<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keith Ellison Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:11:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-106058</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-106058</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keith Ellison First Muslim Congressman (Democrat-MN)...&lt;/strong&gt;

	&#160;
	This is the Reason Muslims are not respected  in the United States.
	Ellison compares Bush to Hitler.
	





	Nuff Said&#8230;.

	Ellison bush
Uploaded by dollarsandsense123
	Tracked To: Michelle Malkin ,   Hot Air

Link: 


......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keith Ellison First Muslim Congressman (Democrat-MN)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	&nbsp;<br />
	This is the Reason Muslims are not respected  in the United States.<br />
	Ellison compares Bush to Hitler.</p>
<p>	Nuff Said&#8230;.</p>
<p>	Ellison bush<br />
Uploaded by dollarsandsense123<br />
	Tracked To: Michelle Malkin ,   Hot Air</p>
<p>Link: </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papabryant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105919</link>
		<dc:creator>papabryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105919</guid>
		<description>The &quot;WWI&quot; reference would have been more correct. Kaiser Wilhelm spent a lot of effort wooing Muslims both in the Ottoman Empire and elsewhere in the Mid-East to give himself an ally in European affairs. There was even talk of him converting to Islam (shades of Frederick II). 

The radicals seem to think of Germany as a special prize to be won. Like Europe was a box of Cracker Jacks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;WWI&#8221; reference would have been more correct. Kaiser Wilhelm spent a lot of effort wooing Muslims both in the Ottoman Empire and elsewhere in the Mid-East to give himself an ally in European affairs. There was even talk of him converting to Islam (shades of Frederick II). </p>
<p>The radicals seem to think of Germany as a special prize to be won. Like Europe was a box of Cracker Jacks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105779</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105779</guid>
		<description>[...] Bush to Hitler.  Nuff Said&#8230;.  Ellison bush Uploaded by dollarsandsense123 Tracked To: Michelle Malkin ,  Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bush to Hitler.  Nuff Said&#8230;.  Ellison bush Uploaded by dollarsandsense123 Tracked To: Michelle Malkin ,  Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper1</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105711</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105711</guid>
		<description>Ellison= moderate.. &lt;strong&gt;WRONG&lt;/strong&gt;.

Ellison= CAIR (Council of Angry Islamic Radicals) Sympathizer... &lt;strong&gt;CORRECT!&lt;/strong&gt;

Ellison= Enemy of the state...&lt;strong&gt;CORRECT!&lt;/strong&gt;

Ellison= Traitor.. we shall see, but certainly wouldnt rule it out.

Ellison= Truther... &lt;strong&gt;CORRECT&lt;/strong&gt;!

Of course these are my own observations and in no way reflect the opinions of MM or the contributors of this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellison= moderate.. <strong>WRONG</strong>.</p>
<p>Ellison= CAIR (Council of Angry Islamic Radicals) Sympathizer&#8230; <strong>CORRECT!</strong></p>
<p>Ellison= Enemy of the state&#8230;<strong>CORRECT!</strong></p>
<p>Ellison= Traitor.. we shall see, but certainly wouldnt rule it out.</p>
<p>Ellison= Truther&#8230; <strong>CORRECT</strong>!</p>
<p>Of course these are my own observations and in no way reflect the opinions of MM or the contributors of this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105708</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105708</guid>
		<description>Hi Dirk,
I’ve had American and New Yorker used against me as epithets.  That doesn’t negate either label.  While the term neocon has been used pejoratively by the left and the right, famously by Russell Kirk, it is usually used descriptively.  You are free to view the term however you’d like but it is useful to have a term for the shared philosophies of Bill Kristol&#039;s group and to distinguish them from traditional conservatives.

BTW: Temperamentally, I adhere to a libertarian point of view, as you do.  I don’t plan to stop using the term if someone equates libertarianism to fascism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dirk,<br />
I’ve had American and New Yorker used against me as epithets.  That doesn’t negate either label.  While the term neocon has been used pejoratively by the left and the right, famously by Russell Kirk, it is usually used descriptively.  You are free to view the term however you’d like but it is useful to have a term for the shared philosophies of Bill Kristol&#8217;s group and to distinguish them from traditional conservatives.</p>
<p>BTW: Temperamentally, I adhere to a libertarian point of view, as you do.  I don’t plan to stop using the term if someone equates libertarianism to fascism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirkBelig</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105692</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkBelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105692</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And we also know what Richard Clarke said about Bush wanting to link 9-11 to Iraq right after the attacks&lt;/blockquote&gt;Are you referring to the encounter on 9/12 that George &quot;Slam Dunk!&quot; Tenet fantasized about in his CYA disasterpiece? You do know that Clarke was stuck in France until 9/14 (IIRC) because all air travel was grounded, right? That means that Tenet is lying about what Clarke is alleged to have said.

