Comments on: Internet defamation: A dissent

By: pressure washing 27617

pressure washing 27617 — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:23:20 +0000

pressure washing clip art

home pressure washing atlanta

By: sports betting odds

sports betting odds — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:53:25 +0000

sports betting tip

sports betting online

By: unclaimed money search

unclaimed money search — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 11:47:05 +0000

unclaimed government money

free unclaimed money

By: sports betting online

sports betting online — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:35:53 +0000

sports betting odd

international sports betting

By: term life insurance quote online

term life insurance quote online — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:43:29 +0000

life insurance

insurance life term

By: help to quit smoking

help to quit smoking — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:29:55 +0000

quit smoking cigarette

quit smoking for good

By: quit smoking

quit smoking — Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:28:29 +0000

quit smoking

quit smoking

By: credit counseling

credit counseling — Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:10:25 +0000

credit counseling

credit counseling

By: UNCoRRELATED

UNCoRRELATED — Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:38:13 +0000

A Lower Standard

I hadn’t had the time or inclination to contemplate the Barrett v. Rosenthal decision that held that internet users who republish defamatory statements are immune from liability for those statements. What I’ve seen in the blogosphere has been generally…

By: HiWired Blog

HiWired Blog — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:17:21 +0000

What can you say and what can’t you say on the blog

There was an important court ruling in California concerning blogs and speech this week. In Barrett v. Rosenthal the Supreme court said that unless you are the person who was the originator of a particular libel you are not legally…

By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog

FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:15:56 +0000

California Supreme Court Watch: Websites NOT Liable for Libel in Third-Party Postings

Carol A. Corrigan, left, smiles while being sworn in by Supreme Court of California Chief Justice Ronald M. George, right, as an associate justice to the Supreme Court of California in San Francisco, Wednesday Jan. 4, 2006. Corrigan was selected by Go…

By: Webloggin

Webloggin — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:54:11 +0000

Web Publishers Win In California Supreme Court Decision

I disagree with those who view the California ruling as a negative.

…

By: rightlinx.com

rightlinx.com — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:13:41 +0000

Liable For Libel

Kim at Wizbang reports on a recent California Supreme Court ruling concerning libelous statements made by third parties online, such as things you commenters out there might say here. The court said that bloggers could not be held liable for those stat…

By: Dave Lucas

Dave Lucas — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:40:16 +0000

Internet Defamation

With all the Melinda Duckett stuff going on, a lot of blogs and forums are being scanned by lawyer-types yearning to make a buck. Living in the USA, I am familiar with our Right to Free Speech. That right is extended to the Internet, or so thought I…

By: damnum absque injuria

damnum absque injuria — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:52:56 +0000

Freedom to Libel – Concurring in the Result

The Communications Decency Act should be repealed, but that’s a job for Congress, not the courts.

…