The all-important Charles Barkley vote

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 21, 2007 08:59 PM

Obama’s got it locked up. Phew. The suspense was killing me.

Obama’s also got the coveted Rep. Keith Ellison endorsement. And here’s vid of him smoothing out the ruffled feathers with Hillary.

At an Obama-less forum, the rest of the Dems talk amongst themselves. Bitterness, backbiting, backstabbing, and backtracking ensue. More from the NYTimes:

wo Democratic presidential rivals of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton applied more pressure to her over Iraq today, extolling the virtue of admitting mistakes about the war — which she has not done — and comparing politicians who do not to President Bush.

The toughest words, made here at the first Democratic candidate forum of the 2008 race, came from former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina. He said that Americans needed “a different kind of leadership” from a president who, Mr. Edwards said, had refused to admit errors on Iraq. Mr. Edwards has apologized for his 2002 vote to authorize military action in Iraq; Mrs. Clinton cast the same vote and has stood by it while also criticizing the war strategy.

“We need a leader who will be open and honest with you and with the American people — who will tell the truth, who will tell the truth when they’ve made a mistake, who will take responsibility when they’ve made a mistake,” Mr. Edwards said.

“If we want to live in a moral and just America and we want America to be able to lead in a moral and just world, we need a leader who is honest, open and decent,” he added.

Asked by the forum’s moderator, George Stephanopoulus of ABC News, about Mrs. Clinton’s explanation that her vote was cast sincerely based on military intelligence at the time, Mr. Edwards replied: “Whether it’s good enough I think is between her and her conscience — it’s not for me to judge.”

Another candidate, Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who has also renounced his 2002 vote, said there was “nothing wrong” with admitting mistakes.

“There are two things that people in public life — two responses people in public life never like to give, and I don’t understand why: ‘I made a mistake’ and ‘I don’t know,’ ” Mr. Dodd said. “I’ve made them in the past, I’ll make them in the future.”

Because the forum rules prevented direct engagement among the candidates — indeed, they only appeared on the stage one after another — Mrs. Clinton was inhibited from responding immediately.

Knock yourselves out.

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. JammieWearingFool
  2. Bill's Bites

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.

Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

January 13, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Hillary Clinton’s pay-for-pay problem

January 8, 2009 10:45 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Quid pro quo.


Categories: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards



Pundit & Pundette

» Is the tide turning?