Impeach-a-palooza comes to Washington

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 23, 2007 10:47 AM

Bumped…originally posted July 22, 2007 @ 22:37

bushnoose.jpg St. Cindy Sheehan and her unhinged minions will descend on Arlington National Cemetery Monday morning for an impeachment parade that will end at John Conyers’ office doorstep. Similar protests are taking place in the offices of Rep. Howard Berman in California and Rep. Pete Visclosky in Indiana, and at Rep. Conyers’ district offices in Detroit, among others. This is no fringe movement. The nutroots machine has kicked into high gear. Far Lefty Bill Moyers joined the bandwagon with a one-hour PBS special on impeachment last week. Jimmy Breslin banged the impeachment drum in his Newsday column today. Sen. Russ Feingold is crusading for censure.

West Hollywood’s city council passed an impeachment resolution last week–”the 80th city or township in the nation to pass such a declaration, following similar actions in Michigan, Ohio and Vermont as well as six cities in Northern California, including Arcada and Eureka.” Telluride, Colorado approved one last week as well. There is an active ImpeachPAC and there is now something called a “National Impeachment Center” in L.A. And Conyers, via Weasel Zippers, says he just needs to gather three more congressional members and then he’ll move to impeach.

An After Downing Street blogger exults:

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers has said that if three more Congress Members get behind impeachment he will start the impeachment proceedings.

I was a guest today on Bree Walker’s radio show. She’s the progressive radio host from California who purchased Cindy Sheehan’s land from her in Crawford, Texas.

Bree attended an event on Friday in San Diego at which Congressman Conyers spoke about impeachment. Her report was extremely interesting. I had already heard reports that Conyers had said: “What are we waiting for? Let’s take these two guys out!” But, of course, what we’re waiting for is John Conyers. Is he ready to act? It was hard to tell from that comment. In January, Conyers spoke at a huge rally on the National Mall and declared “We can fire them!” but later explained that what he meant was that we could wait for two years and Bush and Cheney’s terms would end. Was this week’s remark just more empty rhetoric?

It appears to be more than that. Bree Walker told me, on the air, that Conyers said that all he needs is three more Congress Members backing impeachment, and he’ll move on it, even without Pelosi. I asked whether that meant specifically moving from 14 cosponsors of H Res 333 to 17, or adding 3 to the larger number of Congress Members who have spoken favorably of impeachment but not all signed onto bills. Bree said she didn’t know and that Conyers had declined to take any questions.

Either way, this target of three more members seems perfectly doable. It’s safe to assume, I think, that we’re talking about impeaching Cheney first. But, even if Conyers is talking about Bush, the target is perfectly achievable.

Cindy Sheehan is going to make sure Conyers keeps his word. Her followers have pledged to park themselves at his office until he makes his impeachment plans official. Meanwhile, the moonbats are touting a possible congressional campaign announcement from Sheehan. More from After Downing Street:

Cindy Sheehan to Lead March for Impeachment, Arlington to Capitol Hill, July 23rd

Congressional Campaign Announcement Possible

WHAT: March from Arlington National Cemetery to the Capitol Hill Office of Congressman John Conyers to ask him to begin impeachment proceedings against Vice President Dick Cheney or President George W. Bush or both. Participants hope to meet with Congressman Conyers and receive his assurance that impeachment proceedings will begin at once in the House Judiciary Committee, which he chairs. Many of those participating have committed to only leave if Conyers agrees to begin impeachment or they are arrested.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been the driving force against impeachment in Congress. If there is no agreement to begin impeachment proceedings by Monday, Sheehan will announce her candidacy challenging Pelosi for election in California’s 8th Congressional District.

