<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Amendment victory in D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92146</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92146</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gun Recommendations&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m so excited about the possibility of owning a gun! In D.C., only the criminals and cops have guns. We law-abiding residents just have to take our chances. The following was posted on my blog on March 9, the day...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gun Recommendations</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m so excited about the possibility of owning a gun! In D.C., only the criminals and cops have guns. We law-abiding residents just have to take our chances. The following was posted on my blog on March 9, the day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dissentators</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92145</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dissentators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92145</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Militia by Any Other Name...&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Militia by Any Other Name&#8230;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lest Darkness Fall</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92144</link>
		<dc:creator>Lest Darkness Fall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 07:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dangerous Ruling for the Bad Guys&lt;/strong&gt;

Fantastic news for several reasons:

    * Residents of crime ridden Washington D.C. can now more easily own the means to defend themselves

    * If D.C. residents use guns to defend themselves, we should see the usual drop in violent crime and ho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dangerous Ruling for the Bad Guys</strong></p>
<p>Fantastic news for several reasons:</p>
<p>    * Residents of crime ridden Washington D.C. can now more easily own the means to defend themselves</p>
<p>    * If D.C. residents use guns to defend themselves, we should see the usual drop in violent crime and ho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lest Darkness Fall</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92143</link>
		<dc:creator>Lest Darkness Fall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 07:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dangerous Ruling for the Bad Guys&lt;/strong&gt;

Fantastic news for several reasons:

    * Residents of crime ridden Washington D.C. can now more easily own the means to defend themselves

    * If D.C. residents use guns to defend themselves, we should see the usual drop in violent crime and ho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dangerous Ruling for the Bad Guys</strong></p>
<p>Fantastic news for several reasons:</p>
<p>    * Residents of crime ridden Washington D.C. can now more easily own the means to defend themselves</p>
<p>    * If D.C. residents use guns to defend themselves, we should see the usual drop in violent crime and ho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dohiyi Mir</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92142</link>
		<dc:creator>Dohiyi Mir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92142</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tackleberry Will Be So Happy&lt;/strong&gt;

This might surprise people, but I agree with Michelle Malkin and this court decision:A federal appeals court ruled yesterday that the District&#039;s longtime ban on keeping handguns in homes is unconstitutional. The 2 to 1 decision by an appellate panel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tackleberry Will Be So Happy</strong></p>
<p>This might surprise people, but I agree with Michelle Malkin and this court decision:A federal appeals court ruled yesterday that the District&#8217;s longtime ban on keeping handguns in homes is unconstitutional. The 2 to 1 decision by an appellate panel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92141</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92141</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DC Gun Ban Unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;

This is big. Very big. It has been a long time coming. Anyone reading the 2nd amendment should be able to see that it protects the rights of individuals to possess firearms for the collective good. The American Thinker has this.

The United States Cour...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DC Gun Ban Unconstitutional</strong></p>
<p>This is big. Very big. It has been a long time coming. Anyone reading the 2nd amendment should be able to see that it protects the rights of individuals to possess firearms for the collective good. The American Thinker has this.</p>
<p>The United States Cour&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gun Toting Liberal ™</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92140</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gun Toting Liberal ™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;District of Columbia Circuit Court Restores Civil Liberty To D.C. Citizens&lt;/strong&gt;

Wow, it&#8217;s been a busy, busy day for me but you KNEW I would have to chime in on today&#8217;s news of our 2nd Amendment Civil Liberty to Keep And Bear Arms being upheld today by the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia.  An American Citize...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>District of Columbia Circuit Court Restores Civil Liberty To D.C. Citizens</strong></p>
<p>Wow, it&#8217;s been a busy, busy day for me but you KNEW I would have to chime in on today&#8217;s news of our 2nd Amendment Civil Liberty to Keep And Bear Arms being upheld today by the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia.  An American Citize&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92139</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92139</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Appeals Court affirms 2nd Amendment, and, in effect, the Constitution in DC&lt;/strong&gt;

Had the city actually set that precedent and successfully claimed to not be bound by the constitution, the possible abuse of the precedent could have been huge.

