About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Unhinged mechanic demands troop withdrawal, threatens bombings, murder

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 25, 2007 10:43 PM

stiffler.jpg

Moonbat of the day:

An aircraft mechanic sent e-mails to the FBI claiming he had planted explosives at Utah’s Hill Air Force Base and planned to take six hostages in Idaho, authorities said Wednesday. Five buildings were evacuated Tuesday after the e-mails began surfacing, but the threat turned out to be false and no hostages were taken, FBI agent Tim Fuhrman said.

William Stiffler, 39, was unarmed when he was arrested Tuesday in Malad, Idaho, as he prepared to board an employee shuttle to the base, Fuhrman said. Stiffler has worked on C-130 planes at Hill since 2001.

Even weirder:

Stiffler didn’t identify himself in the e-mails, but Fuhrman said the FBI was familiar with him. He did not elaborate on why.

Local ABC4 elaborates on Stiffler’s demands:

He was led into Salt Lake’s Federal District Court in shackles and chains to hear the charges against him, sending Threatening Communication via the internet, a Felony.

39-year-old William Stiffler is a mechanic who has worked on C-130 cargo planes at Hill Air Force Base since 2001 and where court documents say he admitted sending an e-mail to the FBI that threatened to blow up three bombs on the base and execute an “adult female and several children” in Idaho if his demand was not met.

That demand: to return all military personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan home. Court papers say the first e-mail was sent 12:30am on Tuesday, a second similar e-mail originating from Stiffler’s Clifton, Idaho home was sent three hours later. It got the attention of the FBI’s Public Access Center Unit (PACU) in Washington, D.C. which monitors such threats.

All he is saying is: “Give peace a chance…or I’ll kill you.”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The American Pundit » Blog Archive » Unhinged Moonbat Demands Withdrawal, Threatens Bombings
  2. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Anti-War Morons Vandalize Iraq War Memorial
  3. Bill's Bites
  4. Moonbat Arrested For Terror Threats Aimed At Utah Air Base | Stuck On Stupid

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:42 pm, Snooper said:

    Why is it that these “peaceniks” cannot see their double standards?

  2. #2
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:51 pm, DaveC said:

    when they kill ‘hawks’, it’s for the greater good..

    As well as a demonstrated symbol of his cause, peace, regardless of the means…

    much like a greenpeace activist burning SUVs.. the actual harm to the environment worse than driving the SUV for a couple of years.. but the ‘Symbol’ of the SUV burning justifies the means..

    Symbolism over substance.

  3. #3
    On July 25th, 2007 at 11:57 pm, hadsil said:

    Bombs For Peace!

  4. #4
    On July 26th, 2007 at 12:09 am, josetheguerilla said:

    It’s like a leer jet liberal, except with bombs. It’s only okay for moonbats to use bombs, it’s not okay for everybody else. Give peace a chance!!

  5. #5
    On July 26th, 2007 at 12:22 am, purplepeep said:

    josetheguerilla said:
    It’s like a leer jet liberal, except with bombs.

    Fomerly known as “Jet Blue Liberals”, Josie. Or “progessives”. Or whatever label they’re hiding behind on a any given day. This guy would make a star Kos hate site diarist - he’s got the Kos patented “scr-w them” and psychotic “Kilitary” creedos downpat!

  6. #6
    On July 26th, 2007 at 12:53 am, puhiawa said:

    Hmmm. Another Nut For Hillary

  7. #7
    On July 26th, 2007 at 1:30 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Ah, another spoiled American liberal brat, so angry that the world does not do or behave as he sees fit, he’ll threaten to kill - for peace.

    He had to get the attention of those who only understand war and killing; if soldiers kill for war then why shouldn’t civilians kill in protest for peace; he was only targeting those who create war in the first place; he was so upset with the human carnage brought about by the Bush adminstration that he responded in the only way his limited education allowed; he never meant it, it was a bluff to try to have an impact on the murder of innocents by US troops in Iraq; he wanted to show the Bush administration what it feels like to be threatened the way innocent Muslims are threatened by the Bush administration, and on and on and on.

    Remember how Time described the Unibomber on their cover? “Tortured genius“. (!)

    I wonder which combination of the above excuses will be used by the left this time to again whitewash the murderous and intolerant among their political activist ranks. So many excuses, so little time…

  8. #8
    On July 26th, 2007 at 3:10 am, Citizen H said:

    Now that’s reassuring. The C130s I used to fly in were reworked at Hill. Possible explanation for some of the holdups we had. Maybe this gomer was too busy watching loose change to turn a wrench.

    I pity the rest of the maintenance crew there. They’ll probably have to pull the paperwork on everything he worked on and recheck it all.

  9. #9
    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:07 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Give peace a chance…or I’ll kill you.”

    It’s pretty much the modus operandi of the left…everyone here remembers the pictures of Bush with a gun to his head, the painting a protester held with Bush’s disembodied head, etc.

    They are violent and if they don’t intimidate you with physical threats, they turn to activist judges and politicians to create mandates so everyone thinks in the same misguided, politically correct, peacenik way they do.

    It really is frightening.

    And then they have the gall to accuse conservatives of being violent and bigoted.

  10. #10
    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:10 am, TMoney said:

    Get this guy put away before he can vote! If this maroon isn’t a Hillary or Obama vote, I’d eat my hat.

