About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Putting Sandy Berger to the test

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 23, 2007 12:50 AM

A lie detector test.

As the FNC story points out, the document-filching Clinton aide did agree to take a polygraph test as part of a plea deal reached in September 2005. Now, some GOP lawmakers want to know why the Justice Department won’t follow through:

The Justice Department should administer a polygraph test to former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger to find out what documents he took from the National Archives in 2002 and 2003, Rep. Tom Davis wrote in a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales dated Monday.

Davis, ranking Republican on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, is leading a group of 18 lawmakers who say the Justice Department has been “remarkably incurious” about Berger’s decision to remove documents relating to the Sept. 11 commission’s inquiry into his role in helping prevent terror attacks during the Clinton administration.

“It is extraordinarily important that the Justice Department avail itself of its rights under the plea agreement and administer a polygraph examination to Mr. Berger to question him about the extent of his thievery. This may be the only way for anyone to know whether Mr. Berger denied the 9/11 commission and the public the complete account of the Clinton administration’s actions or inactions during the lead up to the terrorist attacks on the United States,” Davis wrote.

Makes sense to me. So what’s the hold up, DOJ?

bergler.jpg
Photoshop: Shieldsnet

***
Previous:

Where Sandy socked the docs
Sandy Berger: Guilty
Berger and a side order of lies
Berger’s “copies”
Ground turkey Berger
Sandy Berg(l)er?

Posted in: Sandy Berger

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Anonymous
  2. The Pink Flamingo
  3. Bill's Bites
  4. Old War Dogs
  5. Tel-Chai Nation
  6. Suitably Flip
  7. AntiPolygraph.org News
  8. Cal

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sandy Berg(l)er forfeits law license

May 17, 2007 01:07 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Berger and a side order of lies

Where Sandy socked the docs

December 20, 2006 05:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

“Path” advisory: Life imitates Photoshop

September 10, 2006 08:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Broken “Path”

September 8, 2006 09:36 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 28 Trackbacks

QUICK LINKS

October 19, 2005 02:12 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

ABLE DANGER…AND DANGER ENABLERS

August 12, 2005 12:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 23 Trackbacks

THE LARRY FRANKLIN SCANDAL CONTINUED

May 5, 2005 09:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 5 Trackbacks


Categories: Sandy Berger


NewsBusters.org

» Barack Who?

Confederate Yankee

» It's Palin!

Marginal Revolution

» Sarah Palin

Right Wing Nut House

» OBAMA’S SPEECH: NOT BAD AT ALL