About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

The $54 million pants suit

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 12, 2007 09:10 PM

That wacky lawsuit involving a D.C. judge who took a dry cleaner to court over his lost pants has gone to trial:

A Washington, D.C. law judge broke down in tears and had to take a break from his testimony because he became too emotional while questioning himself about his experience with a missing pair of pants.

Administrative law judge Roy Pearson is representing himself in civil court and claimed that he is owed $54 million from a local dry cleaner who he says lost his pants, despite a sign in their store which ensures “Satisfaction Guaranteed.”

In his opening statement, Pearson said the case looks at the culture that allows a “group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years,” according to ABC affiliate WJLA.

But as he explained the details of the missing pants, Pearson struggled to get through his hour and a half of testimony and had to leave the stand at one point because he was so emotional.

The case gained national attention soon after the lawsuit was filed. The pants are expected to be introduced into evidence, although the judge says the pants are not his, and the correct pants are still missing.

The sartorial loss caused Pearson to suffer what he calls severe “mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort.”

The defendants, who own Custom Cleaners in the Fort Lincoln section of the district, told ABC News last month that they, too, are feeling inconvenience and discomfort.

They are expected to present their case Wednesday.

Overlawyered has more.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Tammi's World
  2. RightWingDuck

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On June 22nd, 2007 at 4:11 pm, theroc5156 said:

    Disbar this ass

  2. #2
    On June 22nd, 2007 at 10:26 pm, steveegg said:

    If he gets that $54 million, I wonder what we’d have to raise for somebody to “accidentally” lose Old Crusty.

  3. #3
    On June 25th, 2007 at 11:23 am, Bob68 said:

    Question for the general readership: Can the jury come back with a ‘No case for the plaintiff?” i.e. frivolous suit, then award the defendants all costs including their time, lawyer fee’s, mental anguish etc? This suit is really the reason that Ihave never sued anyone. I have always been able to work out my differences without a lawyer. God the system has become so corrupt.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

My favorite new bumper sticker

August 31, 2008 10:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Andrew Sullivan jumps in on Palin’s grandma-gate rumor

August 31, 2008 10:16 PM by see-dubya

139 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

It’s this year’s “Dick Cheney’s Gay Daughter”. UPDATE: “Fair Game,” then and now.

Introducing PJTV

August 29, 2008 04:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

19 Comments | 1 Trackback

Covering Barackopolis

August 28, 2008 05:37 PM by Michelle Malkin

443 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Obama’s Temple of Doom

August 27, 2008 12:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

134 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

House of worship. (Photoshop credit: Exurban League)

Disgruntlement chic: James Carville’s footwear message

August 27, 2008 10:36 AM by Michelle Malkin

69 Comments | 1 Trackback

Voting with his feet.

Security scare in Denver; Update: Doubts

August 25, 2008 08:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 1 Trackback

Hello…Bayh? Update: Or not?

August 22, 2008 06:11 PM by Michelle Malkin

258 Comments | 7 Trackbacks


Categories: Uncategorized


Little Miss Attila

» Okay, Ladies.

Belmont Club

» Both sides now

Power Line

» 40 Million?!