The diminished credibility of the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 2, 2007 08:58 AM

Update: Chertoff plays down report of imminent al Qaeda attack. Plays up shortage of lettuce pickers. And here’s more Chertoff finger-wagging.

***
Actions have consequences. One of the negative consequences of the Department of Homeland Security’s push for shamnesty is its shrinking credibility. From the dog-and-pony show raids before shamnesty hit the Senate floor to the smearing of opponents during the legislative debate to the inaction of “emergency” border security appropriations after the bill’s defeat, DHS and its chief Michael Chertoff have abandoned principled enforcement of immigration laws for cynical, open-borders politicking.

We won’t forget the frenetic smear campaign that Chertoff waged against principled opponents of the Bush-Kennedy immigration disaster. We won’t forget that while global jihad marched on, Secretary Chertoff was more worried about the availability of cheap lettuce pickers than about terrorist operatives slipping past our air, land, and sea borders.

Now, in the wake of last week’s two attempted terrorist car bombings in London and Glasgow, Chertoff is all over the airwaves reassuring us that he’s got everything under control in the U.S. He appeared on weekend talk shows to encourage the American people to “be vigilant and report any suspicious activities to authorities.”

Uh-huh. This from the public official who maligned vigilant immigration enforcement proponents as ignorant bigots who want to execute illegal aliens. This from the public official who has dismissed strict enforcement of our immigration laws as infeasible. This from the public official who lavished praise on security-undermining Teddy Kennedy as “awesome.”

In a last-ditch effort to save shamnesty, the White House dangled a $4.4 billion emergency border security buyout tied to the deal. Why isn’t Chertoff asking for that money now?

The heroic opponents of the Bush-Kennedy bill in the Senate hammered away at the crisis of confidence the American people have in the ability of the feds to secure our borders. There’s no better illustration of that the fatally diminished credibility of the Department of Homeland Insecurity in these dangerous times.

Be vigilant? Oh yes we will be—with no thanks to Michael Chertoff. He can pay lip service to national security all he wants now. But we know where his priorities really are:

hotair1-whobelievesmichaelchertoff748mov.jpg

***
NRO to White House: Get real.

Posted in: Michael Chertoff

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Lump on a Blog » Blog Archive » Crunching The Terrorism Numbers
  2. PAXALLES
  3. The TIW Blog » Blog Archive » Chertoff: a Chip off the Ol' Bush
  4. The Saloon dot net
  5. Bill's Bites
  6. PrestoPundit » Blog Archive » Homeland Security
  7. Wake up America
  8. Pirate’s Cove » >>Americans Never Quit » Demotivation Monday: What Has Chertoff Been Smokin?
  9. Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian The diminished credibility of the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity «
  10. Thanks, Michelle « jumpin’ timmy
  11. Out of the Amnesty Closet « jumpin’ timmy
  12. Old Fashioned Americanism « Toms FlashBacks
  13. Right Wing Nut House » NEW JIHADI VIDEO GIVES HEART TO TERRORISTS
  14. Michelle Malkin » Lettucehead alert: Chertoff has a “gut feeling”
  15. The Four Color Media Monitor
  16. Michelle Malkin » Diana West speaks the truth

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:03 am, ajmontana said:

    That 4.4 billion and more should have been put to use BEFORE 911 and surely now.

  2. #2
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:09 am, malkin_fan said:

    And wasn’t Kennedy SCREAMING that we must secure our borders last Thursday morning? Where is he now ???????

    I’d rather hunt with Cheney than drive with kennedy.

  3. #3
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:19 am, ajmontana said:

    That was their cheer now “it’s you get nothing”

  4. #4
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:31 am, reppac122 said:

    Chertoff is like the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dam. I would comment further, but if I dared to continue my border enforcement and illegal alien identification rant, Ted Kennedy and Lindsey Grahamnesty might call me a bigot.

  5. #5
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:44 am, KimChow said:

    A note about that $4.4 billion - another ruse. Senator DeMint had the Congressional Research Service look into the particulars of that particular carrot, and learned that “Supporters of the bill say it provides $4.4 billion in immediate mandatory spending for border enforcement, but according to the CRS analysis, the funds could also be used immediately to implement the amnesty provisions in the bill.”
    See:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1857497/posts

  6. #6
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:54 am, josetheguerilla said:

    Don Chertoff has sold out the Americans to the Law breaking illegals, employers and the Mexican government. As we can see with the recent London attacks, nut roots will start to ask, “ Could the government have done anything to prevent this? If so, it’s their fault.” The leadership at Homeland security is setting the Republican Party up for failure.
    Clear the damn backlogs, first!!!!!

