Probe-a-pallooza, the Dems, and Iraq
The NYTimes editorial board got itself so gleefully worked up over the prospect of Democrat probe-a-pallooza on the Iraq war that it left the truth in the dust.
Karl at Protein Wisdom has a withering rejoinder.
Meanwhile, Sen. Carl Levin is leading the 4-6 month Iraq withdrawal charge.
If you haven’t read Paul Mirengoff’s analysis, “What about Iraq,” you should.
And note these poll results, which aren’t getting much attention:
While a bare majority of 51 percent called the Democrats’ victory “a good thing,” even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would keep the administration “from doing what is necessary to combat terrorism,” and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Iraq
Power Line
» The Alarmists Do "Science": A Case Study
Power Line
» When In Doubt, Delete
Pundit & Pundette
» About last night's vote
JustOneMinute
» "Unequivocal"?
NewsBusters.org
» WaPo's Dana Milbank: 'The Senate Really Has 100 Blanche DuBoises'
Commentary
» The End of the Beginning
Gay Patriot
» How John Hoeven Can Save America
Commentary
» Flotsam and Jetsam








See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL