About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

South Korean Christian hostage update: Negotiations continue

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 28, 2007 11:01 AM

koreans2.jpg

The latest:

Two lawmakers—one of them a former Taliban member—and several influential elders have joined negotiations with the hardline militia to step up pressure for the release of 22 South Korean hostages, an official said Saturday.

A South Korean presidential envoy, Baek Jong-chun, was scheduled to hold talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Saturday, an official from the South Korean Embassy in Kabul said. She spoke on condition of anonymity because of embassy policy.

The Taliban has demanded the release of insurgent prisoners in exchange for the South Koreans, who were captured on July 19. One of the original 23 captives was shot to death on Wednesday.

A former Taliban commander—Abdul Salaam Rocketi, now a member of parliament—has joined the talks, said Shirin Mangal, spokesman of the Ghazni provincial governor. A second lawmaker and several respected leaders from around Qarabagh, the area in Ghazni province where the hostages were taken, have also joined, he said.

“Today we are hopeful to get a good result because more and more elders have gathered from Ghazni,” said Qarabagh police chief Khwaja Mohammad. “I hope the Taliban will listen to these negotiations now because they are neutral people—elders from around Qarabagh district.”

Yonhap:

A special South Korean presidential envoy met with Afghan officials in Kabul on Saturday on a mission to secure the release of 22 South Koreans seized by Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan 10 days ago, South Korean officials in Seoul said.

Baek Jong-chun, national security adviser to President Roh Moo-hyun, arrived in the Afghan capital on Friday as negotiations to free the hostages dragged on. South Korean officials said the envoy was seeking a meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

“Though no schedule has been set, we expect Baek to meet the Afghan president today,” an official in Seoul said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

South Korean government sources say Baek is expected to ask the Afghan president to be flexible on the demands by the kidnappers and to convey Roh’s request to make the release of the hostages a top priority.

“Sending a presidential special envoy is the best possible choice the president can make at this point,” South Korean presidential spokesman Chun Ho-seon told reporters on Friday.

Meanwhile, South Korea mourns the slain pastor:

South Korea is mourning the death of Bae Hyung-kyu, a devout Christian pastor who led the group of 22 church volunteers currently being held hostage by Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan.

Family members held a memorial service in Jeju, south of the South Korean capital Seoul, days after Bae’s body was found on Wednesday with 10 bullet holes in the head, chest and stomach. Bae turned 42 that day and is survived by a wife and 9-year-old daughter.

Kim Hee-yeon, widow of the slain South Korean pastor, said at a news conference on Friday that she explained to her daughter that Dad received a huge gift from God on his birthday and returned to heaven.

A pastor for about six years, Bae was one of the founders of the 5,000-membered Saemmul Church in Bundang, just south of Seoul, and was the oldest of the group sent by the church to Afghanistan. He led services for younger members of the congregation, the vast majority of whom are under 40.

“Our pastor who was killed was a very good Christian and a very peaceful person,” said Park Eun-jo, senior pastor at Saemmul Church.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bill's Bites
  2. Gubatron
  3. Four Pointer

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On July 28th, 2007 at 11:15 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    Sending a presidential envoy?? Hey, Roh Moo-hyun, how about sending soldiers! That is the only thing the Taliban understand.

  2. #2
    On July 28th, 2007 at 11:49 am, Pat said:

    The bastards killed him just so they could up the ante for the inevitable payoff from South Korea.

  3. #3
    On July 28th, 2007 at 12:02 pm, ajmontana said:

    “Mourning, watching, waiting, praying.”
    You’re caption sums it up.

    Adding, These cold blooded, ignorant, cowardly killers must be caught.

  4. #4
    On July 28th, 2007 at 12:18 pm, changjin89 said:

    Saturday morning greetings Mrs. Malkin and loyal community. Many thanks to you for your dogged attention to the continuing plight of the kidnapped Korean missionaries. With respect to the mission of envoy Baek, it seems that on the surface he would have little influence with President Karzai in meeting the demands of the kidnappers; Korea’s military contingent of 150 engineers and 60 medical personnel is already scheduled to leave by the end of the year. However, if the policy of the Roh Moo-hyun Administration towards the Kim family regime that holds northern Korea in its thrall is a guide, then perhaps envoy Baek will offer ransom to the kidnappers. If the Roh Administration wants to get President Karzai to release Taliban prisoners, perhaps money also will be offered to the Afghan government. To date there is nothing in the track record of the Roh Administration that would suggest that the Taliban bandits will suffer military consequences at the hands of the Korean armed forces for their capital misdeeds.

  5. #5
    On July 28th, 2007 at 12:22 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Then need to send the ROK Marines in there to slice’em and dice’em! Don’t submit to those bastards!!!!!!!!

  6. #6
    On July 28th, 2007 at 12:49 pm, puhiawa said:

    These young men and women were on a charitable medical mission. The evil of Islam is limitless.

  7. #7
    On July 28th, 2007 at 1:15 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    #4 is correct. The Korean military contingent in Afghanistan was never intended to put warheads on foreheads. Why would they start fighting now?

    It sounds like the Taliban animals will get their way.

  8. #8
    On July 28th, 2007 at 1:27 pm, dedalus said:

    …another reason (as though one were needed) why we should have sealed off and annihilated the Taliban and Queda holdouts in Tora Bora.

  9. #9
    On July 28th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    On July 28th, 2007 at 1:27 pm, dedalus said:
    …another reason (as though one were needed) why we should have sealed off and annihilated the Taliban and Queda holdouts in Tora Bora.