Yet another inconvenient truth that negates the lies that have been seared, SEARED, into your vapid mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And we also know what Richard Clarke said about Bush wanting to link 9-11 to Iraq right after the attacks</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you referring to the encounter on 9/12 that George &#8220;Slam Dunk!&#8221; Tenet fantasized about in his CYA disasterpiece? You do know that Clarke was stuck in France until 9/14 (IIRC) because all air travel was grounded, right? That means that Tenet is lying about what Clarke is alleged to have said.</p>
<p>Yet another inconvenient truth that negates the lies that have been seared, SEARED, into your vapid mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBoilermaker</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105673</link>
		<dc:creator>PBoilermaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105673</guid>
		<description>Seriously folks, why do you keep arguing with MikeB?  He gets off on insulting Michelle in nearly every post and making pointless arguments that spin you all up.

Ignore him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously folks, why do you keep arguing with MikeB?  He gets off on insulting Michelle in nearly every post and making pointless arguments that spin you all up.</p>
<p>Ignore him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105664</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105664</guid>
		<description>Harry, your &quot;proof&quot; of an alliance between Saddam and OBL is weak.  It is similar to the Hitler-Stalin Pact and you know how stable that was.  Yes, for the time being, they wouldn&#039;t fight each other, but Saddam hated religious fanatics like OBL, but he despised the US more.  At least you can tell the two apart, as opposed to MM who makes no distinction between Saddam, OBL, and Keith Ellisoin.

Rick, I don&#039;t blame Bush for everything that goes wrong in the world, only the [large amount of] stuff he or his administration botched.  I believe Bush made remarks about not making the same mistakes as his father to Robert Woodward.  And we also know what Richard Clarke said about Bush wanting to link 9-11 to Iraq right after the attacks, when he knew very well Saddam had nothing to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, your &#8220;proof&#8221; of an alliance between Saddam and OBL is weak.  It is similar to the Hitler-Stalin Pact and you know how stable that was.  Yes, for the time being, they wouldn&#8217;t fight each other, but Saddam hated religious fanatics like OBL, but he despised the US more.  At least you can tell the two apart, as opposed to MM who makes no distinction between Saddam, OBL, and Keith Ellisoin.</p>
<p>Rick, I don&#8217;t blame Bush for everything that goes wrong in the world, only the [large amount of] stuff he or his administration botched.  I believe Bush made remarks about not making the same mistakes as his father to Robert Woodward.  And we also know what Richard Clarke said about Bush wanting to link 9-11 to Iraq right after the attacks, when he knew very well Saddam had nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirkBelig</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105639</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkBelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105639</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While neocon is a loose term (as are liberal and conservative). Many political savvy and influential people use the term as a way of organizing political thinking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nope. As I said, &quot;neocon&quot; is used by liberals as a smear word to label someone a Nazi. Words lose their true meanings once liberals speak them. Reality is incompatible with liberal behaviors and beliefs.

I&#039;ve been called a fascist and had volumes of text in German posted in my direction in response to mentioning that I was a small-L libertarian. Get that? To liberals, libertarian = Nazi, er, neocon. The madness of the mad (i.e. angry.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While neocon is a loose term (as are liberal and conservative). Many political savvy and influential people use the term as a way of organizing political thinking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope. As I said, &#8220;neocon&#8221; is used by liberals as a smear word to label someone a Nazi. Words lose their true meanings once liberals speak them. Reality is incompatible with liberal behaviors and beliefs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been called a fascist and had volumes of text in German posted in my direction in response to mentioning that I was a small-L libertarian. Get that? To liberals, libertarian = Nazi, er, neocon. The madness of the mad (i.e. angry.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105599</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105599</guid>
		<description>DirkBelig &amp; jferg49,
Neoconservative is a term that has been used by many conservatives since the cold war to identify a  branch of conservative thought.  Bill Kristol’s father, Irving, considered by some to be the founder of neoconservatives described a neocon as a “liberal mugged by reality”.  Bill Kristol’s PNAC is perhaps the most important think tank for neoconservative thought.  You can read their principles at the newamericancentury website.  It is signed by influential individuals such as Dick Cheney, Donal Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams and Jeb Bush.

