See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Bill's Bites
2. Michelle Malkin » More Gitmo catch-and-release

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, taylork said:

   If it were any other country I’d be worried. But I think that there’s a good chance that they’ll just be stoned to death or beheaded…it is Saudi Arabia after all.

2. #2
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:33 pm, geminicontender said:

   Let’s just wait it out. If any of those that were released pop up on the radar again that will be just one more check mark against the Dems. I will bet that some of those will surface. Gitmo needs to stay open.

3. #3
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:42 pm, mnmike said:

   The least we could do is to drop these pooor Sauds off in Syria, as the gateway to the Iraq battlefield.

4. #4
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:45 pm, josetheguerilla said:

   I don’t have enough information on the Saudis detainees. There’re enemy combatants, that’s for sure. But where is the documentation? I don’t like all this secret squirrel stuff. You could always say it’s in the interest of national security, but so is a border fence. Do we have one?

5. #5
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:45 pm, uhangtight said:

   yeah, we may as well just drop them off in the green zone, cause that is where they are headed.. why not just save the red tape of sending them to Saudi Arabia. we can send them to fight in Iraq.

6. #6
   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:46 pm, feralcat said:

   #1

   Or maybe get a heroes welcome?

7. #7
   On July 17th, 2007 at 5:10 pm, Bhishma said:

   On July 17th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, taylork said:
   But I think that there’s a good chance that they’ll just be stoned to death or beheaded…it is Saudi Arabia after all.

   Except, Islam permits beheadings for crimes against the innocent” and infidels are “guilty” of rejecting Allah. So, gitmo guys have done Dar-al-Islam and umma a big favour. Look for full pardon. Sorry!

8. #8
   On July 17th, 2007 at 5:10 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   Gee, last I heard, Cuba was the place to be.

   The best of all worlds.

   Gets the endorsement of Sheehan, Moore and Ahmadinejad.

9. #9
   On July 17th, 2007 at 5:32 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Yeah, the Saudis aren’t going to be administering any punishments to these turds.

10. #10
    On July 17th, 2007 at 5:39 pm, Mike D. said:

    Oddsmakers are already setting the over/under on the number of days it will take before some or all of these Saudis are caught in Iraq planting IEDs or cutting off heads.

    The over/under is 90 days.

    Ima take the Under.

11. #11
    On July 17th, 2007 at 5:41 pm, gayle said:

    I am more concerned with the fact that BUSH is holding HIS hand?!?!

    What’s up with that???????????????

    No French kissing now!

12. #12
    On July 17th, 2007 at 5:56 pm, walterc said:

    Any chance we can move the election up. The longer GW is in office, the more he sells us out to the “islamic moderates” .

    He’s hoping for their help in stablizing Iraq while refusing to acknowledge that they are a big part of the problem.

13. #13
    On July 17th, 2007 at 6:05 pm, gayle said:

    It’s a no win situation.

    If we could move the elections up, guess who’d win? Billary….
    since there are no viable Reps yet.

14. #14
    On July 17th, 2007 at 6:07 pm, Boomer said:

    From my own experiences in visiting the “Magic Kingdom” in the 80s flying combat support missions protecting Kuwaiti US flagged oil tankers I think these guys will be quickly and quietly taken care on their first Friday home at chop-chop square. These people do not play when it comes to dealing out punishment.

15. #15
    On July 17th, 2007 at 7:16 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Speaking of which, when were they supposed to behead that 19-year old Sri Lankan nanny?

16. #16
    On July 17th, 2007 at 7:36 pm, feralcat said:

    walterc said: Any chance we can move the election up. The longer GW is in office, the more he sells us out to the “islamic moderates”.”

    That is when he is not selling us out to the serf master employers of illegals and the ethnic cleansing ruling elite of Mexico.

17. #17
    On July 17th, 2007 at 7:38 pm, feralcat said:

    PBoilermaker said:

    Speaking of which, when were they supposed to behead that 19-year old Sri Lankan nanny?

    Could be anytime now.

    One would think that El Presidente could call in a marker with his buds and have her spared.

    Will he?

18. #18
    On July 17th, 2007 at 11:17 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On July 17th, 2007 at 7:38 pm, feralcat said:
    Could be anytime now. One would think that El Presidente could call in a marker with his buds and have her spared. Will he?

    I seriously doubt she rates high on the POTUS’ list of priorities. What reasoning would he use to ask that she be spared? I don’t see it being something the US has any say in.

