Comments on: GOP front-runner: NOTA!

By: general company

general company — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:42:01 +0000

sherlock said: The MSM strategy for Dem victory is two-pronged:
1. Keep telling Republicans how dissapointed and demoralized they are, to get as many as possible to stay home on voting day.

So true, we have a long way to go. Fred has some work to do, Newt has a lot of bad press to turn around and some of the others needed the early campaigning to get some name recognition. Mitt sounds good and so does Rudy at times. I think our overall group is very good. If you are excspecting any candidate to agree with every thing you believe, then that particular candidate will never exist.
But just like sherlock suggest, the MSM is going to do their best to make you believe none are worthy,,,,,,,,,, beware.

By: Gubatron

Gubatron — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:00:48 +0000

GOP front-runner: NOTA!…

Hi Michelle Malkin!!!,Trackback from wedoit4you.com on GOP front-runner: NOTA! at http://www.wedoit4you.com/archive/2007/07/17…

By: 3Steps

3Steps — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:16:27 +0000

lets see… Ron Paul is a truther being supported by our local kos troll…

doesn’t exactly make me want to jump on that bandwagon.

I want small government, more law inforcement. I want freedom of speech and freedom to bear arms. I want closed borders with immigration reform to create more LEGAL aliens. I want the illegals who have commited crimes OUT. I want CAIR prosecuted… oh wait right.. this isn’t a Christmas list… nm..

I’m not up for picking a president yet… way too early.

By: gippergirl

gippergirl — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:54:00 +0000

bless your little heart…none of us are “pro-war”…we are, however, in favor of defending our nation…think Jim Carrey said it best in “Liar, Liar”: “where would women of the world be if tina turner had rolled over and said ’smack me again ike and this time put some stank on it!’”…same idea, just change it up a bit: “where would the US be if GW had rolled over and said ‘hit us again osama and this time put some stank on it!”…get w/the program people……..

By: ammonrae

ammonrae — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:24:06 +0000

My candidate must be anti-police state, pro market, anti war, and christian right. I see no candidate like this Michelle.

By: Randolphus Maximus

Randolphus Maximus — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:44:09 +0000

Luxterman-

Ron Paul is a nutjob who thinks the US is at fault for 9/11.

Yeah, that’s exactly what he said. 9/11 is our fault. Take a look again (I’m not sure, but you can probably find the clip on youtube).

This thread is about why all the GOP frontrunners suck because they aren’t really conservatives (which is absolutely true, Giuliani wants a National ID card? Come on.).

So regardless of his standing in the polls, I’m going with Ron Paul anyway. It’s a principled conservative vote. I know for sure that any of the other candidates that we put up there will lose to Hillary/Obama/whoever. I also know that with 10 terms in Congress his voting record is flawless. At this point, with the recent scamnesty bill having to be defeated AGAIN, I’ll take Ron Paul and his consistency.

By: LuxEternam

LuxEternam — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:25:05 +0000

Ron Paul is my choice. The Constitution is what matters

Ron Paul is a nutjob who thinks the US is at fault for 9/11. He blew his entire leg off below the knee at the first Republican debate when he let his “Troofer” beliefs slip out. BTW he is currently polling a whopping 0% in the polls.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/07/usatgallup-poll.html

By: Randolphus Maximus

Randolphus Maximus — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:50:13 +0000

It seems like all the Pajamas Media bloggers pretty much think Ron Paul is a “bircheresque crank”. I know because I frequent pretty much all of them. But Ron Paul is my choice. The Constitution is what matters…Rudy McRommneyson will give us exactly what we’ve had 7 years of in W. A Republican in Name Only.

No thanks, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

I’ll take the bircheresque crank with more money in the bank than McCain please.

Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul!

By: DaveC

DaveC — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:53:28 +0000

as for all the guys in the running, I heart Huckabee..

By: PBoilermaker

PBoilermaker — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:52:07 +0000

Newt is a Global Warming Kool-Aid drinker?!

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:19:17 +0000

On July 17th, 2007 at 3:06 pm, Brian72 said:

Well, let me tell you something. Tom Tancredo isn’t Presidential at all.

I think you will agree with me that George W. Bush was not, and is not “Presidential at all,” whatever that means.

The Look and the Image don’t make a President, at least not for me.

#20 rightisright -

Yes, Tancredo and Hunter will make an excellent ticket.

By: gippergirl

gippergirl — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:57:11 +0000

Awww…and Newt was my pick for Ollie North’s running mate…make’s me sad that he fell for that …meanwhile I’ve solved global warming…next time you have a chance have a look at the giant glowing ball outside…it’s called “the sun”…amazing…now can we get back to business???

By: Dasher

Dasher — Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:44:39 +0000

I was leaning towards Newt… but then he went off the deep end on global warming. He lost me. Looking towards Fred now.

By: ThackerAgency

ThackerAgency — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:21:54 +0000

But it was a funny link, thanks:)

By: ThackerAgency

ThackerAgency — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:21:17 +0000

Thanks John,

I guess that crushes my positive America stance.

Although it strengthens his case as a conservative for LESS government and MORE private enterprise.

It also shows he’s on the right side of the immigration debate – though he likely thinks the American government CAN uphold the law with illegals – if they want to.