WHO: Cindy Sheehan, mother of Casey Sheehan, KIA in Iraq 2004, founder of Gold Star Families for Peace and of the Camp Casey Peace Institute; Ray McGovern, 27-year veteran of the CIA and cofounder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity; Rev. Lennox Yearwood, President of the Hip Hop Caucus; Ann Wright, retired U.S. Army Colonel and diplomat who resigned in protest the day the U.S. invaded Iraq; Debra Sweet, national coordinator of the World Can’t Wait; Dave Lindorff, author of “The Case for Impeachment,” David Swanson, cofounder of AfterDowningStreet.org; Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, both cofounders of Code Pink; Kevin Zeese, director of Democracy Rising; Tina Richards, military mother and creator of GrassRootsAmerica4Us; and many many others.

WHEN AND WHERE:

10:00 a.m. gathering outside the Arlington National Cemetery metro stop. Cindy Sheehan will make remarks.
10:30 a.m. beginning march to Capitol Hill, to 2426 Rayburn House Office Building, office of Chairman John Conyers.
12:00 p.m. noon – approximate arrival time.

“We have the deepest respect for Chairman John Conyers,” Sheehan said, “and I’m glad he’s the one who will lead the impeachment hearings. But time is wasting and people are dying every day that he holds off. The majority of Americans want Dick Cheney impeached. We are bringing that message to the chairman of the judiciary committee of our house of representatives. It is our house, the house of American citizens, and any representatives currently serving there who disagree should be challenged in the next election.”

Freepers plan to be at Arlington to counter-protest. But what about the Republican Party? The BDS-ers are not going away. They’ve been emboldened by the White House’s reticence. And the Beltway Republicans’ idiotic dissing of its own base has weakened its ability to unite the Right when the president needs a strong defense. The GOP needs to do more than just remind Americans of Nancy Pelosi’s 60 Minutes pledge (“Impeachment is off the table…it’s a pledge. Of course it is. It is a waste of time…”). It needs to launch an aggressive counter-attack exposing the shadow party behind the Democrat Party.

Look at these people. Look. At. Them:

impeach911.jpg

impeach2.jpg

impeach3.jpg

impeachaday.jpg

These people mean business. They’re organized, energized, and relentless. They have substantial public support, funding, and legal/academic infrastructure. Does the GOP plan to rely on Nancy Pelosi to fend these impeachment hounds off? If so, they vastly underestimate the nutroots’ zeal–and Pelosi’s fecklessness.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 5:48 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Of course, ironically, women have it much worse in Iraq now than they did uner Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi people seem to want an Islamic theocracy. Islam isn’t exactly progressive when it comes to women’s rights. We agree there, no?

    Sorry, I did not read you right. NO WE CO NOT AGREE. Women were so abused under Sadam. They could not hold jobs or go to school. Girls could not go to school. Today it is just the opposite. My last post said we agreed at 95%. Nope, less than 50% now that I go back. Sorry dude.

  2. #102
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 5:54 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Re: Churchill:

    I see that Mikey failed to explain his Churchill reference and how he’d be in Gitmo if alive and in the in the US today.

    Not hard to understand – it’s loony to even posit the notion in the first place.

    Churchill was a war critic in the sense that he was a hard war man and Chamberlain really didn’t have his heart in it – until May, 1940 when Hitler invaded the low countries and France. Until then, Chamberlain’s big move was on Norway – a big mistake in that all he succeeded in doing was weakening Great Britain by pulling ships away from Channel duty.

    Then, of course, when Great Britain finally realized Hitler meant business, they sacked Chamberlain and replaced him with the guy who had been saying since 1933 that Hitler was a menace.

    Chruchill’s war crticisms were made in the context of him wanting Great Britain to win. Mike B and his liberal friends “cirticism” of our war policy is made not in the interest in seeing us win but to score political points. I would say that they were also made in the belief that it was better for us to lose but I don’t want to hurt Mikey;’s feelings.

  3. #103
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 5:56 pm, bear1909 said:

    Democracy is an idea. America is an idea. The mechanics for keeping it alive is a representative form of government at local, state, and national levels. The laws that provide a framework for governance are complicated and have taken shape over two centuries.

