A Democrat’s challenge on partial-birth abortion

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 1, 2007 09:50 AM

Kirsten Powers speaks truth to the pro-abortion elites in her party:

It’s tragic that abortion rights have become synonymous with modern day feminism. But it’s mind-boggling that late-term abortions now enjoy the imprimatur of every one of the presidential candidates of one of the two main political parties. Many early feminists — the Suffragettes — opposed abortion. They viewed it as an affront to human rights. There is little doubt that they would have recognized elective, late-term abortion for what it is, a gruesome, uncivilized and inhuman procedure.

Feminism was meant to establish women as having equal legal rights to men. Yet, in today’s twisted debate, women are not mere equals. Instead, they have been elevated to a special status where they have the “right” to determine whether a five-month or older “live fetus,” as the court called it, should be partially delivered outside of their body and killed in the most gruesome manner imaginable, even if carrying that fetus poses no threat to their life.

Some elected Democrats ignored this faux-feminist canard, and supported the ban, including Rep. James P. Moran, of Virginia, who said, “It’s not about a woman’s right to choose. It’s about a baby’s right to life.” The late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a pro-choice Democrat, called the practice “infanticide.”

It needs to be said that there is no constitutional right to crush a living human’s skull and suction out its brains, no matter where that life may reside — inside the womb, or partially outside the womb, as is done in the so-called partial birth abortion. It’s immoral and contrary to the values of the Democratic Party, which prides itself on standing up for the weak and voiceless.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Abortion

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On June 21st, 2007 at 10:27 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Partial birth abortion is probably the most gruesome thing I’ve ever seen. Its not a matter of “a woman’s right to choose”, this entire issue is about the right to life of a Child in the womb. What ever happened to LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS??? Doesn’t a baby that is only weeks away form being born have the right to life? If this is truly about a woman’s right to choose, I have no problem with Liberals who want to crush their own sculls in but lets not do it to babys. OK?!?!?!?!?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Choosing Life and Beating the Odds

February 11, 2012 11:50 AM by Doug Powers

32 Comments

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

194 Comments

First, they came for the Catholics

January 31, 2012 10:51 PM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments

The March for Life 2012

January 23, 2012 10:21 AM by Michelle Malkin

132 Comments

Shredding Kathleen Sebelius

October 28, 2011 10:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

155 Comments

Joe Biden ‘Fully Understands’ China’s ‘Millions of Children Left Behind’ Policy

August 22, 2011 07:01 PM by Doug Powers

59 Comments

But it’s unsustainable

The victims of nationalized health care

July 5, 2011 02:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

123 Comments


Categories: Abortion

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook