See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Open Thread: Michelle hosts The Factor
2. Flush the Koran, do not pass go, go straight to jail? « Volunteer Opinion Journal
3. Dumb Ox Daily News

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:24 pm, The Raging Republican said:

   Welcome to ‘The Malkin Factor’. Liberals, run and hide….. she is fierce!

2. #2
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, Bad Candy said:

   That’s okay Michelle, your guest host days are usually good relief from the tabloid stuff. Its very refreshing. Plus you’ll be covering Beauchamp, which needs to be mainstreamed.

3. #3
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pm, Schweggie said:

   LOL, Michelle. You should hold your middle knuckle out as a sign that you are doing the segment against your will during the Lohan bit… like that CLASSIC photo of the serviceman posing with Hillary holding his knuckle out…that would be sweet. Heh.

4. #4
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, gayle said:

   Please ask the question;

   “When are our borders going to be secured; time/date?”

   Don’t take a vague response or the stall tactic as an answer PLEASE!

   None of that …well, in about 6 months we’ll start…….

   Cannot wait to watch!

5. #5
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:36 pm, josetheguerilla said:

   Wow! Sounds like a good show. I’ll toon in. Bill who?

6. #6
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Nothing on the Koreans, but we get a Lindsey Lohan segment? I know you don’t control all the content, but that is sad.

   Otherwise, looks like another good one.

7. #7
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, taylork said:

   why doesn’t anyone seem to care about Lindsey Lohan and her little outfits?!?!

8. #8
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, 24Klady said:

   I’ll be watching. Any gossip or rumors out there whether Judicial Watch would consider this worthy of their involvement to help or advise with the appeal by the City of Hazleton? They are the only ones I can see with the clout to help them out.

9. #9
   On July 27th, 2007 at 3:47 pm, Laree said:

   Lindsay Lohan why? I mean it has been covered more then it warrants already. Monica Crowley made this her entire blog for the last couple of days. I never can figure out why, when it is news with any substance, the subject is reduced to the crawl and the tabloid is up top. It would be great to see it flipped just once.

   Imus is supposed to be close to a settlement with Moonves but Moonves wants to match any offer- the story today, in the New York Post. That is like entertainment news. I want to know where Imus is going to land, some say he is putting feelers out to Clear Channel, and others, I hope he simulcast again. Imus wants back on the air. I think the sooner the better.

   I will be watching, you are mine and my in-laws favorite, unfortunately my husband thinks Anne Coulter, is the Bomb. He just isn’t right about Anne Coulter.

10. #10
    On July 27th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, MikeB said:

    Why nothing on Alberto Gonzalez? Our top law enforcement officer repeatedly lying to Congress. Oh, wait Lindsay is more important. Who are your guests Paris Hilton and Nichole Richie?

11. #11
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, Schweggie said:

    On July 27th, 2007 at 3:58 pm, huhwhat said:

    I think I have figured out who MIKEB is; it is Jim Carey bent over smarmily talking out of his a$$.

    There we go, had to add the bolded text.

12. #12
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:10 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I can’t wait to hear what J.D. has to say about Pvt Joker.

13. #13
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, George said:

    Michelle:

    Are you going to get your own show on FNS?
    Boot Geraldo. Perfect spot for your show:

    “Hot Air Weekend with Michelle Malkin”

14. #14
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:16 pm, zorro said:

    I’ll be there, steaks on the grill, bottle of Valpolicella…

    My favorite 8 o’clock hour of the summer week!

15. #15
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, Boomer said:

    Something good to watch tonight after all, I love to watch Michelle hand Liberals their butts. Great to watch the facts of an issue trump feelings behind their fragile point of view.

16. #16
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, 24Klady said:

    We have to send some compliments or kudos to Fox C/O O’Reilly to let them know how much we enjoy MM filling in for O’Reilly. That said, we also have to be careful not to go so overboard that he feels threatened - the man’s ego surpasses the circumference of the planet. Let him think that MM is his protege. At least he had the foresight to see MM’s talent and wisdom and how it would enhance his shows. Look forward to every show.

    Funny, most men I’ve talked to think that MM is the bomb - and feel totally threatened by, or seriously dislike, Coulter. I adore Coulter, in small doses, but wish she’d tamp it down just a tad.

17. #17
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:24 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Hey did anyone see this story from Breibart.com?

    Liberal activists are stepping up their campaign against Fox News Channel by pressuring advertisers not to patronize the network.
    MoveOn.org, the Campaign for America’s Future and liberal blogs like DailyKos.com are asking thousands of supporters to monitor who is advertising on the network. Once a database is gathered, an organized phone-calling campaign will begin, said Jim Gilliam, vice president of media strategy for Brave New Films, a company that has made anti-Fox videos.

    The groups have successfully pressured Democratic presidential candidates not to appear at any debate sponsored by Fox, and are also trying to get Home Depot Inc. to stop advertising there.

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QL52780&show_article=1

    I think we need to keep track of advertisers, too, and let them know we support their businesses and sponsorship of Fox News.

18. #18
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Yes, there will be a Lindsay Lohan segment. Don’t blame me. You can always use it to take a bathroom break.

    Don’t forget the paper shredder!

    Umm, MikeB, can you not read. Loha_ is out of her control. When you get as good as Michelle, maybe Bill O’ will give you time and you can do your MM hate speech and you AG story then.

    Bwaaahhaaa, I crack myself up. MikeB getting some air time on Bill O’ and the ratings go down to below Olb-dork with his 12 viewers.

    Knock ‘em dead Michelle. Great way to start a weekend!

19. #19
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, see-dubya said:

    “So, Lindsey Lohan’s publicist, what do you think about the Korean missionaries threatened with execution by the Taliban?”

    I dare you!

20. #20
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    #19, I agree…I show support by purchasing their products or services . However, I seriously doubt advertisers who are interested in profits will listen to DKos or their ilk. FOX reaches too many people, even the people who watch it because they hate it.

21. #21
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, Regulus said:

    My nightly schedule is for once going to permit me to see “The Malkin Factor!” And it’s Friday! A Two-Fer: Woo-hoo!

22. #22
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:37 pm, JConrad999 said:

    When is Michelle getting her own show?

23. #23
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:46 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Michelle: It would be interesting to have you do a review of the various experiments being proposed or enacted at State and local levels to control illegal immigration. Forget the fence for a moment, Hazelton, PA. Loudoun, VA, Prince William, VA, and Arizona and possible others are trying different approaches to curtailing illegal immigration. This could be contrast with the idiotic New Haven, CT activity.

24. #24
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, MikeB said:

    Just remember this, Fox’s owner, Mr. Murdoch is a huge Hillary contributor.

25. #25
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:51 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    By the way, I agree that the constant sensational celebrity coverage of Lohan, Hilton, and some of these other meaningless bimbettes is distracting, - and it reflects a real laziness on the part of the news media. The O’Reilly Factor is getting distracted from real issues by a bunch of silliness, and I watch the Factor for real news analysis. Time to tighten the ship.

26. #26
    On July 27th, 2007 at 4:59 pm, Bad Candy said:

    Michelle, you should talk about Ace’s informant getting canned. I think its a valid question, and the media is embargoing that part of the story. He just posted about it, you should check it out.

27. #27
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:00 pm, jeffshultz said:

    You definitely need to stick the Korean hostage crisis in there somewhere…

28. #28
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, bear1909 said:

    Re FOX advertisers….the only problem Kos and Company will have with their campaign is that Home Depot advertises to a “spend market”…PERIOD. What is KOS offering Home Depot? A free subscription? Bring it on. Money talks and KOS lives in a dream world.

29. #29
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, Capt Howdy said:

    MikeB -

    Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, is a huge Hillary Clinton contributor?!

    Wow!

    I read somewhere that Rupert Murdoch is also very chummy with Communist China… do you know if this is true?

30. #30
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:12 pm, MikeB said:

    Capt read it and weep:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/07/16/hillary-clinton-shuns-fox_n_56495.html

31. #31
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:16 pm, MikeB said:

    Why aren’t you conservatives calling for a boycott of Fox News? Does MM endorse Hillary too?

32. #32
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:29 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Again, I’m hearing circus music. Seems to be really pervasive today.

33. #33
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:31 pm, Artbyruth said:

    MM-

    Please try to mention the Korean hostages….

34. #34
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:34 pm, MikeB said:

    Click the link PBoiler–both Rupert and son gave to Hillary.

35. #35
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:36 pm, olblueyes said:

    I couldn’t care less who Murdoch gives money too. He could be the biggest liberal in the world but at least he’s got enough business sense to know that conservatives want an unbiased source of news and we aren’t going to get it anywhere else on television except Fox News. For that I am grateful. MikeB, your super-candidates, Hillary and Obama look more like hipocrites every day talking down about Fox News and yet embracing the man responsible for the very existence of the Fox News “right wing conspiracy”. In the end the Democrats care more about the money then their supposed “principle” of Fox’s biased…and that speaks volumes!

36. #36
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:37 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Yes, the Korean hostages need some media focus.