And the fact is that if the city acts in compliance to the constitution in any place, it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Appeals Court affirms 2nd Amendment, and, in effect, the Constitution in DC</strong></p>
<p>Had the city actually set that precedent and successfully claimed to not be bound by the constitution, the possible abuse of the precedent could have been huge.</p>
<p>And the fact is that if the city acts in compliance to the constitution in any place, it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92138</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92138</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;District Of Columbia Gun Ban Overturned&lt;/strong&gt;

Another victory for gun owners.&#160;AP Reports:A federal appeals court overturned the District of Columbia&#039;s long-standing handgun ban Friday, rejecting the city&#039;s argument that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applied only to militias. In a 2-...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>District Of Columbia Gun Ban Overturned</strong></p>
<p>Another victory for gun owners.&nbsp;AP Reports:A federal appeals court overturned the District of Columbia&#8217;s long-standing handgun ban Friday, rejecting the city&#8217;s argument that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applied only to militias. In a 2-&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92137</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92137</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Appeals Court Nixes Washington D.C.&#8217;s Big Gun Ban&lt;/strong&gt;

A federal appeals court has turned thumbs down on a Washington D.C. anti-gun law that is the kind of law that even many advocates of gun control find extreme:
A federal appellate panel today struck down parts of the District&#8217;s gun law as unconsti...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Appeals Court Nixes Washington D.C.&#8217;s Big Gun Ban</strong></p>
<p>A federal appeals court has turned thumbs down on a Washington D.C. anti-gun law that is the kind of law that even many advocates of gun control find extreme:<br />
A federal appellate panel today struck down parts of the District&#8217;s gun law as unconsti&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92136</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92136</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Court rules 2nd Amendment valid&lt;/strong&gt;

Appeals Court Strikes Down Washington, D.C. Handgun Ban WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court on Friday overturned the District of Columbia&#039;s longstanding handgun ban, issuing a decision that will allow the city&#039;s citizens to have working firearms in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Court rules 2nd Amendment valid</strong></p>
<p>Appeals Court Strikes Down Washington, D.C. Handgun Ban WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court on Friday overturned the District of Columbia&#8217;s longstanding handgun ban, issuing a decision that will allow the city&#8217;s citizens to have working firearms in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Blogue de Martineau</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92135</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Blogue de Martineau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92135</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Racial Profiling&quot; - une mesure justifiée?&lt;/strong&gt;

Connaissez-vous le «racial profiling»? Afin de protéger l&#039;ensemble des citoyens, on cible un groupe en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Racial Profiling&#8221; &#8211; une mesure justifiée?</strong></p>
<p>Connaissez-vous le «racial profiling»? Afin de protéger l&#8217;ensemble des citoyens, on cible un groupe en</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92134</link>
		<dc:creator>Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92134</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Polishing the Glock in DC  - DC Court upholds Second Amendment&lt;/strong&gt;

Another victory for the 2nd Amendment, via How Appealing:
&#8220;BREAKING NEWS &#8212; Divided three-judge D.C. Circuit panel holds that the District of Columbia&#8217;s gun control laws violate individuals&#8217; Second Amendment rights: You can acces...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Polishing the Glock in DC  &#8211; DC Court upholds Second Amendment</strong></p>
<p>Another victory for the 2nd Amendment, via How Appealing:<br />
&#8220;BREAKING NEWS &#8212; Divided three-judge D.C. Circuit panel holds that the District of Columbia&#8217;s gun control laws violate individuals&#8217; Second Amendment rights: You can acces&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92133</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92133</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;The Right of The PEOPLE&quot; : A Second Amendment &quot;DUH&quot; Moment&lt;/strong&gt;

If it please the court, why do we even have a PAC for gun owners? There seems to be plenty of logic supporting the idea of agitating for the positive addition of a new law on behalf of a special</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;The Right of The PEOPLE&#8221; : A Second Amendment &#8220;DUH&#8221; Moment</strong></p>
<p>If it please the court, why do we even have a PAC for gun owners? There seems to be plenty of logic supporting the idea of agitating for the positive addition of a new law on behalf of a special</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn Barber's Corner</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/09/second-amendment-victory-in-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-92132</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn Barber's Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6586#comment-92132</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DC Gun Ban Law Declared Unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (commonly called the D.C. Circuit) today declared D.C.&#8217;s stunningly stupid, misguided, and ineffectual 30-year-old gun ban unconstitutional. (via How Appealing and In...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DC Gun Ban Law Declared Unconstitutional</strong></p>
<p>A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (commonly called the D.C. Circuit) today declared D.C.&#8217;s stunningly stupid, misguided, and ineffectual 30-year-old gun ban unconstitutional. (via How Appealing and In&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

