See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Crush Liberalism
2. Wake up America-Dems, puppies chasing their tails
3. Breasts Not Bombs… Big Time Breasts… Bomb… | Stuck On Stupid
4. Bear Creek Ledger » Too Funny….Breasts Not Bombs & Code Pink Protest Hillary
5. Breasts Not Bombs… Big Time Breasts… Bomb… | Stuck On Stupid

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #108522
   On July 24th, 2007 at 5:42 pm, Thomas said:

   *hands out the eyebleach to anyone else who did click on that link*

2. #108525
   On July 24th, 2007 at 5:49 pm, rw said:

   So appearing at a debate sponsored by the “premier propaganda outlet of the conservative movement” is bad because it provides legitimacy to FNC, but appearing on the “premier propaganda outlet of the conservative movement” to defend Kos is good even though it provides legitimacy to FNC???? I’m so confused….

3. #108527
   On July 24th, 2007 at 5:58 pm, Snooper said:

   AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

   DON’T LET CINDY SHEEHAN IN!!

   AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

4. #108533
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, mnmike said:

   Very sick

5. #108534
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, Snooper said:

   To #1…I clicked and was sorely afraid!!

6. #108539
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:18 pm, OldGuy53 said:

   How come they’re all saggy?

7. #108540
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:20 pm, vcferlita said:

   Well, I clicked over tho Zombie’s site. Now I’m a little queasy. Your disclaimer should just read “Definitely not safe” and leave it at that.

8. #108542
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:22 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

   OldGuy53:

   Typical of Liberals – lack of support.

9. #108545
   On July 24th, 2007 at 6:31 pm, feebiebabe said:

   How ’bout – Bras not Blindness

   SF has a power outage at this moment. One must question the timing on this… (maybe good ol’ Gavin forgot to pay his carbon credits for the month) OR maybe some Electical worker became distracted by boobs and off with our lights…..

10. #108546
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:33 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    Or maybe someone sane saw what was occuring and spared the crowd by pulling the plug.

11. #108548
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol jrl,
    I clicked and I’ll never ever quite be the same…..

12. #108549
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:41 pm, ajmontana said:

    I dont think I have ever seen anything that scary.

13. #108551
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:46 pm, feebiebabe said:

    there everywhere….trust me….

14. #108555
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:50 pm, Thomas said:

    ajmontana said: “I dont think I have ever seen anything that scary.”

    Zombie has documented others. Trust me. They are more scary.

15. #108559
    On July 24th, 2007 at 6:56 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Bill: “I never had sex with that woman.”

16. #108562
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:07 pm, gayle said:

    That’s Janet Reno with her hippie wig.

17. #108563
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    I’m glad dinner is two hours away….

18. #108570
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:37 pm, Bruce said:

    Hillary is worried about her left flank.

    You’d be worried too if YOUR flank was a big and wide as hers is!

19. #108576
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:48 pm, John Ansell said:

    Send the members of Sag to Gitmo, we’ll get our intel in minutes.

20. #108577
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    On Second thought, maybe we’ve used them before and that’s why we have the Blind Sheik.

21. #108584
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:56 pm, geminicontender said:

    Being more of a man than any other candidate out there she scares me when it comes to Breasts not Bombs. Does this look like the 70’s? Grow up people. I wonder if Hillary lifts weights?

22. #108585
    On July 24th, 2007 at 7:59 pm, Defector01 said:

    not safe for work? good GOD its not safe for anyone outside of ancient 70s nutroot libs. I oughta sue you and them for emotional distress!!!

23. #108588
    On July 24th, 2007 at 8:08 pm, WisCon said:

    Howard Wolfson, what a liar.

24. #108599
    On July 24th, 2007 at 8:43 pm, corona said:

    On The Factor, Howard Wolfson plugs HillaryClinton.com and accuses him of “smearing” so-called “progressives.” Say What!?

25. #108605
    On July 24th, 2007 at 8:57 pm, Jaded said:

    Let her and the rest of the socialist pigs go and talk to DKos because there will be film and it will go around the internet and every “common cause” comment will be viewed by Independents and Republicans and moderate Democrats and none of them will win, go Hillary go!