  7. #7
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:57 am, Bob68 said:

    Sec Cherkoff, like other Bush minions before him, do the bidding of the President and laud honors on those, even democraps, that support the most minor or major of Bushes initatives. I was a stanch Republican, Bush supporter until this year. Hopefully the next Republican president will rid himself of these political parasites.

  8. #8
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:58 am, WisCon said:

    Yeah, I feel really safe with this guy in charge of DHS. Especially with this “summer spectacular” terrorist event supposedly coming down the pipe, I’m glad he has been spending his time actively opposing border controls.

    This is the type of fool who gets people killed.

  9. #9
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:59 am, The Raging Republican said:

    Its taxation without representation all over again! Nobody in the federal gov’t gets it! We the People need to make a powerful statement and take back our representative gov’t. 2008 is going to be a monumental year at the ballot box.

  10. #10
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:24 am, greysheepdog said:

    8 USC Section 1324a: “Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime”..

    Let’s put Chertoff in jail for 10 years!!

  11. #11
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:26 am, dadling said:

    I have no trust or faith in Mr Chertoff. He has proven himself to be a political animal, without the least bit of common sense, or, concern for the people of the USA.
    His arrogance is only exceeded by his foolishness.
    Time to replace him with someone that is not a political hack. Someone with REAL creditials in security. And someone who is genuine in their concerns for the protection of the Amercian people.
    I can’t say it anymore politely.

  12. #12
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:36 am, Carlos said:

    Send the rinos packing.

  13. #13
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:38 am, tgillian said:

    “We’re going to continue to enforce the law. It’s going to be tough. We don’t really have the ability to enforce the law with respect to illegal work in this country in a way that’s truly effective.” Michael Chertoff said that.

    “Then resign and let somebody else do it.” I said that.

  14. #14
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:43 am, Independent Conservative said:

    As talk radio and conservative bloggers demonstrated, the power of change is still in the hand of the people no matter how maliciously the federal government is trying to shove unpopular decision in people’s throats.

    Chertoff and other Bushies can do little to protect the American people.

    The first line in securing this country lies in the hands of the people who out of love for their country raised hell on the government by forcing it to start building a fence on the Mexican border, and by defeating a legislation that would’ve granted pardons to millions of outlaws.

    The vigilance, the courage and the patriotism of the American people will defeat the Muslim terrorists, not Chertoff, not Bush and certainly not the Communists Democrats.

  15. #15
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:58 am, DanME said:

    I always thought this guy was a dud. When this Dept. was being formed by congress, I regularly email my Senator Susan Collins, who was in charge of writing the bill, to say this dept is too big and will never work. They cobbled together a bunch of different agencies with different cultures. It’s now so big and dis-functional with so many different missions and priorities from border security to terrorism to natural disasters. Every time I see Chertoff on TV , all I hear is a lawyer parsing words….blah blah blah.

  16. #16
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:14 am, geminicontender said:

    I have believed this for a long, long time. Chertoff is a weasel. He must have had the same ’speech therapist’ dingy Harry had when young. Chertoff must go. We want someone in there with ‘balls’. Not an apologist.

  17. #17
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:34 am, Phil said:

    In the wake of the UK bombing attempts, I feel really good that Chertoff spent the last few weeks playing glorified lobbyist for the amnesty bill. Yeah, that was absolutely the right priority - especially as ABC News is now reporting intelligence chatter on the order of pre-9/11 for a domestic attack this summer.

    Thank you for posting this, Michelle. I want to see a reporter stick a mic in Chertoff’s face and ask about his priorities.