37. #37
    On July 27th, 2007 at 5:51 pm, dartagnans_blade said:

    While talking about the Iraq war please pose this question….Does the “patriotic” dissention amongst the dems bolster the jihadists and if so doesnt that mean that their so called “patriotic duty” to speak against the war ends up killing Americans and innocent Iraqis? In other words…If Murtha, Durbin, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, etc, etc….open thier mouths do our sons and daughters die? I say unequivocally YES

38. #38
    On July 27th, 2007 at 6:08 pm, Dersu said:

    MM,
    I am sure you have it all together, most of us are here to support ya.
    Give’um hell kid!

    ———————————–
    FEED THE TROLL AND WATCH HIM GROW

39. #39
    On July 27th, 2007 at 6:16 pm, ajmontana said:

    Ahhhhh, Friday night, Michelle Hosting Factor at 5:00 and a Game on at 6:00.
    Is America great or what?!!!

40. #40
    On July 27th, 2007 at 6:55 pm, ajmontana said:

    I sent Bill an e-mail regarding his latest web-site poll “none of the above” would be the only vote I would consider but that choice wasn’t available, so… I pulled an Obama (no vote)

41. #41
    On July 27th, 2007 at 6:56 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Blue:

    Murdoch and Hillary were made for each other politically.

    As liberal as we think she is, she’d actually be considered a conservative in England where the “conservatives” love the welfare state as much as liberals here.

    His giving to her campaign is understandable in that context.

42. #42
    On July 27th, 2007 at 7:45 pm, 24Klady said:

    #39 - Steaks are on, bottle breathing, veggies steaming. You’re so right, America on a Friday night is great.

43. #43
    On July 27th, 2007 at 8:31 pm, Crimsonfisted said:

    On July 27th, 2007 at 7:45 pm, 24Klady said:

    #39 - Steaks are on, bottle breathing, veggies steaming. You’re so right, America on a Friday night is great.

    oh wow. It is good to be alive when you talk like that. Sounds great, serve it up!

44. #44
    On July 27th, 2007 at 8:43 pm, mlog said:

    I watched the first half hour, but I don’t care to watch Whoopie Goldberg or Lindsey Lohan. Blech.

45. #45
    On July 27th, 2007 at 8:52 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Murdoch is first and foremost a businessman. Businesspeople cannot be ideologues. They have to be pragmatists. Giving to her campaign is smart because if she wins, and has her enemies list, he might be lower on the list.

    As for Michael Vick, I say let’s be patient and let the process work itself out.

    Off to a dinner party. I tivoed you Double-M!

    eric

46. #46
    On July 27th, 2007 at 8:53 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Oh, and I tivoed Hannity as well, so nobody spoil the ending.

    eric http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

47. #47
    On July 27th, 2007 at 9:03 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Colmes and Pirro talking about Vick.

    Yawn.

48. #48
    On July 27th, 2007 at 9:13 pm, olblueyes said:

    Concerning the Lohan segment, i’m kinda glad it was on but wish it was addressed a little differently. There is a cultural issue going on here that needs to be discussed more. when you have celebrities running around breaking laws and getting away with it. supposedly she was even ranting in the car to her three passengers how she can do whatever she wants and won’t get in trouble for it because she is a celebrity. and then blames the black kid. she sure knows how to work the system. i wish somebody would send a message to all these holier than though celebrities and send her ass to jail for a long time.

    i’m starting to get tired of hearing Bill repeat that there were no WMD’s in Iraq. There were WMDs, ask the Kurds, we just don’t know if Saddam gave them to somebody else before the invasion or if he disposed of them long ago. Either way it perpetuates the myth that our ousting of saddam was unjustified and it gives anti-war advocates too much wiggle room when they bash bush and the war.

    other than that, great show Michelle as always!

49. #49
    On July 27th, 2007 at 9:58 pm, 24Klady said:

    #43 - Oh my, unexpected company. Dinner was great, next time let us know when you’re going to be in town.

    Seriously, great show. Low key, points made…but for the fluff stuff (and I do not mean MM). Please, somebody explain to me (feel free to use big words) what Bill is about these days? He’s downright silly at times. The love fests with Whoopi, let alone, Rosie. Then, when they turn on him he’ll be so offended. Like so many, he’s forgotten who brought him to the dance.

50. #50
    On July 27th, 2007 at 10:05 pm, zorro said:

    Great show Michelle. You’re the best, no doubt.