26. #108613
    On July 24th, 2007 at 9:17 pm, greenfairie said:

    Look in the background…check out that woman’s look of horror at the spectacle of saggy old hippie boobs.

27. #108615
    On July 24th, 2007 at 9:23 pm, ShoreMark said:

    Thanks for sparing us with the back view only Michelle. Of course, like an idiot, I clicked through anyway…

    On the bright side, if they seem mad now, just wait for the swinging breasts when Hillary moves to the center after securing the Dem nomination!

28. #108619
    On July 24th, 2007 at 9:28 pm, Lindsay said:

    10 Qualifications of Code Pink Gals:

    1) Live in San Francisco, have ties to someone who went to Woodstock or drank electric Kool-Ade with Ken Kensey.
    2)Know all words to The Age of Aquarius.
    3) Own a van with a peace symbol sticker, rainbow, or Global Warming Sucks sign.
    4) Never,ever wear bras–ever in your lifetime– and have the breasts to prove it. Transgenders with breasts welcome. No fake or perky boobs allowed.
    5) Never,ever wear make-up,comb hair, shave armpits or legs,or pluck eyebrows.
    6) Be able to sing off-key songs that rhyme with Bush and Cheney.
    7) Have experience with protests and marches with arrests. Know how to flop as if dead when hauled off by police.
    8)Be willing to ride bikes or march in the nude to protest Iraq war. Boobs not bombs (if your boobs look like bombs that is ok).
    9) Must be a registered Democrat.
    10)Believe that beauty is in the eye of the areola.

29. #108620
    On July 24th, 2007 at 9:28 pm, jpmzo said:

    I wonder who at Clinton, Inc. gave Mr. DKos the order to issue his “condemnation” of hate speech? These Kosites will not be able to contain themselves by weeks end.

    By embracing the hate, along with the idiots at YouTube, how do the Dumbocrats hope to gain moderate, independant votes? Whoever’s running this ship of fools, keep up the good work.

30. #108636
    On July 24th, 2007 at 10:14 pm, deepdiver said:

    Could someone please explain to me what middle aged, overweight, out of shape, saggy breasted women exposing their breasts in public has to do with war? Doesn’t it seem more like an excuse used by middle aged, overweight, out of shape, saggy breasted women to expose their breasts publicly for their own self-gratification?

    The only value I can see in their behavior would be if we took pictures of them at their protests, made up a bunch of fliers with those pics captioned with say, “This is what the 72 virgins really look like” and then air drop them over terrorist strongholds. If that won’t get them to surrender we are going to have to keep killing them.

31. #108639
    On July 24th, 2007 at 10:22 pm, dfern said:

    On a serious note —- I have believed for quite some time that the radical feminist movement is populated by women that are sexually confused, uncomfortable with their sexuality, have chronic difficulty with romantic relationships, and are simply societal misfits (many of them make careers in academia for this reason). The fact that many of them are positively physically repulsive makes one wonder if their radicalism is merely their way of overcompensating for their insecurity and using this energy to lash out at society. The women in these photos are poster children for the radical feminist movement —- calling attention to themselves by flaunting their sexuality, as they have nothing else, and only know how to relate to the world and to others in terms of sexual politics.

32. #108678
    On July 25th, 2007 at 1:47 am, nbarry said:

    I have to laugh. These aging lesbians are the first to complain about women being sexually exploited.

    I am also reminded of Lenny Bruce’s “law of the breast”: if it is bruised, maimed, distended or otherwise disfigured, it is clean. But if it is well-formed and beautifully shaped, it is dirty. “That’s why an atrocity photo is never an obscenity photo,” the great comedian concluded.

33. #108699
    On July 25th, 2007 at 5:08 am, gayle said:

    Lindsay,

    I know the words to “Aquarius” and I am not hippie! LOL!

    Had to learn the song while in the school chorus!

34. #108717
    On July 25th, 2007 at 7:50 am, tommad said:

    re: 33
    DAMN the NEA!

35. #108730
    On July 25th, 2007 at 8:16 am, MikeB said:

    Headline: O’REILLY LOOKS STUPID ONCE AGAIN. Of course, Kos is not responsible for comments made by others on his site.

    I support Barak, but guess who supports Hillary? That right: O’Reilly’s, Hannity’s and MM’s boss: Rupert Mudoch. Is MM going to now boycott Fox?

36. #108734
    On July 25th, 2007 at 8:28 am, Lindsay said:

    Troll exposure:MikeB

    Lame, MikeB. Really, really lame. You totally missed O’Reilly’s point—that no blog is as hate-filled as Kos, and that other blogs (like this one) monitor for foulness.

    Do you have ADD? If not, stick to the subject at hand.

    MM should boycott you. But then it wouldn’t be as much fun to laugh at your stoopid remarks.

37. #108744
    On July 25th, 2007 at 8:42 am, gayle said:

    Supporting a MUSLIM for President?

    Have you LOST YOUR MIND?

38. #108776
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:10 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    MikeB #35 said:

    “Of course, Kos is not responsible for comments made by others on his site.”

    - The point is that on other websites, such as this one, improper and demeaning / degrading / foul comments are either filtered out or taken down out of decency and decorum.

    “Is MM going to now boycott Fox?”

    No – because, unlike a liberal, she is fine with someone having an opposing view. It’s the liberals who won’t go on Fox because of their conservative editorial views.

    I find it funny that Hillary’s mouthpiece talked about how, even though they disagree with some of the Kos people – it’s important to go speak to them. Same thing the Libs all said about Syria, Iran, etc…

    But they won’t have a debate on Fox because the far-left pressured them not to?

    That makes no sense.

39. #108780
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:14 am, zyzzyg said:

    I am not sure of the point, or even if there is one. Should Wolfson have not gone on O’reilly? If he didn’t, the spin would have been, ‘Clinton campaign afraid to come on O’Reilly’s show to defend their position.’ Almost damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.

    Should Wolfson not participate in the Kos meeting because there are posters on the Kos website who traffic in hate? Good greif, we are a bunch of anonymous individuals who hide behind our keyboards, and toss inane insult after inane insult. MM knows this well, because she has been needlessly insulted. And MM has approached this in the best way possible.

    Maybe that is what the Kos website should do. But, to have a third party placed in a position to defend a website for what anonymous posters write is well, … inane.

    The question O’Reilly could ask is, ‘What is your opinion, or thought, on how people who maintain a website that recieves anonymous posts should deal with hateful comments? Should those websites be more like MM’s?’

40. #108784
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:20 am, Heartland Perspective said:

    I think O’Reilly caught Wolfson cold. He wasn’t expecting O’Reilly to read off the vile Kos posts about Hillary. I sure wasn’t. Good one Bill.

41. #108786
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:28 am, collinb said:

    It seems that the real character of Feminism is “showing”. And it’s not very, umm, interesting.

    Let’s trust that they show up at Obama’s HQ as well.

    Collin
    http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com

42. #108788
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:30 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    So, let me see if I have this correct:

    It’s NOT ok for Don Imus to, in a humorous fashion, use the term ‘Nappy headed ho’. In fact, he gets fired for it.

    It’s NOT ok for Ann Coulter to, in the context of mimicking Bill Maher, say that ‘the next time I talk about John Edwards, I’ll just say he should be killed in a terrorist attack’. In fact, she gets raked over the coals for it.

    But it IS ok for:
    a. Maher to say what he said about speculating that thing would have been better if the Vice President of our country had been killed by terrorists

    b. Contributor postings to the Daily Kos & Huffington post and others which degrade, egregiously insult, demean, or wish bodily harm or death on others to remain on the boards without monitoring.

    Ok…just wanted to get that straight.

43. #108790
    On July 25th, 2007 at 9:34 am, Boomer said:

    I was lurking on LGF yesterday and followed the link to Zombie’s report. The horror, the horror! I used to think of myself as a normal heterosexual male, but after seeing that display I can’t get enough bleach or happy thoughts in my brain to clear the images. If the Democrat candidates hitch there wagon to these stars they will hopefully go down in flames during this election cycle.

