<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Handcuffing the troops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:35:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Pink Flamingo</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92820</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pink Flamingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92820</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SAT MAR 31  The Boys of Summer Take the Field Tomorrow!&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMBER ALERT&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SAT MAR 31  The Boys of Summer Take the Field Tomorrow!</strong></p>
<p><strong>AMBER ALERT</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church and State</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92819</link>
		<dc:creator>Church and State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92819</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Congress Commander-in-Chief Now&lt;/strong&gt;

And while we&#039;re talking about going to war, who changed the Constitution to make Congress a Commander-in-Chief? Congress has two roles in war: Vote to approve a President&#039;s declaration of war and vote for funding. There is no mention of passing measu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Congress Commander-in-Chief Now</strong></p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re talking about going to war, who changed the Constitution to make Congress a Commander-in-Chief? Congress has two roles in war: Vote to approve a President&#8217;s declaration of war and vote for funding. There is no mention of passing measu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law School Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92818</link>
		<dc:creator>Law School Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92818</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Checks and Balances at work&lt;/strong&gt;

By: Carlos S. Ramirez, Editor-in-Chief
Looks like the Commander-in-Chief will be showing Congress a thing or two about setting war policy.
Congress, in its usual abuse of commerce clause and spending clause powers, decided to set a timetable for troop ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Checks and Balances at work</strong></p>
<p>By: Carlos S. Ramirez, Editor-in-Chief<br />
Looks like the Commander-in-Chief will be showing Congress a thing or two about setting war policy.<br />
Congress, in its usual abuse of commerce clause and spending clause powers, decided to set a timetable for troop &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92817</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92817</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The &quot;Super Majority&quot; Want&#039;s Us To Lose In Iraq&lt;/strong&gt;

The LA Times ran a piece in which they study how the next few months are going to go with the bill to fund the troops: Norman J. Ornstein, who studies relations between Congress and the White House at the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The &#8220;Super Majority&#8221; Want&#8217;s Us To Lose In Iraq</strong></p>
<p>The LA Times ran a piece in which they study how the next few months are going to go with the bill to fund the troops: Norman J. Ornstein, who studies relations between Congress and the White House at the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92816</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92816</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Senate Passes Deadline and Defeat Bill&lt;/strong&gt;

How long will it be before President Bush announces a veto and makes a very public spectacle of the Congressional efforts to not only undermine US national security and strategic interests by setting deadlines and pushing the military to accept timet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senate Passes Deadline and Defeat Bill</strong></p>
<p>How long will it be before President Bush announces a veto and makes a very public spectacle of the Congressional efforts to not only undermine US national security and strategic interests by setting deadlines and pushing the military to accept timet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92815</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2007.03.29 Iraq/Surrendercrat Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Senate Ignores Veto Threat, Passes Iraq War Spending Bill WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday passed the Iraq war spending bill 51-47 after President Bush said he would likely veto the legislation over the inclusion of a timetable for withdrawal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2007.03.29 Iraq/Surrendercrat Roundup</strong></p>
<p>Senate Ignores Veto Threat, Passes Iraq War Spending Bill WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday passed the Iraq war spending bill 51-47 after President Bush said he would likely veto the legislation over the inclusion of a timetable for withdrawal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/03/29/handcuffing-the-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-92814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sandbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=6756#comment-92814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;51-47, Senate Approves Timetable Bill&lt;/strong&gt;

Looks like it&#039;s veto time:The Senate on Thursday defied President George W. Bush by passing a war-funding bill setting a goal of withdrawing all American combat soldiers from Iraq within a year. By a vote of 51-47, the Senate approved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>51-47, Senate Approves Timetable Bill</strong></p>
<p>Looks like it&#8217;s veto time:The Senate on Thursday defied President George W. Bush by passing a war-funding bill setting a goal of withdrawing all American combat soldiers from Iraq within a year. By a vote of 51-47, the Senate approved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