  18. #18
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:38 am, Powder Tracks said:

    I watched Secretary Sure-Fool on Fox News Sunday. It is obvious that the President Bush Administration is not serious about building a Wall, sanctioning Tamper Proof ID cards and Employer Sanctions unless we give them the Amnesty they are fighting for! According to this Former Federal DA, the only one allowed to stay on in the Justice Department after Clinton fired every other Federal Attorney, is it is up to Legislative Branch to put forth a BILL. Hello, Sure-cough it was the Senate that put together that Toothless Frankenstein of a Bill that his Boss was supporting. Why? Read Sovietologist Fredo Arias King’s take on this. He is an American educated Mexican National who was an advisor to Vicente Fox. He met with over 50 US Senators on multiple occasions and said:

    Some (US)legislators had also mentioned to us (oftentimes laughing) how they had “defanged” or “gutted” anti-immigration bills and measures, by neglecting to fund this program or tabling that provision, or deleting the other measure, etc. “Yes, we passed that law, but it can’t work because we also…” was a usual comment to assuage the Mexican
    delegations.

    Given that this Author is a Mexican National and not some Conservative “Neo-Con” and our our Leaders in Washington are mostly Pro-Immigration I think he may be on to something. Especially when he discusses that the Federalist Papers indicate that a Key to making our “Inspired” Constitution and System of Democracy work is the “Vigilant and Manly Spirit which actuates the people of America!” Apparently Jefferson speculated “whether Latin American societies could be governed thus?” Read it and then take action aka VOTER IMPOSED TERM LIMITS FOR US LEGISLATORS! The Fairness Doctrine that GOP Senators Lott and Graham seem to support will shut up us “Loud” “Vigilant and Manly” voters and Amnesty may give them Clientelism(”Clientelismo”), a prominent phenomenon of the Political systems South of the Border and Amnesty may give them the type of constituents our National Leaders Prefer! More Malleable….

  19. #19
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:45 am, Alphonse said:

    Sigh. Another Bush “loyalty above competence” appointment. “You’re doing a great job, Chertie.”

  20. #20
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:49 am, Pulchritudinous Patriot said:

    I wonder how we citizens are going to react if the next major terror (or even minor) attack is caused by an OTM who crossed our southern border illegally?

    I don’t think it will be pretty.

  21. #21
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 11:58 am, jeffNWV said:

    Bush has a history of nominating/appointing loyal, but incompetent lap dogs. He had no problem nominating sweet Harriet to the Supreme court, citing her strong abilities. When it comes to keeping his own a$$ out of the fire, he puts the chihuahua away and gets a rabid rottweiler. Mr. President, I want a rottweiler protecting my country.

  22. #22
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:00 pm, Bachbone said:

    I have more faith in the NRA and my trusty Remington 12 gauge than Homeland Security honchos. It’s been a bad joke since Sec. Ridge. Individual Homeland Security members on the firing line know they are led badly. Insiders periodically let blogger Debbie Schlussel know about how bad things are.

  23. #23
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:26 pm, BluegrassHindu said:

    I wonder how we citizens are going to react if the next major terror (or even minor) attack is caused by an OTM who crossed our southern border illegally?

    I don’t think it will be pretty.

    Some of the Fort Dix suspects did just that yet it barely managed a blip. The sad truth is we are in a war for survival right now and alot of people just dont care.

    I will bet you that if something did happen the first words out of Chertoffs mouth will be ” The American people shold have let the Senate pass the Immigration bill then this could have been prevented. “

  24. #24
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:28 pm, Rorschach said:

    The Houston Chronicle was apparently reading from the same playbook.

    Let us fisk shall we?

    The bill did not pass, so clearly it is impossible for it to have had an effect. Could it be that the stepwise increase in interior enforcement might be playing a role? If so, that would give lie to the usual statement that it is unreasonable to think that it is possible to deport 12-20 million (Or is the number really closer to 30-40 million? Who the hell knows?) people.
    Clearly enforcement is having an effect far beyond the numbers of people that are actually being caught. People are not hiring illegals because they are afraid that they might just lose their business or go to prison or both. Just IMAGINE what would happen if enforcement was where it SHOULD be!

  25. #25
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:30 pm, Ralph Gizzip said:

    Change Chert to Jack and I think his name would be more appropriate.

    Oooh… did I say that?

  26. #26
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:44 pm, puhiawa said:

    There he goes again. Trying to use his failure to enforce the law to extort Amnesty. The man is a dimwit. He should be fired along with the incompetents he has put in charge if ICE, TSA, etc.

  27. #27
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:47 pm, msplitt said:

    If this lying, bumbling idiot is all that stands between us and another deadly terror attack, God help us all.

  28. #28
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 12:59 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    Michael Chertoff…STEP DOWN!