    I dare say that you hosting the Friday Night Factor is even better than a Monday Night Football win for the Steelers. Thanks

51. #51
    On July 27th, 2007 at 10:11 pm, olblueyes said:

    I don’t know if anything is better than a steelers win…maybe a close second though… ; )

52. #52
    On July 27th, 2007 at 10:33 pm, gatewaypundit said:

    Nice job Michelle.
    Bill is lucky to have you to fill in.

53. #53
    On July 27th, 2007 at 10:38 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Awsome show MM. The wife says she likes the hair! Even with the Lohan stuff, it was a great show.

54. #54
    On July 27th, 2007 at 11:10 pm, ajmontana said:

    Good Show, but IMHO The NFL was taking this matter very serious before PETA and other groups started harrassing them. The NFL like them or not does a great job of policing within and is a fine organization.

55. #55
    On July 27th, 2007 at 11:25 pm, zorro said:

    On July 27th, 2007 at 10:11 pm, olblueyes said:
    I don’t know if anything is better than a steelers win…maybe a close second though… ; )

    Yes, but with Michelle, you know she never loses!

56. #56
    On July 27th, 2007 at 11:47 pm, bear1909 said:

    I don’t have cable.

    I spent my evening reading about how the City Planning Commisars of Berkeley California are going to move the auto dealers from auto row out to the west end of the city to make room for “dense fill” housing (code for taxpayer subsidized housing “units) for “blue collar workers who can’t afford to live in Berkeley but work in Berkeley.

    Nice vision. The replanted car dealerships will displace a business that has been in the City forever and is ranked in the top 8 sales taxpayers in the area. This is “smart development” to fight “global warming” and it is coming to your city.

    Would love to see a “Factor” show on this trendy taxpayer swindling scam headed up by none other than Albert Gore and the Global Warming Snake Oil Dealers of America.

    OT: I like the Steelers when they arent playing the Niners or the Raiders. Back in the day I visited the Fair City every Thanksgiving and drank Iron City Beer until my marbles had rolled onto the flat side. There was a park near Shadyside where we’d go and roll down the grassy knoll to see who didn’t toss cookies by the time we hit bottom. The winner had to chug some “Crybaby Red”.

    Lucky for me the only bar i ever see these days has got lettuce and tomato.

    Image: Bear gettin under an Iron City Tall Boy before admitting to the adoring crowd he is a die-hard Jack Tatum fan.

57. #57
    On July 28th, 2007 at 7:29 am, trainwife1962 said:

    Why doesn’t Michelle have her own show? I only watch “The Factor” when she guest hosts.

58. #58
    On July 28th, 2007 at 8:18 am, TheCityTroll said:

    Related to Fox News have you all seen this campaign to threaten it’s advertisers….

    http://thecitytroll.blogspot.com/2007/07/bolsheviks-on-move.html

59. #59
    On July 28th, 2007 at 9:50 am, dartagnans_blade said:

    What a bunch of pathetic suckups.I feel ilke I am in “The View” audience

    “Related to Fox News have you all seen this campaign to threaten it’s advertisers….”
    Yeah, pretty unbelieveable stuff…hopefully a “strong” conservative somewhere will urge all Americans to punish companies that punish fox….don’t hold your breath though..I have yet to find a strong conservative willing to do anything.

60. #60
    On July 28th, 2007 at 9:53 am, JohntheChristian said:

    Oh, I’m sad I missed it.

    Does anyone think that Perhaps Michelle is being groomed for her own show?

    That would be AWESOME!!!!

61. #61
    On July 28th, 2007 at 10:08 am, almeehan said:

    I don’t know about other parts of the country, but in east TN they rebroadcast all the Fox segments. I had to work during the 8pm segment but got to watch the 11pm with coffee in hand, feet propped up and enjoying MM smiling and deftly handling the show. Her hair was very nice tonight and her smile charming as ever. What a way to unwind from a long hard day fighting crime.

62. #62
    On July 28th, 2007 at 10:34 am, Laree said:

    The only time I have ever agreed with PETA. I am a dog lover and I think we only got to see the tip of the iceburg where these dogs treatment is concerned, they probably couldn’t show the worse on TV.

    Al Sharpton, insisted that Imus loose his whole way of making a living, radio and tv show. For saying Nappy Headed Ho, in the context of a joke, trying to parody hip hop…but Vick is going to loose his sponsors or they are suspending his endorsements, and I am supposed to feel sorry for him? He is going to get paid all this year for not playing football. Nice work if you can get it.

    Imus didn’t even get investigated by the FCC, he broke no rules or laws in fact his contract with CBS encouraged him to be controversial and edgy. People say it isn’t fair to compare these two different issues. I say it points out the MSM double standards regarding treatment of people based on ethnicity. Vick is presumed innocent, until or otherwise found guilty. Imus got lynched.