More traditional conservatives, for instance William F. Buckley, Pat Buchanan or George Will, have been critical of neoconservative positions on issues such as immigration and the projection of military power.

While neocon is a loose term (as are liberal and conservative).  Many political savvy and influential people use the term as a way of organizing political thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DirkBelig &amp; jferg49,<br />
Neoconservative is a term that has been used by many conservatives since the cold war to identify a  branch of conservative thought.  Bill Kristol’s father, Irving, considered by some to be the founder of neoconservatives described a neocon as a “liberal mugged by reality”.  Bill Kristol’s PNAC is perhaps the most important think tank for neoconservative thought.  You can read their principles at the newamericancentury website.  It is signed by influential individuals such as Dick Cheney, Donal Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams and Jeb Bush.</p>
<p>More traditional conservatives, for instance William F. Buckley, Pat Buchanan or George Will, have been critical of neoconservative positions on issues such as immigration and the projection of military power.</p>
<p>While neocon is a loose term (as are liberal and conservative).  Many political savvy and influential people use the term as a way of organizing political thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105591</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105591</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The rest of Afghanistan is run by warlords (who make money from Opium) and the Taliban is coming back. Why? Because instead of fighting the people who carried out 9-11 we got diverted to Iraq, to fight Saddam because W wanted to prove he’s not his father and can “take out” Saddam, unlike his father who actually listened to allies...&lt;/em&gt;

First, you have no proof of that BS about Bush. None. Zero. Zilch. Bush has never said anything like that. No one close to him has ever said anything like that. The only people who have are people like you - doing a pissant job of extremely amatuer psychoanalyzing. 

That, my friend IS a talking point.

As for Afghanistan, considering that no one has ever been able to govern that country - no one. ever. - to say that the reason things are not going well is because Bush went into Iraq flies in the face of reality. We have 35,000 NATO troops in there along with 30,000 Americans.

Are you seriously trying to say that 5 years after we overthrew the Taliban that we would have more troops there? It was ALWAYS the plan to get NATO involved. It was ALWAYS the plan not to have too many of our troops there. 

Your hindsight is incredible, btw, because OBL is not the problem in Afghanistan. No one could have forseen Musharraf caving in to the tribes in the NWFP thus allowing the Taliban to regain strength and give al-Qaeda some breathing space. North and South Waziristan became bases that numerous attacks have been launched against targets in Afghanistan. That is not Bush&#039;s fault nor the fault of the US. It is a direct result of Musharraf&#039;s short sightedness which could not have been forseen even by a soothsayer like you nor could the US have done anything about it - without hearing screams of protest from the left about Bush making Musharraf his puppet.

Bush cannot be blamed for every thing that goes wrong in the world. If a mosquito sneezes in Madagascar, it&#039;s Bush&#039;s fault according to people like you. That is a stupid, shallow, idiotic notion that the left mindlessly carries on with despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.

Stop with the talking points and think for yourself for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The rest of Afghanistan is run by warlords (who make money from Opium) and the Taliban is coming back. Why? Because instead of fighting the people who carried out 9-11 we got diverted to Iraq, to fight Saddam because W wanted to prove he’s not his father and can “take out” Saddam, unlike his father who actually listened to allies&#8230;</em></p>
<p>First, you have no proof of that BS about Bush. None. Zero. Zilch. Bush has never said anything like that. No one close to him has ever said anything like that. The only people who have are people like you &#8211; doing a pissant job of extremely amatuer psychoanalyzing. </p>
<p>That, my friend IS a talking point.</p>
<p>As for Afghanistan, considering that no one has ever been able to govern that country &#8211; no one. ever. &#8211; to say that the reason things are not going well is because Bush went into Iraq flies in the face of reality. We have 35,000 NATO troops in there along with 30,000 Americans.</p>
<p>Are you seriously trying to say that 5 years after we overthrew the Taliban that we would have more troops there? It was ALWAYS the plan to get NATO involved. It was ALWAYS the plan not to have too many of our troops there. </p>
<p>Your hindsight is incredible, btw, because OBL is not the problem in Afghanistan. No one could have forseen Musharraf caving in to the tribes in the NWFP thus allowing the Taliban to regain strength and give al-Qaeda some breathing space. North and South Waziristan became bases that numerous attacks have been launched against targets in Afghanistan. That is not Bush&#8217;s fault nor the fault of the US. It is a direct result of Musharraf&#8217;s short sightedness which could not have been forseen even by a soothsayer like you nor could the US have done anything about it &#8211; without hearing screams of protest from the left about Bush making Musharraf his puppet.</p>
<p>Bush cannot be blamed for every thing that goes wrong in the world. If a mosquito sneezes in Madagascar, it&#8217;s Bush&#8217;s fault according to people like you. That is a stupid, shallow, idiotic notion that the left mindlessly carries on with despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>Stop with the talking points and think for yourself for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarryStar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105582</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105582</guid>
		<description>Mike,