  29. #29
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:18 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    You people are so loud I can barely hear my lettuce rotting…

  30. #30
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:26 pm, dennisw said:

    Michael Chertoff has been a good solid loyal Republican apparatchik up until now. I believe he was on the legal team that beat AlGore’s lawyers in 2000

    Now he’s just paddling as fast as he can. He has a frantic and not-credible manner of presentation. He’s so damn awful, his amnesty shilling was execrable

    JUST BUILD A DAMN FENCE, CHERTOFF!! Start mass evictions of the 600,000 deportation absconders

  31. #31
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:29 pm, dennisw said:

    There he goes again. Trying to use his failure to enforce the law to extort Amnesty.

    GW game plan has always been to hold enforcement hostage to amnesty. GW Bush could care less because his open borders polices keep attracting illegal aliens, the numbers of illegals mount up. Much to the mortification of the anti-amnesty crowd

  32. #32
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:32 pm, limmo said:

    Every time I hear the proverbial “Citizens should report any suspicious activity,” I scream “Fifty people are crossing border this second without passports, without going through a metal detector, without screening their backpacks and they didn’t take off their shoes!” But, apparently, no one hears me.

  33. #33
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:34 pm, Powder Tracks said:

    I wonder why Conservative Constitutional Law Type, Senator John Kyl of Arizona pushing Amnesty last week when last year while running for re-election he was against it? Seems that he is running for a new and permanent Position where voting is of no issue….He wants to be Bush’s next Nomination to the SCOTUS! See Federal Observer for details:

    He began his career as a lawyer, became president of the AZ Chamber of Commerce and eventually became AZ Republican Party Chair, ran for Congress and ultimately for the US Senate. He loved the power of being a US Senator, but there was something missing. Rather than having to run for re-election periodically trying to convince voters not to hold him accountable for his voting record, he really wanted to be a judge. Not just a county or state judge, but a federal judge with a lifetime appointment…no matter how blatantly he pandered to special interests or powerful politicians.

    Like JeffWNV says Bush “Lap Dogs”, guess Kyl is another one waiting for a dog bone…These Plutarchs of both Parties running the Country are going to get us killed when Beslan takes place in a Border Town! DISGUSTING!

    Voting them out of OFFICE is the only answer!

  34. #34
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:46 pm, iamsaved said:

    If he can’t enforce the laws on the books then the administration needs to get someone who can.

    By the way, what was he enforcing before the immigration bill was defeated? After all, he was doing his best to convince the public that they will be tough on enforcing immigration laws.

    I don’t guess he sees the irony of it all — he says he can’t enforce the current laws but is criticizing the senate for not passing additional unenforceable laws.

    I think they fired the wrong fellow after Katrina. Where’s “you’re doing a good job” Brownie when you need him?

    I predict that if Chertoff ever does attempt to enforce the laws on the books, he will go after the elderly, widows and orphans making sure the cameras are rolling in order to garner sympathy and show conservatives how wrong they were in defeating it.

  35. #35
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 1:59 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    @34 - Where’s “you’re doing a good job” Brownie when you need him?

    He knows he could be called up so he is out at the mall trying to pull a suitable outfit together.

    All the field clothes he has were bought for New Orleans in the rainy season. That tropical look is no good for the desert.

  36. #36
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 2:39 pm, franksalterego said:

    I think we make a mistake, pointing fingers at “Bush” “Chertoff” “Kennedy” etal.

    Law enforcement begins at the local, and then the state level…It begins at the bottom, not the top.

    We’re making the same mistake, as was made during Katrina.

    The city, county, and state govt’s are complicit in the lack of law enforcement…Let’s not let THEM off the hook.

  37. #37
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 2:51 pm, USMCgramma said:

    What did Tom Ridge know when he retired from Homeland Security (other than he’d get a fat pension?) Returning Special Op Marines will be investigated for deaths in Afghanistan … this is SO WRONG! We have an idiotic failure heading border security, yet the US would punish its own military for collateral damage fighting terrorists?

  38. #38
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 3:01 pm, feralcat said:

    I wish that you all would stop ragging on Chertoff.

    He is a visionary man who is looking out for us all.

    He knows that our economy would fall apart if we did not have hard working Amigos from the south to pick our sacred lettuce, doing the job that lazy Americans would not even do for $50 an hour.