44. #108864
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:22 am, MikeB said:

    Gayle, FYI Obama is not a Muslim, despite what you might have heard in the wing nut media.

    Lindsay: I believe stupid is not spelled with an “oo.”

    JRL: I think everyone has a right to make stupid (got that Lindsay) remarks: whether in a blog, in writing, or on the air.

    All of you: Bill O read hate filled remarks against Hillary. Isn’t Hillary correct to not let that stop her from being involved? And, yes, I think the Dems should not have boycotted Fox. Bill O’s high ratings mean more money for Murdoch who donates his money for Hillary. Although, like I said, I support Barack.

45. #108874
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:34 am, Lindsay said:

    I thought, with your learning, disability MikeB,and your parroting of Kos’ causes, that you could read stoopid better than stupid, stoopid.

    Look up “sarcasm” in your dictionary.

    Keep your empty comments flowing. You give us all a good laugh.

46. #108884
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:42 am, gayle said:

    MikeB,

    Don’t know what cartoon you have been watching, but Obama is a MUSLIM pretending to be a “Christian” to win votes.

    WE are not stupid on this site.

47. #108888
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:46 am, MikeB said:

    Sorry, Lindsay, I don’t think incorrect spelling is funny. And, unlike you, I won’t resort to personal name calling, like Ann Coulter and to a lesser extent, MM. Calling people stupid or retarded is what you do when your arguments are “stoopid.” Despite my learning disability I managed to get a college and law degree, not bad for someone so mentally-challenged.

    As far as parroting Ko’s causing, sorry, I have more fun listening to the people here’s surreal view. You know the one where we are under seige by Mexicans and Muslims, where the President doesn’t have to obey any law, much less the Constitution, where questioning the war is unpatriotic, unless a Democrat is in office then it is open season (see Hannity on Bosnia). But as I said to MM and all of you our Constitution and the warnings about militarism and unchecked executive power by Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Eisenhower is soooo pre-9/11.

48. #108891
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:49 am, gayle said:

    I smell a noxious odor.

49. #108893
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:50 am, gayle said:

    MikeB,

    You must love us to keep hanging around.

    You are not accomplishing your mission to change minds.

    Lawyer or not, who cares?

50. #108908
    On July 25th, 2007 at 12:03 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    Lindsay,

    I think you meant Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew over a Cuckoo’s Nest. Ken Kensey is an internationally recognized cardiologist with no Grateful Dead/LSD connections.

51. #108983
    On July 25th, 2007 at 1:34 pm, Lindsay said:

    Al,

    My apologies to Dr. Kensey.

    Yes, The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test is required reading for the Kos Kids and the Udders for Usama crowd.Thanks for correction.

    No response needed for Stoopid Troll in system.

52. #109111
    On July 25th, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    Thanks, Lindsay.

    I could’ve sworn Rick put the Troll on warning. The stuff he writes about MM is unconscionable!

53. #109836
    On July 27th, 2007 at 3:11 am, Paulie Walnuts said:

    “Breasts Not Bombs”? I have some more accurate names for this group of wingnuts:
    1) Jugs for Jihad
    2) Hags for Hamas
    3) Freaks for Fatah
    4) Ta-Ta’s for Truck Bombs

54. #109940
    On July 27th, 2007 at 11:45 am, MikeB said:

    So, I see why the Bush Justice Dept. was offended by the naked Justice sculpture–it wasn’t cause it was naked, it was justice.

55. #110043
    On July 27th, 2007 at 1:32 pm, CraigC said:

    MikeB, you’ve just proven yourself to be unworthy of being listened to. Just like virtually all of your nutroots friends, you continually recycle lefty talking points that have been debunked a million times in a million different places, i.e. the story about the statue. Either you don’t care that it’s not true because it fits your lefty narrative, or you’re ignorant, take your pick. In any case, you have no credibility.

56. #110049
    On July 27th, 2007 at 1:40 pm, MikeB said:

    CraigC, I haven’t heard that story as being debunked. Monica Crowley (aka, the Republican “Monica”) was the allegedly offended DOJ employee. If it is not true, I will take your word for it. But, admit Craig, without me, this blog would be as boring as CSPAN.