<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoekstra responds to NYTimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:22:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UrbanGrounds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84938</link>
		<dc:creator>UrbanGrounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84938</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Pete Hoekstra vs. The NY Times&lt;/strong&gt;

U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra beats down the editors at the Al Qaeda Times of New York. Here&#8217;s the conclusion of his statement:
&#8220;Finally, it is disappointing but not surprising that the New York Times would continue to participate in such blata...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rep. Pete Hoekstra vs. The NY Times</strong></p>
<p>U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra beats down the editors at the Al Qaeda Times of New York. Here&#8217;s the conclusion of his statement:<br />
&#8220;Finally, it is disappointing but not surprising that the New York Times would continue to participate in such blata&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzyblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzyblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84937</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The &#8216;No WMD&#8217; Lie: NY Times Adds More Icing to Already-Baked Cake&lt;/strong&gt;

BizzyBlog readers know the argument over whether Saddam had weapons of mass destruction ended long ago (see Previous Posts list below).
Thursday marked the one-year anniversary of the BizzyBlog post that got so many people riled up but that no one has ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The &#8216;No WMD&#8217; Lie: NY Times Adds More Icing to Already-Baked Cake</strong></p>
<p>BizzyBlog readers know the argument over whether Saddam had weapons of mass destruction ended long ago (see Previous Posts list below).<br />
Thursday marked the one-year anniversary of the BizzyBlog post that got so many people riled up but that no one has &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't Go Into The Light</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84936</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Go Into The Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84936</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The NYT Nuke Cookbook Story&lt;/strong&gt;

Early yesterday morning I emailed another blogger on an unrelated topic, but included my thoughts on the NYT&#039;s story: I&#039;m staying away from the NYT nuke story for now. The article was clear that the documents were pre-gulf war, I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The NYT Nuke Cookbook Story</strong></p>
<p>Early yesterday morning I emailed another blogger on an unrelated topic, but included my thoughts on the NYT&#8217;s story: I&#8217;m staying away from the NYT nuke story for now. The article was clear that the documents were pre-gulf war, I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small dead animals</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84935</link>
		<dc:creator>small dead animals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84935</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;International Atomic Energy Agency Documents In Saddams Hands?&lt;/strong&gt;

Pete Hoekstra, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee; &quot;These documents also raise several additional issues of interest. First, it is extraordinary that the New York Times now acknowledges that the captured documents demonstrate that &#039;[Saddam] H...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>International Atomic Energy Agency Documents In Saddams Hands?</strong></p>
<p>Pete Hoekstra, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee; &#8220;These documents also raise several additional issues of interest. First, it is extraordinary that the New York Times now acknowledges that the captured documents demonstrate that &#8216;[Saddam] H&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchlight Crusade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84934</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchlight Crusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Upon Publishing Iraqi Data Regarding Nuclear Weapons on the Web&lt;/strong&gt;

Oliver Willis (among others) is going bananas over allegations in the NY Times that the Bush administration put Iraqi documents on the web that supposedl gave third w...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Upon Publishing Iraqi Data Regarding Nuclear Weapons on the Web</strong></p>
<p>Oliver Willis (among others) is going bananas over allegations in the NY Times that the Bush administration put Iraqi documents on the web that supposedl gave third w&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84933</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84933</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NYT&#039;s Funny November Surprise&lt;/strong&gt;

So, the NYT brought a November surprise today. I guess with circulation plummeting, they figured they better delay the date of their bi-annual attack for maximum effect. The Al-QaQaa dust-up of &#039;04 happened in late October.
But let&#039;s take a look at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NYT&#8217;s Funny November Surprise</strong></p>
<p>So, the NYT brought a November surprise today. I guess with circulation plummeting, they figured they better delay the date of their bi-annual attack for maximum effect. The Al-QaQaa dust-up of &#8216;04 happened in late October.<br />
But let&#8217;s take a look at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NYT&#039;s Funny November Surprise&lt;/strong&gt;

So, the NYT brought a November surprise today. I guess with circulation plummeting, they figured they better delay the date of their bi-annual attack for maximum effect. The Al-QaQaa dust-up of &#039;04 happened in late October.
But let&#039;s take a look at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NYT&#8217;s Funny November Surprise</strong></p>
<p>So, the NYT brought a November surprise today. I guess with circulation plummeting, they figured they better delay the date of their bi-annual attack for maximum effect. The Al-QaQaa dust-up of &#8216;04 happened in late October.<br />
But let&#8217;s take a look at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Proctor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84931</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84931</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Times Inadvertently Admits Iraq Was Nuclear Lea&lt;/strong&gt;

