<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The veil and the rage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:08:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Uncooperative Blogger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83809</link>
		<dc:creator>The Uncooperative Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83809</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Muslim Veil and Female Subjugation&lt;/strong&gt;

From Times Online:
The veil is not a religious obligation — it is a symbol of the subjugation by men of their wives and daughters.
The growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of radicalisation. I was disturbed when, after my ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Muslim Veil and Female Subjugation</strong></p>
<p>From Times Online:<br />
The veil is not a religious obligation — it is a symbol of the subjugation by men of their wives and daughters.<br />
The growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of radicalisation. I was disturbed when, after my &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tel-Chai Nation</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tel-Chai Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83808</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Veil rage and schools of segragation in Britain&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;d wanted to blog about this earlier, but my browser suffered a crash in between, so I was forced to put off what I&#039;d wanted to do until now. Well, you&#039;ve probably all heard about former foreign secretary Jack Straw&#039;s surprise criticism of the Islam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Veil rage and schools of segragation in Britain</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;d wanted to blog about this earlier, but my browser suffered a crash in between, so I was forced to put off what I&#8217;d wanted to do until now. Well, you&#8217;ve probably all heard about former foreign secretary Jack Straw&#8217;s surprise criticism of the Islam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Blog Therapy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83806</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Blog Therapy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83806</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack Straw from... Londonistan?&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle links this op-ed from the Times of London:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack Straw from&#8230; Londonistan?</strong></p>
<p>Michelle links this op-ed from the Times of London:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Schrödinger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83805</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Schrödinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83805</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Unveiling Islam&lt;/strong&gt;

Times Online via Michelle Malkin:The growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of radicalisation. I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Unveiling Islam</strong></p>
<p>Times Online via Michelle Malkin:The growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of radicalisation. I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83804</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Veil Rage Rages On&lt;/strong&gt;

The veil and the rageMichelle Malkin Robert Spencer looks at continuing Muslim veil rage over former British foreign minister Jack Straw&#039;s comments on this week&#039;s edition of Jihad Watch on Hot Air TV. He points to a candid op-ed published</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Veil Rage Rages On</strong></p>
<p>The veil and the rageMichelle Malkin Robert Spencer looks at continuing Muslim veil rage over former British foreign minister Jack Straw&#8217;s comments on this week&#8217;s edition of Jihad Watch on Hot Air TV. He points to a candid op-ed published</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feminine-genius</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/12/the-veil-and-the-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-83803</link>
		<dc:creator>feminine-genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5602#comment-83803</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who can speak to the question?&lt;/strong&gt;

In a pluralistic society, there is the insidious charge that only a particular segment of the population can speak to certain questions, the segment most affected. Thus, feminists say that no men can speak about abortion since they cannot get pregnant,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who can speak to the question?</strong></p>
<p>In a pluralistic society, there is the insidious charge that only a particular segment of the population can speak to certain questions, the segment most affected. Thus, feminists say that no men can speak about abortion since they cannot get pregnant,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
