness of, well, jihad and dhimmitude.
This falll, his new book, “The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion” (catchy title, Robert), will be published, and right smack in the middle of Ramadan (nice gift idea, Robert).
You can catch Robert this weekend (Sunday at 8pm and 11pm) on C-Span in a Brian Lamb interview. Of course, if you are a faithful C-Span viewer, you might have caught snippets of Robert’s interview already. In one of the looser interpretations of what are vaguely known as journalistic ethics, C-Span took portions of the unaired Spencer interview and showed them, in a completely separate interview that has already aired, to Akbar Ahmed, a Muslim academic from American University. Mr. Ahmed was then asked, on the air, to refute Robert’s taped analysis of jihad doctrine and other now-controversial issues. Since Robert was not given the same chance to respond to Mr. Ahmed, he has exercised his Freedom of the Blogosphere and done so here–and sent it to Mr. Ahmed. “Thank you for your response. I look forward to talking soon,” Mr. Ahmed replied.
It seems like an awful lot of trouble for Robert to have to go just to try to have a reasoned debate. Here’s a bright idea for C-Span: Invite both men back at the same time to talk this thing out face to face.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Uncategorized
Legal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No Reid
The Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to Conclusions
Legal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names
The Powers That Be
» A Picture is Worth a Trillion Dollars and Lots of Lost Freedom
Riehl World View
» Health Care Bill In A Few Words
Pundit & Pundette
» Not a huge victory
JustOneMinute
» Ari Fleischer Needs To Cowboy Up
The Other McCain
» Debunking Frank Rich's NY23 fantasies







See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL