<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christian journalist invited on Meet the Press. Nutroots go wild!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxforce91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-100675</link>
		<dc:creator>foxforce91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-100675</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Weren’t you conservatives up in arms about Monica Lewinsky? But not about Newt who was having an affair while trying to impeach Clinton for doing the same.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. That&#039;s called perjury and it is against the law. That is why Mr. Clinton was disbarred. You do not get disbarred for having an affair. If Newt had lied about an affair under oath during a sexual harrassment case, then he should be tried for perjury.

I never made that generalization about liberals. I never said &quot;liberals are evil&quot;. Please. Grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Weren’t you conservatives up in arms about Monica Lewinsky? But not about Newt who was having an affair while trying to impeach Clinton for doing the same.</p></blockquote>
<p>Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. That&#8217;s called perjury and it is against the law. That is why Mr. Clinton was disbarred. You do not get disbarred for having an affair. If Newt had lied about an affair under oath during a sexual harrassment case, then he should be tried for perjury.</p>
<p>I never made that generalization about liberals. I never said &#8220;liberals are evil&#8221;. Please. Grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99969</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99969</guid>
		<description>FoxForce,  I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself.  We are all imperfect and sinners.  My point is that conservatives seem to think they should decide which sins are acceptable and which are not.  Weren&#039;t you conservatives up in arms about Monica Lewinsky?  But not about Newt who was having an affair while trying to impeach Clinton for doing the same.  Second, I think John McCain was correct both Jesse and Al and Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell are all &quot;agents of intolerence&quot; and have no credibility whatsoever.  And, I do believe in redemption, so stop calling liberals evil like that idiot Sean Hannity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FoxForce,  I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.  We are all imperfect and sinners.  My point is that conservatives seem to think they should decide which sins are acceptable and which are not.  Weren&#8217;t you conservatives up in arms about Monica Lewinsky?  But not about Newt who was having an affair while trying to impeach Clinton for doing the same.  Second, I think John McCain was correct both Jesse and Al and Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell are all &#8220;agents of intolerence&#8221; and have no credibility whatsoever.  And, I do believe in redemption, so stop calling liberals evil like that idiot Sean Hannity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxforce91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99962</link>
		<dc:creator>foxforce91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; “Thou shall not kill.” So, why is the U.S. (and others) killing people in Iraq.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
1. Because as human beings, we&#039;re not perfect: Jesus was perfect - so when we see someone threatening our lives, our families lives, we fight to defend ourselves. We are not targeting innocent people in Iraq, we are targeting terrorists, who have stated that they do intend us harm. So while Jesus - who was perfect - may have &quot;turned the other cheek&quot; we, for the sake of our own survival, defend ourselves and the lives of our families. We do not live in a perfect world, hence we have to defend and protect ourselves once in a while.
2. You stated that conservatives seem to think they have the right to decide what Christians should believe - if this is so and you believe as a liberal that war is wrong, then wouldn&#039;t the Democrats be just as guilty in your example? If the Dems are so Christian, why did we attack Bosnia? Why did we attack 82 people in Waco, TX under false pretenses? Was that more Christian than the war in Iraq? If not, why didn&#039;t the Dems protest? 
3. Conservatives do not think they have the right to decide what Christians should believe - but liberals seem to think Conservative Christians shouldn&#039;t have any credibility whatsoever. What gives Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton more credibility than Pat Robertson? Would the left have their knickers in such a twist if one of them were to be on &quot;Meet the Press&quot;? I think we both know the answer to that.
4. It seems that you&#039;re the one who is doing all of the judging: you are judging Ann Coulter and Newt Gingrich. WE ARE NOT PERFECT - that&#039;s why we believe in redemption - something clearly you DON&#039;T believe in. 