    It’s very important to remember something (taken from members of the 1st Battalion, 258th Field Artillery Regiment Nat Guard in Jamaica Queens — who really feel for the circumstances of women over there ) that there is _nothing_ the grunts on the ground would love better than “just surround and annilate” enemy combatants. What looks like a common sense “quick n’ easy wrap up” move to the media and other parties is routinely considered weeks before by the guys on the ground. If they’re unable to effect such a seemingly simple operation it’s not because the idea never occurred to them or they weren’t motivated but local and political factors hamstring such a response. You’re trying to wage a “humanitarian war” campaign with minimal civilian casualties uppermost in your mind, one, and two, you must regard the religious and tribal sensitivities of the locals to keep them on your side, with all the pitfalls inherent there. It’s the damnedest of battles because your objective is not to reduce a countryside into a parking lot. The enemy knows this well and exploits it to the hilt. We couldn’t have won WWII that way. That said, ironically South Korea has the advantage, due their low profile and numbers in Afghanistan, of being able to effect a one shot dead-drop strike on the Taliban as daring as the Entebbe Raid with minimal retaliation consequences over there. I don’t think they’d receive much condemnation for violently taking out a few Taliban strongholds and doing a few nasty covert things to teach the Taliban a lesson. I vaguely recall — someone help me here — in the ’70’s when a Russian envoy or diplomat or such was kidnapped and murdered by Iranians and after the KGB kidnapped one of their leaders and sent him back home in pieces in a gift box the kidnappings stopped. You sadly have to be that brutal dealing with people who don’t share your mode of thinking.

    James Greenidge
    Queens New York

  10. #10
    On July 28th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, changjin89 said:

    John Masters (1914 – 1983) wrote a book “Bugles and a Tiger”, set mostly in Waziristan near the Afghan eastern border in the 1930s while he was an officer of the 4th Gurkha Rifles. In it (pp 188 – 190) he gave several examples of the uncanny, indeed brutal methods of one fellow Indian Army officer in fighting Waziri tribesmen, a good many of whom with some of their fellow Pathans in Afghanistan today comprise the manpower of the Taliban. In reflection, Masters decided that these incidents “made it clear why the major was so brilliantly successful in his tactics. Under his skin he was a Pathan. His instincts made him do, in any circumstances, just what a Pathan would do.”

    In playing an important role in the recapture of Seoul from the Inmingun in September 1950, the ROK Marine Corps were famously not gentle. In their duties in Vietnam in the late 1960s and early 1970s, they inspired the North Vietnam Army formations in their area of operations to avoid contact with them whenever possible. Even today, they maintain a training camp near Pohang that is famously resorted to by employers seeking to motivate staff and parents seeking to give new perspective to adolescent children. The ROK Marine Corps would like to acquire their own aviation assets but in fact are facing severe reductions in force according to plans drawn up by the Roh Moo-hyun Administration.

    Obviously, if the ROK Marine Corps could rescue safely Korean citizens and severely chastise their captors, the place of the Corps in the hearts of their countrymen could be set for the next one hundred years. While it is hopeful to imagine that the last week has been used to bring in various appropriate assets of the ROK armed forces and get them quietly into place to allow such a strike, given the mentality of the Roh Administration that remains in power for the rest of this year, such a bold scenario seems very unlikely.

  11. #11
    On July 28th, 2007 at 11:11 pm, Perk said:

    It is terribble, very sad that these ‘missionaries’ were taken and are being held. It also should be recognized that they were told not to visit, that the Afghani govt would not take responsibility for them or protect them, and they entered Afghanistan without permission. Hopefully there will be a time when missionaries can enter the country without issues, but now is obviously not the time.
    We are expending enourmous resources on these people, when there may be other priorities, because they placed themselves in harms way.
    I want them saved. I am sympathetic to their cause, even though I am familiar with Korean ‘Christian’ evangelistic churches (very different from what we in the west expect, or understand as Christian). I do not however, believe that we can ignore the fact that they were warned not to go. That they then snuck into the country, and that kidnapping is an accepted way of making money for groups in that area.
    It is amazing how the MSM is ignoring the issue, but when it is exposed, all the facts should be extant.

  12. #12
    On July 29th, 2007 at 1:57 am, NeoConNews said:

    I can’t add much to all the thought and expertise poured into the comments above, beyond praying for the lives of those held hostage, and hope that those who have taken them will get what they deserve soon.

  13. #13
    On July 29th, 2007 at 6:09 pm, Laree said:

    #10 Not to mention that going into caves during the Korean War, give them the ROK some experience, with the terrain and that kind of warfare. I too would hope “they” would be quietly inserted, they fight on their own terms, there is a lesson for us. I don’t need to know they are there. The answer isn’t appeasement, you can’t appease people who want you dead.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

South Korean Christian hostage crisis: 4 more freed Update: All released

August 30, 2007 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Release…and submission.

Report: The South Korean Christian hostages to be freed

August 28, 2007 08:52 AM by Michelle Malkin

46 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Cutting a deal with Taliban.

Deadlock on Day 35: The South Korean Christian hostage crisis

August 23, 2007 10:46 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Have you forgotten?

Breaking: Two South Korean Christian hostages freed

August 13, 2007 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

17 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

“Gesture of good will.” More: The released hostages are Kim Gina, 32, and Kim Kyung-ja, 37, ministry spokesman Cho Hee-yong told reporters.

South Korean Christian hostage crisis: Day 24

August 12, 2007 06:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

13 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

South Korean Christian hostage crisis, Day 21: “The Taliban could not be reached immediately for comment.”

August 9, 2007 08:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

The latest on the South Korean Christian hostage crisis: Karzai appeals to terrorists’ sense of shame. Something tells me this ain’t gonna work.

The forgotten South Korean Christian hostages

August 4, 2007 05:27 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

South Korean Christian hostage crisis: America-bashers exploit the ordeal

August 2, 2007 09:30 AM by Michelle Malkin

34 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

More waiting, watching, and pussyfooting around.


Categories: South Korean Christian hostages