Michelle Malkin » A Ca-lame response

A Ca-lame response

By Michelle Malkin • October 25, 2006 06:31 PM

NYTimes ombudsman Byron Calame: (Not) looking out for you

A few days ago, I asked NYTimes public editor Byron Calame to explain exactly what he meant when he complained about the Bush administration’s “vicious criticism” of the newspaper’s reckless decision to expose a top-secret terrorist banking data surveillance program. I received a response this afternoon. You will be as underwhelmed as I am, I’m sure:

Translation: It’s so “amply documented” I don’t need to bother citing any of it to you. Trademark arrogance from the newspaper of wreckage.

Thanks for the response!

***
Previous:

Follow-up questions for Byron Calame and the Times’ Bush-bashing allies
NYTimes editor now admits: We were wrong to blab
The blabbermouths backpedal
The newspaper of wreckage
Why they blabbed: It’s the arrogance
How about a nice big glass of…
More blabbermouth posters
Messages for the blabbermouths
Backlash against the blabbermouths
NYTimes blabbermouths strike again
The terrorist-tipping Times

Posted in: New York Times

Regular View

comments (0)

trackbacks (3)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

“Insufficient tuned-in-ness.”

What’s missing from the New York Times coverage of ACORN

September 16, 2009 12:09 AM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Who said it: “The real story to all this is how these myriad entities allow them to shuffle money around so much that no one really knows what’s getting spent on what.”