I&#039;m glad that you thought it was a mistake for the Dems to boycott Fox&#039;s debate. It makes them look weak and afraid and frankly anti-free speech and free press - and given their remarks in recent days, they frighten me as they should you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> “Thou shall not kill.” So, why is the U.S. (and others) killing people in Iraq.</p></blockquote>
<p>1. Because as human beings, we&#8217;re not perfect: Jesus was perfect &#8211; so when we see someone threatening our lives, our families lives, we fight to defend ourselves. We are not targeting innocent people in Iraq, we are targeting terrorists, who have stated that they do intend us harm. So while Jesus &#8211; who was perfect &#8211; may have &#8220;turned the other cheek&#8221; we, for the sake of our own survival, defend ourselves and the lives of our families. We do not live in a perfect world, hence we have to defend and protect ourselves once in a while.<br />
2. You stated that conservatives seem to think they have the right to decide what Christians should believe &#8211; if this is so and you believe as a liberal that war is wrong, then wouldn&#8217;t the Democrats be just as guilty in your example? If the Dems are so Christian, why did we attack Bosnia? Why did we attack 82 people in Waco, TX under false pretenses? Was that more Christian than the war in Iraq? If not, why didn&#8217;t the Dems protest?<br />
3. Conservatives do not think they have the right to decide what Christians should believe &#8211; but liberals seem to think Conservative Christians shouldn&#8217;t have any credibility whatsoever. What gives Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton more credibility than Pat Robertson? Would the left have their knickers in such a twist if one of them were to be on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221;? I think we both know the answer to that.<br />
4. It seems that you&#8217;re the one who is doing all of the judging: you are judging Ann Coulter and Newt Gingrich. WE ARE NOT PERFECT &#8211; that&#8217;s why we believe in redemption &#8211; something clearly you DON&#8217;T believe in. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that you thought it was a mistake for the Dems to boycott Fox&#8217;s debate. It makes them look weak and afraid and frankly anti-free speech and free press &#8211; and given their remarks in recent days, they frighten me as they should you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Intolerance #52: Hating Christians And The Hypocrisy That Along With It &#124; Political Vindication</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99953</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Intolerance #52: Hating Christians And The Hypocrisy That Along With It &#124; Political Vindication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99953</guid>
		<description>[...] Big Hat tip to Michelle Malkin  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Hat tip to Michelle Malkin  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99936</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99936</guid>
		<description>FoxForce, I know you would agree that both sides whine and threaten boycotts constantly.  It is very annoying.  Second, liberals do come on Fox.  The Dems did not agree to debate on Fox News and I thought that was a mistake.  Third, on Christianity, the Bible says:  &quot;Thou shall not kill.&quot;  So, why is the U.S. (and others) killing people in Iraq.  And no, God did not carve out an exception for war.  The Bible also forbids fornication and adultery.  Good Christian Conservatives like Newt Gingrich, Anne Coulter (engaged three times but never had premarital sex), Bernie Kerik, all follow that to the letter don&#039;t they.  The Bible also says that homosexuals should be stoned to death.  Are you ready to attack Mary Cheney.  So, you and your self-righteous cohorts selective reading of the Bible is the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FoxForce, I know you would agree that both sides whine and threaten boycotts constantly.  It is very annoying.  Second, liberals do come on Fox.  The Dems did not agree to debate on Fox News and I thought that was a mistake.  Third, on Christianity, the Bible says:  &#8220;Thou shall not kill.&#8221;  So, why is the U.S. (and others) killing people in Iraq.  And no, God did not carve out an exception for war.  The Bible also forbids fornication and adultery.  Good Christian Conservatives like Newt Gingrich, Anne Coulter (engaged three times but never had premarital sex), Bernie Kerik, all follow that to the letter don&#8217;t they.  The Bible also says that homosexuals should be stoned to death.  Are you ready to attack Mary Cheney.  So, you and your self-righteous cohorts selective reading of the Bible is the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxforce91</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99928</link>
		<dc:creator>foxforce91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99928</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay, I am so tired of whining conservatives. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Vs. the liberals we&#039;ve had to listen to for the past 7 years? Liberals NEVER stop whining! They whine in the workplace, they whine in line for coffee - you name it - they&#039;re obessed and they never shut up! They do it everywhere and in every way that they can: movies, television shows, hell - even as I was watching a re-run of the O.C. one of the kids was whining about Karl Rove!!! So I think you lefties have cornered the market on whining, my friend. For the last 7 years you&#039;ve created careers out of whining so you have absolutely no credibility in calling others whiners.
&lt;blockquote&gt;They do the best they can to not answer Tim’s tough questions and usually fail to answer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
At least they GO ON Tim Russert&#039;s show! Liberals are so afraid of answering a tough question they won&#039;t even go on Fox News! They organize boycotts - you know - like the Nazi&#039;s did.
&lt;blockquote&gt;conservatives seem to think they have a right to decide what Christians are supposed to beleive&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We take it from the Bible, (perhaps you&#039;ve heard of it?) We don&#039;t make it up like liberals do. We give to charity to help people because it&#039;s the right thing to do, we don&#039;t force people to give to charity against their will. We don&#039;t believe in aborting babies because it&#039;s murdering an innocent child, how do you justify being pro-murder? Was Christ pro-murder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Okay, I am so tired of whining conservatives. </p></blockquote>
<p>Vs. the liberals we&#8217;ve had to listen to for the past 7 years? Liberals NEVER stop whining! They whine in the workplace, they whine in line for coffee &#8211; you name it &#8211; they&#8217;re obessed and they never shut up! They do it everywhere and in every way that they can: movies, television shows, hell &#8211; even as I was watching a re-run of the O.C. one of the kids was whining about Karl Rove!!! So I think you lefties have cornered the market on whining, my friend. For the last 7 years you&#8217;ve created careers out of whining so you have absolutely no credibility in calling others whiners.</p>
<blockquote><p>They do the best they can to not answer Tim’s tough questions and usually fail to answer.</p></blockquote>
<p>At least they GO ON Tim Russert&#8217;s show! Liberals are so afraid of answering a tough question they won&#8217;t even go on Fox News! They organize boycotts &#8211; you know &#8211; like the Nazi&#8217;s did.</p>
<blockquote><p>conservatives seem to think they have a right to decide what Christians are supposed to beleive</p></blockquote>
<p>We take it from the Bible, (perhaps you&#8217;ve heard of it?) We don&#8217;t make it up like liberals do. We give to charity to help people because it&#8217;s the right thing to do, we don&#8217;t force people to give to charity against their will. We don&#8217;t believe in aborting babies because it&#8217;s murdering an innocent child, how do you justify being pro-murder? Was Christ pro-murder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99893</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99893</guid>
		<description>Okay, I am so tired of whining conservatives.  Meet the Press is not liberal.  Typically, the first half hour of the show has politicians, most often Bush Administration officials.  They do the best they can to not answer Tim&#039;s tough questions and usually fail to answer.  Then they typically have a roundtable with some both liberals and conservatives.