As far as a connection between Iraq &amp; Al Qaeda, there are numereous instances between them.  

Included among them is OBL&#039;s indctment written up in 1998 by..DUM DUM DUMMMMMM....Bill Clinton&#039;s Justice Department.

Part of that indctment for Osama, written up by the Justice Dept says the following:

&lt;strong&gt;Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezballah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>As far as a connection between Iraq &amp; Al Qaeda, there are numereous instances between them.  </p>
<p>Included among them is OBL&#8217;s indctment written up in 1998 by..DUM DUM DUMMMMMM&#8230;.Bill Clinton&#8217;s Justice Department.</p>
<p>Part of that indctment for Osama, written up by the Justice Dept says the following:</p>
<p><strong>Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezballah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States.</strong> <strong>In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarryStar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105580</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105580</guid>
		<description>Mike,

As far as Darfur goes, yes, &quot;something&quot; should be done.  That&#039;s where the feckless United Nations stands up so loud and says, &quot;We&#039;re not going to take it anymore&quot;.  The United States is taking the battle to Iraq &amp; Al Qaeda that other are afraid to get involved with.

Where is the United Nations on Darfur???  Where are the French who want to be a super power?  Becoming a super power involves the supreme sacrifice.

The United Nations doesn&#039;t want to get involved because it&#039;s NOT going to be dropping bombs (i.e. Kosovo which I supported) but rather true &quot;boots on the ground&quot;.  Getting right in the middle of the genoicde and most countries outside of the U.S, Great Britan, Australia, etc don&#039;t want to get bloodied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>As far as Darfur goes, yes, &#8220;something&#8221; should be done.  That&#8217;s where the feckless United Nations stands up so loud and says, &#8220;We&#8217;re not going to take it anymore&#8221;.  The United States is taking the battle to Iraq &amp; Al Qaeda that other are afraid to get involved with.</p>
<p>Where is the United Nations on Darfur???  Where are the French who want to be a super power?  Becoming a super power involves the supreme sacrifice.</p>
<p>The United Nations doesn&#8217;t want to get involved because it&#8217;s NOT going to be dropping bombs (i.e. Kosovo which I supported) but rather true &#8220;boots on the ground&#8221;.  Getting right in the middle of the genoicde and most countries outside of the U.S, Great Britan, Australia, etc don&#8217;t want to get bloodied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105574</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105574</guid>
		<description>Harry, if you are so concerned about genocide, how come I don&#039;t hear your plan on Darfur?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, if you are so concerned about genocide, how come I don&#8217;t hear your plan on Darfur?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-105569</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/17/keith-ellison-watch/#comment-105569</guid>
		<description>Harry B, I am not one who blindly supports Democrats in all circumstances.  The Bay of Pigs was a disaster and wrong and Kennedy admitted that.  Unlike Kennedy, Bush and his toadies (Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, Limbaugh) never admit mistakes.

Yes, Afghanistan did not invade us, but Al Quida&#039;s headquarters was in Afghanistan where they combined with the Taliban to rule that country.  Please note:  They were not in IRAQ until we went to Iraq.  Bush has made it less safe for Americans than more safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry B, I am not one who blindly supports Democrats in all circumstances.  The Bay of Pigs was a disaster and wrong and Kennedy admitted that.  Unlike Kennedy, Bush and his toadies (Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, Limbaugh) never admit mistakes.</p>
<p>Yes, Afghanistan did not invade us, but Al Quida&#8217;s headquarters was in Afghanistan where they combined with the Taliban to rule that country.  Please note:  They were not in IRAQ until we went to Iraq.  Bush has made it less safe for Americans than more safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