  11. #11
    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:12 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    The left coast is about to bring out the next Vietnam style anti-war and anti-military movies. Stand by over the next year and a half for the appeasement socialists and pacifist radicals to push the bad soldier/sick soldier psychological junk masquerading as a docu-drama. When you hear a lefty say I love the troops but hate the war, just remember Kerry and Durbin. There is no question that a substantial segment of the Democrat party hate the military, hate Bush, and even hate the country.

    One thing about guys like Stiffler: They have little emotional control and lack any ability to reason in the real world. Therefore, facts and logic have little value. Everything done, no matter how bizarre, is done to advance whatever politically correct cause seems to strike their fancy. I think I just described the modern progressive Democrat (chuckle).

  12. #12
    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:13 am, gregorystephens said:

    These people’s moral compasses are screwed up. Only a liberal would think it’s o.k. to take hostages and threaten to kill people in the name of peace. These are also the same people that don’t want us to be able to protect our homes with firearms because “violence is bad”. Such hypocrisy.

  13. #13
    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:20 am, gregorystephens said:

    On July 26th, 2007 at 7:12 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:
    One thing about guys like Stiffler: They have little emotional control and lack any ability to reason in the real world

    “Stiffler”…I’m sure there’s an “American Pie” reference here somewhere…lol

  14. #14
    On July 26th, 2007 at 8:24 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    gregorystephens #13:

    I was thinking the same thing….maybe at his trial…..calling a family member as a character witness.

    “The court calls to the stand….Stiffler’s Mom”

  15. #15
    On July 26th, 2007 at 8:32 am, MikeB said:

    LOL jrl.

  16. #16
    On July 26th, 2007 at 9:19 am, NeoConNews said:

    I don’t understand how people like this can even exist. Do they actually think that anything they do is going to make the US military, or the Administration, comply with their demands? It’s mind boggling.

  17. #17
    On July 26th, 2007 at 9:30 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    This is, sadly, the effect that ANY strongly emoted cause has on the weak-minded and desparate.

    Whether it is Jihad, or an emotionally charged right or left wing cause, it doesn’t matter.

    People like this, who most likely have emotional issues to begin with, feel empowered by taking on a cause. They feel supported by all the media reports and the protests and hatred. Hence, when they finally act out, they feel that those who also hold those same basic views will support them and they will be heralded for their acts.

    Sadly, in this case, all that will happen is the liberal-far-left will hold this case up as an example of what “Bush’s war” did to this poor man.

  18. #18
    On July 26th, 2007 at 11:32 am, KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle said:

    I wonder what his DailyKos diarist ID might be…?

  19. #19
    On July 26th, 2007 at 11:39 am, NeoConNews said:

    Hence, when they finally act out, they feel that those who also hold those same basic views will support them and they will be heralded for their acts.

    QFT

  20. #20
    On July 26th, 2007 at 12:15 pm, JConrad999 said:

    Since peace never works…

    Give War A Chance!

  21. #21
    On July 26th, 2007 at 1:01 pm, Tantor said:

    MikeB: “But an American Muslim is not an American he is a Muslim.”

    MikeB, in an article in this week’s Newsweek, it cites a Pew poll that shows 60 percent of Muslims age 18 to 29 think of themselves as “Muslim first.”

    If you object to people identifying Muslim-Americans as primarily Muslim, take your complaint to the majority of young Muslims who think of themselves as Muslim first, Americans second, if American at all.

  22. #22
    On July 26th, 2007 at 1:03 pm, Tantor said:

    As a general comment, Hill AFB is the main depot for Air Force fighter aircraft. That means that USAF fighter aircraft requiring major modifications fly to Hill to have them done. I suspect it may be the same for cargo aircraft like the C-130.

  23. #23
    On July 26th, 2007 at 1:30 pm, Boomer said:

    Hill AFB is a major repair depot for C-130 and F-16 aircraft. No doubt they are pulling every piece of equipment this lunatic worked on for “safety of flight.” Having been to Hill AFB several times in my active duty days, it would not be very hard for someone allowed the run of the main base to plant explosive devices were they could cause a lot of casualties. Hope we don’t have any lunatics plotting similar actions at the Air Force Base I’m typing this from right now. This incident only goes to prove Liberalism is a disease that blocks rational thought with feelings.

  24. #24
    On July 26th, 2007 at 2:46 pm, iowavette said:

    Michael, michael, michael…

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Saving JROTC in San Francisco

July 8, 2008 01:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

28 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Scenes from the counterinsurgency.

Sliming the greatest generation on PBS?

June 30, 2008 05:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

124 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Your tax dollars at work.

Save JROTC in San Francisco

June 8, 2008 11:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 1 Trackback

Counterinsurgency in the Bay Area public schools.

Beltway jerks harass uniformed military personnel Update: Bob Owens vets the memo

May 21, 2008 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

They don’t support our troops.

Michael Moore vs. Michael Yon

May 20, 2008 07:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

46 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

War.

The return of an unhinged IVAW member

April 1, 2008 07:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Er, um, well, uh, oh, hell, no

March 27, 2008 12:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

A proper welcome for the Vets for Freedom in the Twin Cities

March 25, 2008 04:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

16 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Counterinsurgency alert!

All they are saying is give Mercedes Benz a chance

March 25, 2008 12:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

43 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

D’oh-d’ohs in the Bay Area.


Categories: They don't support the troops


Little Miss Attila

» That New McCain Ad

JustOneMinute

» Seeing Is Not Believing

JustOneMinute

» Sweetheart Deal