Essentially, pre-2003 Iraq had more developed nuclear know-how than Iran and North Korea. This sustains the international belief that Saddam Hussein was indeed capable of and engaging in the development of a nuclear program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Times Inadvertently Admits Iraq Was Nuclear Lea</strong></p>
<p>Essentially, pre-2003 Iraq had more developed nuclear know-how than Iran and North Korea. This sustains the international belief that Saddam Hussein was indeed capable of and engaging in the development of a nuclear program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84930</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Rainmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84930</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NYTimes:  Documents Reveal Iraq Was &#8220;On the Verge of Building an Atom Bomb&#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;

*2 Updates*
Lots of questions surrounding this article in the New York Times&#8230; the least of which is the timing of the article.
On the one hand, it seems to be implying the Bush administration was incompetent in allowing a &#8220;cookbook for buil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NYTimes:  Documents Reveal Iraq Was &#8220;On the Verge of Building an Atom Bomb&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>*2 Updates*<br />
Lots of questions surrounding this article in the New York Times&#8230; the least of which is the timing of the article.<br />
On the one hand, it seems to be implying the Bush administration was incompetent in allowing a &#8220;cookbook for buil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Princess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84929</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Princess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84929</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You Know, It Can Still Sink Into the East River&lt;/strong&gt;

Granted, theres at least a modicum of belief in the system left within us to grant that international governance, overhauled, and with John Bolton at the helm would be a marginally effective form of conflict resolution, but that kind of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You Know, It Can Still Sink Into the East River</strong></p>
<p>Granted, theres at least a modicum of belief in the system left within us to grant that international governance, overhauled, and with John Bolton at the helm would be a marginally effective form of conflict resolution, but that kind of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church and State</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84928</link>
		<dc:creator>Church and State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84928</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If Jihadists could Vote . . . it would be Democrat&lt;/strong&gt;

Resistance: the most important tool. And American citizens control to what extent their tool is used. Do we allow them to employ their tool or hold it for another day when they are even weaker? I&#039;d hope for the latter. In the last several weeks, I ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If Jihadists could Vote . . . it would be Democrat</strong></p>
<p>Resistance: the most important tool. And American citizens control to what extent their tool is used. Do we allow them to employ their tool or hold it for another day when they are even weaker? I&#8217;d hope for the latter. In the last several weeks, I ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84927</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84927</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program&lt;/strong&gt;

(Continued -- See previous post here.)Hoekstra responds to NYTimesMichelle Malkin I&#039;m reprinting U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra&#039;s entire statement:Yesterday&#039;s article by the New York Times highlights a number of important issues with respect to Iraq&#039;s WMD pro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program</strong></p>
<p>(Continued &#8212; See previous post here.)Hoekstra responds to NYTimesMichelle Malkin I&#8217;m reprinting U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra&#8217;s entire statement:Yesterday&#8217;s article by the New York Times highlights a number of important issues with respect to Iraq&#8217;s WMD pro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84926</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84926</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Grey Lady Discovers Saddam Had Nuclear Aspirations&lt;/strong&gt;

UPDATE
The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasn&#8217;t dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet. 
I just had to put the above sentence from Jim Geraghty up at the top of th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Grey Lady Discovers Saddam Had Nuclear Aspirations</strong></p>
<p>UPDATE<br />
The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasn&#8217;t dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet.<br />
I just had to put the above sentence from Jim Geraghty up at the top of th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joust The Facts</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84925</link>
		<dc:creator>Joust The Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 20:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84925</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Times Has Done It Again&lt;/strong&gt;

This time, though, I think they&#039;re going to be pretty unhappy about what they&#039;ve done. Attempting to go on offense and administer the coup de grace to their beleaguered opponent, the NY Times exposes a story today how Iraqi nuclear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Times Has Done It Again</strong></p>
<p>This time, though, I think they&#8217;re going to be pretty unhappy about what they&#8217;ve done. Attempting to go on offense and administer the coup de grace to their beleaguered opponent, the NY Times exposes a story today how Iraqi nuclear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sensible Mom</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2006/11/03/hoekstra-responds-to-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-84924</link>
		<dc:creator>Sensible Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=5763#comment-84924</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hoekstra Responds&lt;/strong&gt;

Pete Hoekstra responds to the NYT. Key quotes, ...my staff&#039;s preliminary review of the documents in question suggests that at least some of them may be internal IAEA documents. There is a serious question of why and how the Iraqi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hoekstra Responds</strong></p>
<p>Pete Hoekstra responds to the NYT. Key quotes, &#8230;my staff&#8217;s preliminary review of the documents in question suggests that at least some of them may be internal IAEA documents. There is a serious question of why and how the Iraqi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
