<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does your senator support voter fraud?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:57:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Indiana Democrats suspicious of Republicans voting in primary, not so suspicious of illegal aliens</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-279081</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Indiana Democrats suspicious of Republicans voting in primary, not so suspicious of illegal aliens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-279081</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t want to lift Karl&#8217;s whole post so follow the link to PW for the punchline. Needless to say, the boss&#8217;s fans will not be surprised to find the left&#8217;s position on this issue highly nuanced. In fact, it actually came before the U.S. Senate last summer. Note which presidential candidate is to be found among the 54 nays. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t want to lift Karl&#8217;s whole post so follow the link to PW for the punchline. Needless to say, the boss&#8217;s fans will not be surprised to find the left&#8217;s position on this issue highly nuanced. In fact, it actually came before the U.S. Senate last summer. Note which presidential candidate is to be found among the 54 nays. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lawless Government &#124; Adam's Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-108229</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lawless Government &#124; Adam's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-108229</guid>
		<description>[...] we talk about how Congress refuses to defend the franchise (Hat Tip: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/07/democrats-support-voter-fraud.html.) from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we talk about how Congress refuses to defend the franchise (Hat Tip: <a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/07/democrats-support-voter-fraud.html.) from" rel="nofollow">http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/07/democrats-support-voter-fraud.html.) from</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Raza ready to combat a wave of Hate. &#171; As I See It Now</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-108107</link>
		<dc:creator>La Raza ready to combat a wave of Hate. &#171; As I See It Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-108107</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, the Senate rejected a resolution requiring a photo ID be presented when voting in a National election.&#160; It was called the voter fraud amendment added to the&#160;student loan bill.&#160; &#160;42-54 and guess which party overwhelmingly voted against it.&#160; You are right.&#160; The Democrats.&#160; Simple quiz for any government educated American.&#160; Republicans?&#160; Collins and Snowe of Maine, Murkowski of Alaska,&#160; and Sununu of New Hampshire.&#160;&#160; Obama did not vote.&#160; More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, the Senate rejected a resolution requiring a photo ID be presented when voting in a National election.&nbsp; It was called the voter fraud amendment added to the&nbsp;student loan bill.&nbsp; &nbsp;42-54 and guess which party overwhelmingly voted against it.&nbsp; You are right.&nbsp; The Democrats.&nbsp; Simple quiz for any government educated American.&nbsp; Republicans?&nbsp; Collins and Snowe of Maine, Murkowski of Alaska,&nbsp; and Sununu of New Hampshire.&nbsp;&nbsp; Obama did not vote.&nbsp; More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Raza hates free speech and an informed American Public &#171; Toms FlashBacks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-108089</link>
		<dc:creator>La Raza hates free speech and an informed American Public &#171; Toms FlashBacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-108089</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin, on Friday, July 20, 2007, the Senate voted &#8220;on an amendment to a student loan bill that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin, on Friday, July 20, 2007, the Senate voted &#8220;on an amendment to a student loan bill that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon77047</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107691</link>
		<dc:creator>simon77047</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107691</guid>
		<description>People, it&#039;s really time we take back our country.  The politicos have got to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, it&#8217;s really time we take back our country.  The politicos have got to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Ross @ Journal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107618</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Ross @ Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107618</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats support voter fraud for 2008!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin alerts us to an important vote that you almost certainly didn&#039;t read about in your newspaper......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats support voter fraud for 2008!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin alerts us to an important vote that you almost certainly didn&#8217;t read about in your newspaper&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runningonfumes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107473</link>
		<dc:creator>runningonfumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107473</guid>
		<description>Oh, yes: And Collins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes: And Collins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runningonfumes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107472</link>
		<dc:creator>runningonfumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107472</guid>
		<description>How worthless can Voinovich, Sununu, Snowe, Murkowski get? (Did I leave anyone out?)

Oh, yes, Brownback, who -- along with Obama -- has been missing in action a good deal lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How worthless can Voinovich, Sununu, Snowe, Murkowski get? (Did I leave anyone out?)</p>
<p>Oh, yes, Brownback, who &#8212; along with Obama &#8212; has been missing in action a good deal lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawCon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107466</link>
		<dc:creator>LawCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107466</guid>
		<description>So after McCaskill&#039;s surprising vote against Shamnesty, she goes right back to voting the party line.  This is typical of her flip-flopping on illegal immigration.  Even though she voted against Shamnesty, after speaking with one of her aides, her real reason for voting against Shamnesty was because it didn&#039;t allow ENOUGH illegals into the country.

