New York Senator Chuck Schumer (D) is pissy because the Supreme Court of Roberts and Alito did the unthinkable: disagree with affirmative action. How dare they! Racism with liberal good intentions isn’t racism according to liberals like Chuckie. So if…

However, my biggest fear is that the liberals in this nation (to borrow a phrase from our hostess) are so unhinged that it won’t matter what ruling is handed down by the SCOTUS, they’ll ignore it.

A play on that saying by Andrew Jackson: “Justice Roberts has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

My husband and I imagine very plausible scenarios where SCOTUS rulings are completely, defiantly ignored by the left.

Heck, the 9th Circuit already ignores SCOTUS precedent, and we fear that with a Democratic Congress and (shudder) a Democratic president, such rulings will mean nothing because they won’t be enforced.

That being said, we do take pleasure in seeing a notion as ridiculous and backward as racial quotas in schools being ruled unconstitutional. That’s a great start.

At the risk of nitpicking, There is no such thing as reverse descrimination. Descrimination is descrimination. The only reason why we’ve been led to add the “reverse” to it is because the liberal media wants us thinking that it’s so rare that it needs a special qualifier

.
This is a good point.

While the SC was at it, they should have voted against discrimination concerning CITIZENS VS ILLEGALS.

Most county jobs in my area “PREFER” Spanish speaking. Just another way around the EOE law…instead of saying, “WE WON’T HIRE YOU UNLESS YOU SPEAK SPANISH”.

Another one I just love is no employer is supposed to ask your age; the way around that is on your application, they want the high school you attended and the year you graduated. DUH.

I leave it BLANK. I refuse to be tricked.