63. #63
    On July 28th, 2007 at 10:37 am, ajmontana said:

    Dart said,
    “What a bunch of pathetic suckups.I feel ilke I am in “The View” audience”

    Knowing what a ‘The View’ audience is like….. way more pathetic.

64. #64
    On July 28th, 2007 at 10:57 am, Laree said:

    63#

    This person can’t figure out that if we watch Michelle, on tv we might also patronize her blog?

    The View, I don’t ever watch The View this person seems to be an expert on the View.

65. #65
    On July 28th, 2007 at 1:26 pm, bear1909 said:

    Bolsheviks-on-the-move. Hmmm. Pretty brazen mindset. Who’d want to associate with that *LOST* cause? I wonder if they are getting funding from the Russian mobster Vladimir “I Can See it In My Eyes” Putin?

    They should be crushed. Dissent is one thing. Overthrowing the US government is another. Not that I am a big government fan: I just wonder a) who would die first; and, b) who would control military arsenals and chemical stocks.

    Image: Bear1909 wearing goggles, fins and snorkel diving deeper into the matter. “Then I’m gonna eat up all your chocolates, anda grin right in your face.” -J. Hendrix

66. #66
    On July 28th, 2007 at 3:50 pm, CC said:

    Enjoyed watching you last night as always, Michelle. I know you dreaded doing the Lohan piece, and it would have been okay for you to say “some of YOU do” in response to the other person saying “we love it”. No, we don’t.

    I email everyone on Fox every time one of these silly twits gets themselves a headline, pleading with them not to hammer the non-story, every few minutes for the next week. They even have a panel about it. People can go to one of the entertainment programs or sites if they are interested in these idiots and their vacant lives.

67. #67
    On July 28th, 2007 at 4:55 pm, Bill DeFelice said:

    I always enjoy a pleasant change in any routeen broadcast.You must twirl a penn,like O’Reiley does.

68. #68
    On July 28th, 2007 at 5:31 pm, Laree said:

    All,

    Have a look at this they are planning on giving the new Fox Channel- FNC the Imus treatment. I have already commented on this, it is disturbing but not unexpected.

    http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/07/28/moveonorg-vs-fnc/

69. #69
    On July 28th, 2007 at 6:59 pm, nbarry said:

    The Fox people are crying all the way to the bank.

70. #70
    On July 28th, 2007 at 7:15 pm, bear1909 said:

    Whether or not eyeballs like or dislike what is happening on FNC, the meter counts just one thing: number of pairs of eyes viewing FNC.

    CHA_CHING!!!!

71. #71
    On July 29th, 2007 at 8:28 am, Laree said:

    Move on. org is planning a secondary boycott of the new FBC channel as I stated above, you can go to the article. They will use a media monitoring organization to do this, huh I wonder which one …not really I am being sarcastic. At which time they intend to collect information on all the advertizers and start a blitz campaign against this new channel’s sponsors. (A Secondary Boycott) Move on, wants to strangle FBC in it’s infancy, now you don’t think it will work or happen but this is what happened to Don Imus and they used it once before and they are planning on using it again. Media Matters was monitoring Don Imus for 2 years to catch a soundbite, they could use to get him off the air. Then they threatened the networks and when that looked like it might not be enough, they threatened the Network’s sponsors. The secondary boycott. Right now Move on, has Home Depot and Lowes, in their sights. I will stop buying from these two companys, if they cave in to this extortion.

    http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20070423.html

72. #72
    On July 29th, 2007 at 12:53 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    This is very interesting also:

    Fox Basher Claim: ‘I Posted’ Clinton Death Threat on BillOReilly.com!

73. #73
    On July 29th, 2007 at 4:16 pm, Laree said:

    I cannot consider Move on a Democrat- Liberal organization, they are anti Free Speech, this is Socialist behavior not American. What is Hillary Clinton’s position on Move on. I remember when Hillary Clinton’s book “Living History” was going to be distributed in China and the Chineses tried to edit what they didn’t like out of her book. Hillary insisted her Book be pulled, then to let any part of it be censored. I would like to know all of the Canidates for President of USA for 2008 position on FREE SPEECH. Have any of them been asked about this issue at all?

74. #74
    On July 30th, 2007 at 9:27 am, gregorystephens said:

    I seriously need to get cable again. I keep missing out on all of these opportunities to see you, Michelle. Although, the Ruby Tuesday I go to usually has Fox News on and I’ve caught the show there a few times. It’s just not the same when you have to read the closed captiions. Keep up the great work.