    Attention Moonbats: It has taken us over 2 centuries to reach the near-comical state of disarray at which we find ourselves as a nation today. Can you argue against that opinion? Oh sure. And you probably would. But can you at least admit that 5 years, in the midst of bloody combat against religious fanatics and murderers, is hardly “too long” for a fledgling government to take in finding its way to govern (as opposed to ruling)?

  4. #104
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 6:18 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    You know, I hate that we have lost over 3000 soldiers and workers in Iraq. In 5 years or in 5 months, I would hate it all the same. Our nation sure could not take another world war where we looked at the long term effects of countries and continents ruled under a dictatorship. Back in WWII, we threw men at battles and lost thousands per day. We came together as a country knowing we were doing the right thing for freedom. It has always been America who came to the rescue and led the way to freedom. Sadly, the attitude of the left is – we have ours let them get there’s. Now, we have “americans” who call us repressive to the people of Iraq. Well, let’s just wait and see what a do nothing attitude does for France. Will we have to bail them out again and how many soldiers will we have to throw at that? Bear1909 is right, our democracy was once great but I hardly find the state it is in comical.

    Bear1909, any reference to the great archery company? I love my Bear compound!

  5. #105
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 6:36 pm, gayle said:

    Comparatively speaking, what we lost in MINUTES at the WORLD TRADE CTR pales to the loss of troops in a FIVE YEAR period.

    Now what was the terrorists’ cause again? Need a LIBERAL to answer this one.

    THEY still cannot focus on the REAL ENEMY.

  6. #106
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 6:55 pm, bear1909 said:

    Bear1909, any reference to the great archery company? I love my Bear compound!

    We make our own bows up here in Bear country…lol.
    Wooo-Wooo-Wooo-Wooo! Oh, btw, I didn’t say the state of the nation was “comical”; i referred to it as *near comical*. And you have to admit that Pelosi and Co are a joke. Then there is Chertoff getting a cameo review as the savior of the modern world in TIME magazine (I didn’t know he used to be a federal judge…that says alot). Anyways, any time I see Pelosi Galore’s botoxed mug I crack up at the fact she can’t even blink or lord knows what else!

    Just a clarifier!

  7. #107
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 8:10 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    The Dems are truly disgraceful.

  8. #108
    On July 23rd, 2007 at 8:31 pm, ammonrae said:

    I am silent on Bush. I do not know if we should impeach Bush and Cheney. I’ll stay silent on impeachment.

  9. #109
    On July 24th, 2007 at 11:16 am, BKennedy said:

    I say the GOP is doing just fine on this one.

    With idiots like these, its best just to let them keep taking rope until they hang themselves.

    I say bring on impeachment. Waste more of America’s time and money do-nothing congress. The Demos won’t succeed, they’ll do nothing but drag their feet and accomplish nothing. The nutroots cannot be appeased, and the general electorate will be disgusted.

    The best thing that could happen is caving to the nutroots. They are the mighty mouse: they squeak and think its a roar.

  10. #110
    On November 6th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah #109 do I know you? . . . . or am I seeing double again?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Adventures in liberal tolerance, part 999,901

September 29, 2011 02:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments

Another Day, Another Conyers Family Ethics Problem

November 30, 2010 04:13 PM by Doug Powers

29 Comments

Bush Derangement Syndrome: 4th of July Fireworks Edition

July 4, 2010 12:06 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Exploding deficits, wrong president’s picture

How the Left fakes the hate: A primer

March 26, 2010 10:40 AM by Michelle Malkin

157 Comments

Charlie Sheen demands meeting with Obama on ’9/11 cover-up’

September 9, 2009 03:37 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments

Wild thing

Selective outrage of the MSM

August 13, 2009 07:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments

How quickly they forget

August 4, 2009 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments

Diagnosis: Advanced stage of BDS

March 16, 2009 10:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments

“Patriot or crackpot?”


Categories: Bush Derangement Syndrome,Cindy Sheehan,Impeachment,John Conyers

Gateway Pundit

» Barack The Benevolent
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook