The demonstrators the MSM downplays

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 23, 2007 10:54 AM

What if tens of thousands of protesters poured into Washington, D.C., exercising their free speech and joining peacefully to participate in public debate? How would the MSM cover them?

If it’s tens of thousands of pro-illegal alien marchers, they get front-page, banner headline-plus-multimedia bonanza, panoramic coverage gushing over their ability to “flood the Mall” with “passion” and “pride.” Remember?

aliencvg.jpg

wapoalien.jpg

If it’s Cindy Sheehan and her anti-war rabble, they get frenzied breaking-news, gaggle-crammed, hagiographic coverage:

sheehgaggle.jpg

wapoantiwar.jpg

But if it’s tens of thousands of pro-life marchers? You’d hardly know they overwhelmed the National Mall yesterday. The story made A10 in the Washington Post under the blah-blah headline, “Abortion Foes to Renew Efforts.”

wapolife.jpg

The stingy photo gallery on the WaPo’s website had just 8 photos–3 of which were of a tiny counter-protest by pro-abortion demonstrators and only 1 of which was a medium-wide shot of the Mall showing the pro-life crowd. Tim Graham noticed the same bias:

The story was illustrated by color photos, but in a far too common tactic, the Post balanced a picture of four pro-life demonstrators with “Defend Life” signs in daylight against a photo of four or five feminists with “Keep Abortion Legal” signs at an evening Supreme Court vigil. One side turns out tens of thousands, and the other turned out tens. The Post didn’t exactly balance its photos when it came to illegal-alien rallies, not to mention the number of column inches was vastly larger.

The Washington Times had better coverage, but no pics [clarificaton - no pics on the website. WashTimes editor Robert Stacy McCain notes that the paper carried two large photos of the march prominently in the print edition]. I was at Union Station yesterday as marchers streamed in after the event. The place was absolutely packed–wall-to-wall with families, babies, toddlers, teens, and college undergrads. I wish I had my camera, because the vast number of young people really struck me. Throngs and throngs of ordinary kids who came from all across the country to express their pro-life views in the bitter cold. You never see them on the nightly news or the front page of the major newspapers.

Fortunately, pro-life blogger Barbara at Mommy Life brought her camera. Check out her photo gallery for the scenes missing from the national papers’ front pages.

What liberal media?

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sister Toldjah
  2. Bill's Bites
  3. Are We Lumberjacks?
  4. Catholic Whiteboy
  5. Pieces of a Whole
  6. BizzyBlog
  7. Blue Star Chronicles
  8. Cao's Blog

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stomach-turners of the morning

July 2, 2009 10:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Pimps and things.

Mapping the “climate of hate”

June 3, 2009 09:45 AM by Michelle Malkin

147 Comments | 47 Trackbacks

Notes on the murder of George Tiller

June 1, 2009 12:48 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 44 Trackbacks

Showdown at Notre Dame

May 15, 2009 06:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

107 Comments | 23 Trackbacks

Senate confirms low-balling HHS Secretary

April 28, 2009 07:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

76 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

John Kerry, Catholicism and abortion: Courage of somebody else’s convictions

April 24, 2009 07:00 AM by Doug Powers

48 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Wherever the wind blows

Obama’s HHS Secretary nominee can’t count

April 13, 2009 09:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Math is hard.


Categories: Abortion, Cindy Sheehan, Washington Post



Pundit & Pundette

» Is the tide turning?