    He also knows, WHAT APPARENTLY NONE OF YOU DO, that lettuce is a wonder plant.

    Someday soon a cure for cancer will be found from an extract from lettuce.

    Someday soon highly fermented lettuce will power all our cars.

    Someday soon lettuce reactor plants will provide all of our electricity.

    A derivative from lettuce may even hold the cure for old age!!!

    And the thing is folks that only hard working Amigos from the south know how to pick the sacred lettuce plant in just the right and loving way to keep it from losing all of these magical properties.

    Have you hugged a head of lettuce today?

    Have you sent Secretary Chertoff a nice card letting him know just how much you appreciate him and the job that he is doing?

    Think about it.

  39. #39
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 3:11 pm, ExCarMagGuy said:

    Chertoff is also commanded by existing law to make sure everybody knows the penalties (1-15 years in prison) for violating Title 8, Section 1324 immigration statutes.

    (By the way, after reading this section I was surprised just how stiff the various penalties are against those who aid and abet illegal aliens. It made me even angrier that Skeletor is not enforcing them. Be sure to click the link and read the page.)

    TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER II > Part VIII > § 1324 (US Code - Cornell Law Link)

    (e) Outreach program
    The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall develop and implement an outreach program to educate the public in the United States and abroad about the penalties for bringing in and harboring aliens in violation of this section.

  40. #40
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 3:25 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again for all you fence haters out there……. No fence; No problem. A mine field would work just nicely too!

  41. #41
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 4:00 pm, bloodhound said:

    Government Service

    Department of Homeland Security: Secretary (2005-)
    Justice Department: Assistant Attorney General, 2001-2005
    Whitewater Committee: Special Counsel, 1994-1996
    Supreme Court: Law Clerk for Hon. William Brennan, 1979-1980
    Private Sector

    Latham and Watkins: Partner, 1994-2001
    Education

    Harvard Law School: JD, 1978
    Harvard College: BA, 1975

    Where are the SECURITY Creds????

  42. #42
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 4:26 pm, Entelechy said:

    This from the public official who has dismissed strict enforcement of our immigration laws as infeasible.

    Especially holding accountable and punishing employers who hire illegal force, technical and other. Nothing prevents him from doing this - yes, very few even bring this major topic (the number one magnet of illegal workforce) up.

  43. #43
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 4:33 pm, darwin said:

    There’s more to not securing the border than just cheap labor. These fools are risking everything politically, and willing to throw the country down the drain.

    Just what is it they have in mind?

  44. #44
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 4:39 pm, Heartland Perspective said:

    This “scolding” by the head of Homeland Security is disgusting but it is absolutely unforgivable to threaten us that he cannot enforce the law because of what U.S. Senators and American citizens did with the amnesty bill. It’s HIS job to find a way to do HIS job.

    I have to say I cannot believe how badly the Bush administration is performing. Any losses the Republicans endure in 08 lies squarely on their shoulders.

  45. #45
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 4:55 pm, nbarry said:

    The buck stops at the Oval Office. The greatest failing of Bush the Younger was not putting our country on a war footing on 9/12. This means, among other requirements I will likely mention from time to time, securing our borders against “fifth columnists.” During World War II and the Korean War, homeland security was known as civil defense, implying that vigilance in protecting our country was the responsibility of each and every one of us, if only to actively assist the authorities. The phrase “homeland security” implies that we leave our defense to professionals. This appears to be in keeping with the business as usual philosophy of the Bush Administration that has caused us much failure and embarrassment.

  46. #46
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 5:14 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Who does Chertoff work for? The Gobalist, or the Mexicans? It sure is not the Americans.

    Fire yourself Chertoff!

  47. #47
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 5:18 pm, Eclectic Infidel said:

    Speaking of the dept of homeland [in]security, whatever happened to the colour code scheme for terrorist threat levels? Seriously, anyone know?

  48. #48
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 5:27 pm, bloodhound said:

    It is still in effect. See http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm

  49. #49
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 5:27 pm, gayle said:

    We are now color blind I guess.

  50. #50
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 5:43 pm, hadsil said:

    Chertoff is our “Baghdad Bob”.

  51. #51
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 6:17 pm, Rick Moran said:

    I have to say that Michelle nailed this one to the wall.

