The elections in ’02, ’04 & ’06 were not free and fair elections under the first amendment. Who is to say the outcome of those elections would not have been different had the American people been allowed a full, free and fair debate as the Constitution guarantees.

Will we now see mass resignations from the traitors in congress who voted for this abomination, in defiance of the oath they took to support and defend the constitution? I won’t hold my breath waiting for them to do the right thing.

Those who defended their votes by claiming it was not their place to determine the constitutionality of the law they passed deserve a special kind of enmity, and need to be held accountable for denying the American people their first amendment rights these past five years.

Imagine your sweet little 5-year-old being greeted on the first day of kindergarten by a teacher in full burqa, and a court that says that’s Constitutional, too.

So you’re against religious expression in schools? I assume that applies to Jews and Christians then. No prayer in schools? Teachers can’t wear crucifixes, that sort of thing? If so, I applaud your consistency. If not, well, I don’t know what to say.

You can’t possibly mean “I disagree with the faulty legal logic behind Roe v. Wade but agree with the results” Ruth Gator Ginsburg, can you?

Yes, that Ginsburg. Even though I think she grossly perverts the law to arrive at a predetermined opinion, I do think she has good intentions. Questioning someone’s intentions and even making wild accusations about someone’s intentions is a page I don’t want to take from the Democrat’s playbook.

Spacen: I have my doubts on a Souter or Ginsberg retirement. Although I strongly disagree with most of their opinions, I do believe they try to make decisions based on the law and what is right for this country. If I was in their position, I would try to hold on until the 08 election and hope for a Dem. Two liberal appointees replacing them wouldn’t change the current balance, but it would keep it close enough for a possible third appointee (Scalia?) to swing the court back their way.

You can’t possibly mean “I disagree with the faulty legal logic behind Roe v. Wade but agree with the results” Ruth Gator Ginsburg, can you?

Speech advocating illegal drug use poses a threat to student safety that is just as serious, if not always as immediately obvious. As we have recognized in the past and as the opinion of the Court today details, illegal drug use presents a grave and in many ways unique threat to the physical safety of students. I therefore conclude that the public schools may ban speech advocating illegal drug use.

Boulder, anyone?

Watching her go in front of Ted Kennedy would be ….PRICELESS!

This is very, very serious business. Imagine your beautiful, free, American daughters being forced to wear headscarves in the public schools because their bare heads offend someone’s religion, and then imagine a Clinton court saying it’s Constitutional. Imagine your sweet little 5-year-old being greeted on the first day of kindergarten by a teacher in full burqa, and a court that says that’s Constitutional, too. The democrats inexplicable alliance with radical Islam means this election is the most important we’ve ever had.

Be vigilant, and for God’s sake vote.