    That said, it doesn’t make it any less sickening that she’s going to go under the sword based on shady “evidence”.

19. #19
    On July 17th, 2007 at 11:26 pm, ArmywifeArmymom said:

    [start heavy sarcasm]There is nothing to worry about. It’s not like someone from Saudi Arabia would ever hijack a plane and use it as a massive guided missile to murder thousands of innocent citizens in another Country like America. Geez, you people are paranoid. They are all just nice fathers trying to get home to their children and their cozy arm chair![end sarcasm/]

20. #20
    On July 17th, 2007 at 11:39 pm, Independent Conservative said:

    One thing everyone must know:

    Any U.S. government (Republican or Democrat) cannot and will not condemn the Saudi Royal family. Even after September 11, 2001.

    There is a rule, a line that nobody can cross.

    Washington D.C. and the big Media moguls (like Murdoch) have their hands tight by the Saudis.

    The Saudis are smart. They know the weaknesses of the American people.

    They know that MONEY and OIL can buy people, especially the politicians and the Media.

    In other words, the Saudis have the American politicians and the U.S. Media in their pockets.

    I don’t need to write a dissertation.

    That is the nature of the relationship between America and the Saudis.

    It was like that last century and shall remain the same, this century, unless America decides that she doesn’t want to be a slave to the Arabs anymore.

21. #21
    On July 17th, 2007 at 11:47 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    It was like that last century and shall remain the same, this century, unless America decides that she doesn’t want to be a slave to the Arabs anymore.

    I agree. Sadly, I don’t think it is a pill that we are ready to swallow just yet.

22. #22
    On July 18th, 2007 at 7:03 am, Tantor said:

    The Saudi interior minister, Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, is the guy who maintains that Israelis perpetrated Sep 11. When jihadis went on a murder spree against Westerners in one city, cutting the throat of one Scandinavian guy, Nayef allowed the guys to escape through the cordon of police he had set up. Of course, Nayef is happy to see Saudi terrorists freed. He is part of the evil Wahhabi faction that perpetrates terror.

    When King Abdullah, the Saudi ruler, says he wants all the Saudis freed, that includes Mohamed al-Khatani, the 20th skyjacker of Sep 11, who was stopped from entering the country by a suspicious immigration agent. Mohammed Atta was waiting at the airport to pick him up. He was caught later, fighting in Afghanistan. Those are the kind of Saudis Abdullah wants freed.

    The Saudis are our enemies. The $500K which funded Sep 11 came largely from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries. The Saudi princes funnel the money to the Wahhabi clergy who are waging a war of terror against America and the world. Saudi Arabia must be destroyed.

23. #23
    On July 18th, 2007 at 8:55 am, Independent Conservative said:

    On July 18th, 2007 at 7:03 am, Tantor said:
    The Saudis are our enemies.

    The Saudis are the enemies of the American people , NOT of the U.S. government.

24. #24
    On July 18th, 2007 at 10:19 am, Tantor said:

    Not to split hairs, but the Saudis hate the US government because democracy is blasphemy to them. It is the duty of every Muslim to hate America because of that democracy, as the Saudis say in the tourist brochure they hand out from their embassy here in DC to Muslim tourists. Yes, you read that right.

    However, you do have a point in that many of our people have been bought off by the Saudis and do the Saudis bidding against the American people and the government.

25. #25
    On July 18th, 2007 at 2:34 pm, nbarry said:

    Yes, I also have a bad feeling about this. Unless official Washington is willing to hold the Saudi royal family’s feet to the fire on their propagation of Wahhabism, the “war on terror” is a sham.

26. #26
    On July 30th, 2007 at 9:35 pm, Bhishma said:

    On July 18th, 2007 at 2:34 pm, nbarry said:
    Unless official Washington is willing to hold the Saudi royal family’s feet to the fire on their propagation of Wahhabism, the “war on terror” is a sham.

    Quite right! “War on Terror” was a self-defeating exercise, which it was designed to cover up the real white house agenda of selling out to Islamists and illegal immigration. How elae can one explain increased student visas and arms to Saudis? http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/04/20050425-8.html
    We must work to expand dialogue, understanding, and interactions between our citizens. This will include programs designed to (1) increase the number of young Saudi students to travel and study in the United States; (2) increase our military exchange programs so that more Saudi officers visit the United States for military education and training; and (3) increase the number of Americans traveling to work and study in the Kingdom.