    Chertoff’s credibility has reached as close to zero as is possible while him still being above ground. It isn’t so much his downplaying of the threats it’s an attitude of high handed arrogance that politicizes security - whether it’s border enforcement or defending against a terrorist attack.

    I trust him about as far as I can throw him.

  52. #52
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 6:35 pm, DaleC said:

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that when we take the next big hit Chertoff is going to say it is our own fault . If we passed the shamnesty bill the terrorists would have came out of the shadows and registered .
    He already has that speech prepared.

  53. #53
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Jim M. said:

    It was bad enough when elected Republican officials smeared the amnesty opposition; but, when an unelected official, like Mr. Potato Head(Homeland Security version) starts insulting members of his boss’ party, it is high time for that person to go. Such actions indicate the person making the comments believes he is immune from the views of the majority of the electorate and is is not accountable to the citizens he is supposed to be serving.

  54. #54
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Chief RZ said:

    He has lost all credibility with me.

  55. #55
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 7:34 pm, T J Green said:

    Chertoff - waving the white flag of failure for all to see, but it’s OK… no threat here… move along sheeple.

  56. #56
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 8:00 pm, Leatherneck said:

    The real Mr. Potato Head was better looking, and you could change him up a bit too.

  57. #57
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 8:15 pm, feralcat said:

    hadsil - “Chertoff is our “Baghdad Bob”.

    “Nobody came here. Those bigoted nativist losers, I think their repeated frequent lies are bringing them down very rapidly…. America is secure, is safe.”

    “The illegals are not near America. Don’t believe them…. They said they entered across the border with great ease … They claim that they - I tell you, I… that this nonsense is too far from the reality. It is a part of this sickness of the nativists plan. There is no an… no any existence to the illegals in America at all.”

    “The illegals are not here. They’re not in America. There are no illegals here. Never. They’re not here at all.”

    “Nativist forces learned a lesson the other day they will never forget. We slaughtered them in the Senate and will continue to slaughter them.”

    “We have just killed most of the [bigoted] nativists, and I think we will finish off the rest soon.”

    “There you can see, there is nothing going on.”

    Baghdad Bob” disappeared, perhaps forever. On the other hand, perhaps he will return as George Bush’s Secretary of Homeland Insecurity or el Casa Blanca Press Secretary

  58. #58
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 8:59 pm, runningonfumes said:

    Secretary Chertoff: With all due respect, Sir, it is time for you to resign.

  59. #59
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 9:22 pm, Jim M. said:

    My apologies for maligning that American icon, Mr. Potato Head, with any comparison to Chertoff.

  60. #60
    On July 2nd, 2007 at 10:10 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Lol Jim M. Lol.

  61. #61
    On July 3rd, 2007 at 12:27 am, Brian72 said:

    I’ve had a bad feeling about this giant conglomerate agency we call Homeland Security from the get-go. This whole idea is just so huge it seems unmanageable. Does anyone else smell pork?

  62. #62
    On July 3rd, 2007 at 2:06 am, puhiawa said:

    Chertoff is clearly immune from intelligence.

  63. #63
    On July 3rd, 2007 at 3:02 am, Ombre Rose said:

    How long has Chertoff been in public office?

    Wellllll… that’s tooooooo long!!!

  64. #64
    On July 3rd, 2007 at 8:05 am, ajmontana said:

    The Laws we have on the books now are pretty cut and dried. Here’s a thought consider them the new Immigration reform and start enforcement, quit whinning about it being broken, provide the funds that were in Shamesty Bill and get it together. We need to start our movement for “enforcement now”

  65. #65
    On July 3rd, 2007 at 12:58 pm, marcia said:

    Why do we need the DHS ?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Congress to Chertie: We need more incompetents of color!

March 5, 2008 11:12 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Profile this.

Chertoff: We’re “backsliding” on homeland security

February 7, 2008 07:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

46 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

You don’t say!

The Kerik indictment, Giuliani, and the GOP; Update: Kerik pleads not guilty

November 8, 2007 08:43 PM by Michelle Malkin

106 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

“Coming clean.”

I smell a CAIR lawsuit coming on…

July 12, 2007 08:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Chertie has chosen to lie in bed with the very people who make a living intimidating and suing vigilant Americans who take homeland security seriously.


Categories: Michael Chertoff



Pundit & Pundette

» Is the tide turning?

Weekly Standard

» Anchor Men