Do I think it is necessary to have a progressive to balance a &quot;Christian&quot; broadcaster?  No.  What annoys me is, as Obama said, conservatives seem to think they have a right to decide what Christians are supposed to beleive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I am so tired of whining conservatives.  Meet the Press is not liberal.  Typically, the first half hour of the show has politicians, most often Bush Administration officials.  They do the best they can to not answer Tim&#8217;s tough questions and usually fail to answer.  Then they typically have a roundtable with some both liberals and conservatives.</p>
<p>Do I think it is necessary to have a progressive to balance a &#8220;Christian&#8221; broadcaster?  No.  What annoys me is, as Obama said, conservatives seem to think they have a right to decide what Christians are supposed to beleive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puhiawa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99851</link>
		<dc:creator>puhiawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99851</guid>
		<description>yawn, threats from children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawn, threats from children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattsanchez</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99828</link>
		<dc:creator>mattsanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99828</guid>
		<description>&lt;/em&gt;A Christian on MSNBC?  I&#039;m in Iraq, so I can&#039;t tell, but did hell just freeze over?&lt;em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Christian on MSNBC?  I&#8217;m in Iraq, so I can&#8217;t tell, but did hell just freeze over?<em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBoilermaker</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99801</link>
		<dc:creator>PBoilermaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99801</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This seems reasonable to me and to supersean. I think Malkin is creating controversy where there is none. The liberals have done nothing beyond saying they are going to keep track of who’s on the talk shows.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting that you and supersean see it as reasonable.  Very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This seems reasonable to me and to supersean. I think Malkin is creating controversy where there is none. The liberals have done nothing beyond saying they are going to keep track of who’s on the talk shows.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting that you and supersean see it as reasonable.  Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99792</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99792</guid>
		<description>Here is more of the thinkprogress post: 

