<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards can&#8217;t let go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Minority white man drops out of Dem presidential race</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-230568</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Minority white man drops out of Dem presidential race</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-230568</guid>
		<description>[...] won&#8217;t be missed. Not the cloying, braying sanctimony. Not the hypocritical Fox-bashing. Not the oleaginous class warfare. Not the odious politicization [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won&#8217;t be missed. Not the cloying, braying sanctimony. Not the hypocritical Fox-bashing. Not the oleaginous class warfare. Not the odious politicization [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magicky</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97954</link>
		<dc:creator>magicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97954</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;“political mercenaries and the chattering class”&lt;/em&gt;

A mercenary I am not as I take no ones salt for my political beliefs or actions. 

A chattering class boy, OK by me! I just love the left handed compliments, and the irony of being issued a chattering class sigil by a politician, whose main main attribute is (pardon the unpun) HOT AIR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“political mercenaries and the chattering class”</em></p>
<p>A mercenary I am not as I take no ones salt for my political beliefs or actions. </p>
<p>A chattering class boy, OK by me! I just love the left handed compliments, and the irony of being issued a chattering class sigil by a politician, whose main main attribute is (pardon the unpun) HOT AIR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowboy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97874</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97874</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t see why he pays so much for a haircut. I mean, it&#039;s gotta be naturally shiny and thick with all that fertilizer he&#039;s got underneath it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t see why he pays so much for a haircut. I mean, it&#8217;s gotta be naturally shiny and thick with all that fertilizer he&#8217;s got underneath it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reine.de.tout</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97870</link>
		<dc:creator>reine.de.tout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Titled “Haircuts And Hatchet Jobs,” the e-mail solicitation blasts “political mercenaries and the chattering class” for attacking the messenger in personal ways because they don’t like his message.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Has anyone figured out what, exactly, is the message of His Royal Highness Edwards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Titled “Haircuts And Hatchet Jobs,” the e-mail solicitation blasts “political mercenaries and the chattering class” for attacking the messenger in personal ways because they don’t like his message.</p></blockquote>
<p>Has anyone figured out what, exactly, is the message of His Royal Highness Edwards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97852</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97852</guid>
		<description>Ahenobarbus - yes - define &quot;you guys&quot;.  Like St. Legalize, you refuse to believe that there are people like &quot;us guys&quot; across the whole spectrum of politics.  Only the radical right (what in hel_ does that mean anyhow - radical right) has a problem with John Edwards.  I beg to differ.  There are plenty of people on both sides of the isle - ever moonbats - that have a problem with him.  Sorry, try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahenobarbus &#8211; yes &#8211; define &#8220;you guys&#8221;.  Like St. Legalize, you refuse to believe that there are people like &#8220;us guys&#8221; across the whole spectrum of politics.  Only the radical right (what in hel_ does that mean anyhow &#8211; radical right) has a problem with John Edwards.  I beg to differ.  There are plenty of people on both sides of the isle &#8211; ever moonbats &#8211; that have a problem with him.  Sorry, try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHenry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97847</link>
		<dc:creator>PHenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97847</guid>
		<description>Ahenobarbus.. 

The problem is that YOU guys seem to think the answer to the problems (mostly created by government action in the past 40 years) in our present system are best addressed by...

Government control!  

Now, you look up the facts, because Edwards made his millions suing doctors for not performing cesearians.  He claimed that natural birth caused birth defects.  

Because of his actions, it became hard to find an OBGYN who would allow natural birth.  Meaning thousands of unnecessary cesarians were performed, at greater cost and danger to women having children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahenobarbus.. </p>
<p>The problem is that YOU guys seem to think the answer to the problems (mostly created by government action in the past 40 years) in our present system are best addressed by&#8230;</p>
<p>Government control!  </p>
<p>Now, you look up the facts, because Edwards made his millions suing doctors for not performing cesearians.  He claimed that natural birth caused birth defects.  </p>
<p>Because of his actions, it became hard to find an OBGYN who would allow natural birth.  Meaning thousands of unnecessary cesarians were performed, at greater cost and danger to women having children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahenobarbus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97830</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahenobarbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97830</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the problem &lt;strong&gt;PHenry&lt;/strong&gt;, you guys still think the bulk of inefficiencies in our healthcare system are due to lawsuits, instead of the insurance industry squeezing ever last cent out of our Doctors.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/bp157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The frivolous case for tort law change&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Tort litigation has been blamed for driving liability insurance premiums to excessive levels, reducing real wages and overall employment, undermining corporate profits, dampening productivity growth, discouraging research and development, and generally reducing the willingness of corporations and individuals to take reasonable risks (such as introducing new products) that may benefit themselves and society. There is scant evidence for any of these claims.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/2007/05/31/hewest.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;West &#039;on verge of medical crisis&#039;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Poorly focused treatment, inappropriate prescribing and misuse of medical technology were pushing health budgets ever higher in countries with ageing populations.

In light of double-digit growth in healthcare spending - whether in national budgets or in insurance premiums - Dr McClellan said strides in quality of care could be expected. People were living longer, but quality of care was not keeping up with sharply rising expenditure.