As for Brownback, this has become a disturbing trend in KS.  Two years ago when I was a 3rd year law student taking a legislation class with Prof. Kris Kobach, my final project was to draft a bill requiring government-issued ID to be presented to vote.  (This was for KS)  My team and I drafted our bill (incidentally, we got an &quot;A&quot; for our work), submitted it to the KS State Rep., and he presented it to the KS House.  It was buried in committee and never brought forward again.

The most sacred right we have as US citizens is the right to vote.  These cowardly politicians, at both the state and federal levels, are taking this sacred right and knowingly and willfully giving it to non-citizens.  Where does this madness end?  Do these elected officials have amnesty from enforcing the public will?  We, as the rightful American voters, must hold our elected officials accountable and if these politicians do not enact legislation, then they must be voted out.  It seems obvious that many of us are very frustrated with the US Congress but remember that your state congresses are equally culpable for the disintegration of our rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after McCaskill&#8217;s surprising vote against Shamnesty, she goes right back to voting the party line.  This is typical of her flip-flopping on illegal immigration.  Even though she voted against Shamnesty, after speaking with one of her aides, her real reason for voting against Shamnesty was because it didn&#8217;t allow ENOUGH illegals into the country.</p>
<p>As for Brownback, this has become a disturbing trend in KS.  Two years ago when I was a 3rd year law student taking a legislation class with Prof. Kris Kobach, my final project was to draft a bill requiring government-issued ID to be presented to vote.  (This was for KS)  My team and I drafted our bill (incidentally, we got an &#8220;A&#8221; for our work), submitted it to the KS State Rep., and he presented it to the KS House.  It was buried in committee and never brought forward again.</p>
<p>The most sacred right we have as US citizens is the right to vote.  These cowardly politicians, at both the state and federal levels, are taking this sacred right and knowingly and willfully giving it to non-citizens.  Where does this madness end?  Do these elected officials have amnesty from enforcing the public will?  We, as the rightful American voters, must hold our elected officials accountable and if these politicians do not enact legislation, then they must be voted out.  It seems obvious that many of us are very frustrated with the US Congress but remember that your state congresses are equally culpable for the disintegration of our rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107459</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107459</guid>
		<description>How else do you think the Librarian Glasses Karl Levin and the Empty Skirt and  &#039;dangerously incompetent &#039; Debbie Stabenow can get elected and stay elected..  

Michigan is a very nice state but has a some awful senators from here..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How else do you think the Librarian Glasses Karl Levin and the Empty Skirt and  &#8216;dangerously incompetent &#8216; Debbie Stabenow can get elected and stay elected..  </p>
<p>Michigan is a very nice state but has a some awful senators from here..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107393</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107393</guid>
		<description>There can only be one reason that lawmakers voted against this bill: they wish to see massive voter fraud at the polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can only be one reason that lawmakers voted against this bill: they wish to see massive voter fraud at the polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107364</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107364</guid>
		<description>#41, Because they like to waste time having slumber parties knowing that when it was over they would get nothing done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#41, Because they like to waste time having slumber parties knowing that when it was over they would get nothing done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107363</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107363</guid>
		<description>No surprise for California. Our majority are illegal alien voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise for California. Our majority are illegal alien voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xplodeit</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107344</link>
		<dc:creator>xplodeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107344</guid>
		<description>If they required photo ID here in Calif. it would take the vote away from the poor illegals and the Demoncraps would lose 1/3 of their base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they required photo ID here in Calif. it would take the vote away from the poor illegals and the Demoncraps would lose 1/3 of their base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaVentanita</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-107328</link>
		<dc:creator>LaVentanita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/20/does-your-senator-support-voter-fraud/#comment-107328</guid>
		<description>This is a bunch of bull as is the unconstitutional argument.

In Puerto Rico, your voter registration card has a picture of you on it.  Very much like a driver&#039;s liscense and it is a valid id.  Not only does it verify you are who you are, but it also prevents you from voting more than one since it gets punched.  The card is renewed every two elections with a new picture.

There, so simple.  How come our senators and representatives cannot come up with a directive to have all state generate voter registration id&#039;s????  After all, most of us register at the DMV who has already taken our picture.  It would only require the DMV agent to verify that you are indeed a citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bunch of bull as is the unconstitutional argument.</p>
<p>In Puerto Rico, your voter registration card has a picture of you on it.  Very much like a driver&#8217;s liscense and it is a valid id.  Not only does it verify you are who you are, but it also prevents you from voting more than one since it gets punched.  The card is renewed every two elections with a new picture.</p>
<p>There, so simple.  How come our senators and representatives cannot come up with a directive to have all state generate voter registration id&#8217;s????  After all, most of us register at the DMV who has already taken our picture.  It would only require the DMV agent to verify that you are indeed a citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