&quot;The problem is not Brody’s appearance on the program per se, but rather that Meet the Press has an established record of featuring more conservative journalists than progressive journalists during its roundtables.&quot;

This seems reasonable to me and to supersean.  I think Malkin is creating controversy where there is none.  The liberals have done nothing beyond saying they are going to keep track of who&#039;s on the talk shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is more of the thinkprogress post: </p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is not Brody’s appearance on the program per se, but rather that Meet the Press has an established record of featuring more conservative journalists than progressive journalists during its roundtables.&#8221;</p>
<p>This seems reasonable to me and to supersean.  I think Malkin is creating controversy where there is none.  The liberals have done nothing beyond saying they are going to keep track of who&#8217;s on the talk shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geminicontender</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99389</link>
		<dc:creator>geminicontender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99389</guid>
		<description>Raging Rep is correct.  Tim Russert is the &#039;balance&#039;.  Let&#039;s keep our fingers crossed that things like this will only flourish.  Let the nutroots destroy themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raging Rep is correct.  Tim Russert is the &#8216;balance&#8217;.  Let&#8217;s keep our fingers crossed that things like this will only flourish.  Let the nutroots destroy themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Raging Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99352</link>
		<dc:creator>The Raging Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99352</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We’ll be watching to see if a progressive is booked to balance Brody.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do your research Michelle, they already have a progressive booked to balance him on that show......Tim Russert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We’ll be watching to see if a progressive is booked to balance Brody.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do your research Michelle, they already have a progressive booked to balance him on that show&#8230;&#8230;Tim Russert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supersean</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99341</link>
		<dc:creator>supersean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99341</guid>
		<description>DaleC,

I agree with your first point. Air America failed because it does not have an audience not because of unfair business  practices by conservative talk radio. If media outlets want a piece of the pie, they need to put forth a product that people want (which seems like talk radio). It will be nearly impossible to pry left minded listeners away from NPR.


As to your second point I posed a question (how do you see it as confrontational?) because I didn&#039;t understand not because I disagreed. Even if I posted a comment disagreeing (or confronting Michelle&#039;s position) with Michelle, do you really think it is worthy of name calling and questioning my faith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaleC,</p>
<p>I agree with your first point. Air America failed because it does not have an audience not because of unfair business  practices by conservative talk radio. If media outlets want a piece of the pie, they need to put forth a product that people want (which seems like talk radio). It will be nearly impossible to pry left minded listeners away from NPR.</p>
<p>As to your second point I posed a question (how do you see it as confrontational?) because I didn&#8217;t understand not because I disagreed. Even if I posted a comment disagreeing (or confronting Michelle&#8217;s position) with Michelle, do you really think it is worthy of name calling and questioning my faith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaleC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-99309</link>
		<dc:creator>DaleC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/27/christian-journalist-invited-on-meet-the-press-nutroots-go-wild/#comment-99309</guid>
		<description>This is actually good news . Maybe the msm will realize how much money they are losing by ignoring the right .With Nbc on the decline and Fox gaining someone must be taking notice.
supersean, It wasn&#039;t your question but the way you put it seemed confrontational towards Michelle so you have to expect some backlash. Most of us are here because we agree with her views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually good news . Maybe the msm will realize how much money they are losing by ignoring the right .With Nbc on the decline and Fox gaining someone must be taking notice.<br />
supersean, It wasn&#8217;t your question but the way you put it seemed confrontational towards Michelle so you have to expect some backlash. Most of us are here because we agree with her views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