&quot;Treatment is not very well focused; it is overused, underused and misused,&quot; he told a recent meeting in Westminster of senior NHS officials, doctors and health policy planners. &quot;We are not getting very good value - there&#039;s a big disconnect between what people pay and what they get.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just to start the discussion on three wrong assertions you made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem <strong>PHenry</strong>, you guys still think the bulk of inefficiencies in our healthcare system are due to lawsuits, instead of the insurance industry squeezing ever last cent out of our Doctors.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/bp157" rel="nofollow">The frivolous case for tort law change</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Tort litigation has been blamed for driving liability insurance premiums to excessive levels, reducing real wages and overall employment, undermining corporate profits, dampening productivity growth, discouraging research and development, and generally reducing the willingness of corporations and individuals to take reasonable risks (such as introducing new products) that may benefit themselves and society. There is scant evidence for any of these claims.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/2007/05/31/hewest.xml" rel="nofollow">West &#8216;on verge of medical crisis&#8217;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Poorly focused treatment, inappropriate prescribing and misuse of medical technology were pushing health budgets ever higher in countries with ageing populations.</p>
<p>In light of double-digit growth in healthcare spending &#8211; whether in national budgets or in insurance premiums &#8211; Dr McClellan said strides in quality of care could be expected. People were living longer, but quality of care was not keeping up with sharply rising expenditure.</p>
<p>&#8220;Treatment is not very well focused; it is overused, underused and misused,&#8221; he told a recent meeting in Westminster of senior NHS officials, doctors and health policy planners. &#8220;We are not getting very good value &#8211; there&#8217;s a big disconnect between what people pay and what they get.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Just to start the discussion on three wrong assertions you made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97828</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97828</guid>
		<description>St. Legalize 

You ARE joking - right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. Legalize </p>
<p>You ARE joking &#8211; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHenry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97821</link>
		<dc:creator>PHenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97821</guid>
		<description>OK, St. Legalize, lets cover some of the fair haired lad&#039;s issues. 
1. He thinks the war on terror (nothing more than a &#039;bumper sticker slogan&#039;, after all) is best fought with a new &#039;peace corps&#039;.  In other words, we reward them for killing innocents.  He defines weak on security.  

2. He pretends to relate to the poor, yet lives like royalty, all the while demonizing those who are successful (like him. )

3.  He made his money by demonizing doctors and nearly destroyed his state&#039;s medical system.  Now he suggests that we need a government takeover of that system to protect it from laywers like him.  

But his hair is perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, St. Legalize, lets cover some of the fair haired lad&#8217;s issues.<br />
1. He thinks the war on terror (nothing more than a &#8216;bumper sticker slogan&#8217;, after all) is best fought with a new &#8216;peace corps&#8217;.  In other words, we reward them for killing innocents.  He defines weak on security.  </p>
<p>2. He pretends to relate to the poor, yet lives like royalty, all the while demonizing those who are successful (like him. )</p>
<p>3.  He made his money by demonizing doctors and nearly destroyed his state&#8217;s medical system.  Now he suggests that we need a government takeover of that system to protect it from laywers like him.  </p>
<p>But his hair is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Legalize</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97818</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97818</guid>
		<description>I love the &quot;logic&quot; of the radical right: Edwards is wealthy, therefore it is impossible for him to speak honestly on issues affecting the poor; Edwards&#039; hair is important, yet the fawning over the faux masculinity of GOP candidates is unremarkable, as is Fred Thompson&#039;s driving around in a prop pickup truck (authenticity).

Just once I&#039;d like to see substantive criticisms of those who hate John Edwards, rather than focusing on hair cuts.  I mean, I know he isn&#039;t a crossdresser, who married his cousin like Rudy, or a serial flip-flopper like Mitt, or a B-actor like Thompson, or a shameless panderer like McCain, or a flat-Earther like Brownback, but there has to be something you like about the guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the &#8220;logic&#8221; of the radical right: Edwards is wealthy, therefore it is impossible for him to speak honestly on issues affecting the poor; Edwards&#8217; hair is important, yet the fawning over the faux masculinity of GOP candidates is unremarkable, as is Fred Thompson&#8217;s driving around in a prop pickup truck (authenticity).</p>
<p>Just once I&#8217;d like to see substantive criticisms of those who hate John Edwards, rather than focusing on hair cuts.  I mean, I know he isn&#8217;t a crossdresser, who married his cousin like Rudy, or a serial flip-flopper like Mitt, or a B-actor like Thompson, or a shameless panderer like McCain, or a flat-Earther like Brownback, but there has to be something you like about the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97773</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97773</guid>
		<description>I found out insidecable, won&#039;t let you use the word Gay when you comment, when did Gay become offensive? I had to used G*Y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out insidecable, won&#8217;t let you use the word Gay when you comment, when did Gay become offensive? I had to used G*Y</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UniversalUpdate.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97766</link>
		<dc:creator>UniversalUpdate.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97766</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards can’t let go...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards can’t let go&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 186k Per Second</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97759</link>
		<dc:creator>186k Per Second</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97759</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Because $400 Haircuts are still funny!...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Because $400 Haircuts are still funny!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schratboy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97757</link>
		<dc:creator>schratboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97757</guid>
		<description>Edwards: pre-packaged, blown-dry, fluffy-haired trial lawyer. What more could you want in your candidate if you were pathetically weak-minded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards: pre-packaged, blown-dry, fluffy-haired trial lawyer. What more could you want in your candidate if you were pathetically weak-minded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangelove &#187; My precious, precious hair</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/comment-page-1/#comment-97756</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangelove &#187; My precious, precious hair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/25/john-edwards-cant-let-go/#comment-97756</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin post on Pretty Boy John [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin post on Pretty Boy John [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

