What the hell happened in the House last night?

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 3, 2007 10:15 AM

Remember?

“This leadership team will create the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history” – Speaker-Elect Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Release, November 16, 2006

And now, watch via Rep. Eric Cantor:

The backstory via Politico:

In a massive flare-up of partisan tension, Republicans walked out on a House vote late Thursday night to protest what they believed to be Democratic maneuvers to reverse an unfavorable outcome for the majority party. The flap represents a complete breakdown in parliamentary procedure and an unprecedented low for the historically divided chamber. The rancor erupted shortly before 11 p.m. as Rep. Michael R. McNulty (D-N.Y.) gaveled close the vote on a standard procedural measure with the outcome still in doubt. Details remain fuzzy, but numerous Republicans argued afterward that they had secured a 215-213 win on their motion to bar undocumented immigrants from receiving any federal funds apportioned in the agricultural spending bill for employment or rental assistance. Democrats, however, argued that the measure was deadlocked at 214-214 and failed, members and aides on both sides of the aisle said afterward.

One GOP aide saw McNulty gavel the vote to a close after receiving a signal from his leaders – but before reading the official tally. And votes continued to shift even after he closed the vote – a strange development in itself. Whatever the final tally, acrimony quickly exploded between lawmakers on either side of the aisle as Democratic leaders tried to plot a solution while parliamentarians on either side argued over protocol. Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) eventually offered a motion to reconsider, according to floor staff on either side, ostensibly giving members a chance to recast their votes.

But the maneuver sparked a chorus of angry protests from the Republican side of the chamber, with members yelling “Shame” at the party in power, while Democrats returned fire with angry volleys of their own. When Democrats finally moved to consider the spending bill as the last vote of the night, Republicans left the chamber en masse to protest the maneuver, furious with what had transpired. The House eventually recessed at 11:18, but Republicans quickly discovered that there was no longer any record of the controversial vote and immediately charged Democrats with erasing the bad result. “Obviously, the Democrats don’t want to stand up against illegal immigration – so much so that they’re willing to cheat in order to win a vote,” Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) said in an e-mail. “They’re desperate – and it shows.”

Allah tries to sort through the procedural mess. Kathryn Lopez: “That’s the last time I fall asleep early.”

Way to clean house, Nancy. Heckuva job!

***

FWIW, here’s the NRCC’s take:

In clear violation of yet another campaign promise, Democrats manuevered last night to forcibly reverse the outcome of a vote that would have barred illegal immigrants from receiving taxpayer-funded benefits. After a majority of the House initially passed the measure barring illegal immigrants from receiving taxpayer funded handouts, Democrat leaders stepped-in to strong-arm their politically vulnerable members into switching their votes in order to defeat the measure and deliver benefits for illegals.

Unfortunately for those Democrats who switched their votes, their actions were caught on tape. Hoping that nobody was watching them in the dead of night, Democrats Nick Lampson (TX), Harry Mitchell (AZ), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), and Zack Space (OH) were all caught getting their arms twisted by their leadership and voting against the measure after initially supporting it…With the Democrat-led Congress’ approval ratings sagging to all-time lows, it is no wonder why the American people have grown so tired of business as usual in Washington. On an issue as simple as keeping taxpayer benefits from going to illegal immigrants, Democrats refuse to put partisanship aside. When will they finally start getting the people’s work done?

Posted in: Corruption, Democrats

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sister Toldjah » House erupts in controversy, Republicans walk out in outrage
  2. Stuck On Stupid
  3. Webloggin - Blog Archive » New Low For Pelosi Leadership, Breakdown in House
  4. Bill's Bites
  5. Parliamentay procedure be damned! The Dems want a do over. « Volunteer Opinion Journal
  6. ScottMeg.com » Wow…shady
  7. Hennessy's View
  8. Gubatron
  9. Area Fifty-J » Silly Dems…
  10. A Republic No More | Hennessy's View
  11. Nice Deb So What Has The Most Honest And Ethical Congress In History Been Up To Lately? «
  12. Hayworth exoneration hidden away « Seeing Red AZ

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #2
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:38 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    After reading this story on Politico, the part I find AMAZING is how the records of this vote have disappeared – or never were established.

    Keep it up, Nancy – as a conservative voter, I grow more and more confident for 2008 with every move the majority makes.

  2. #3
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:40 am, taylork said:

    Too bad the MSM will never cover this.

  3. #4
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:44 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Yep, jrlingreenbay. They really are a spectacular failure.

    By the way…is your name a nod to Green Bay, Wisconsin?

    I always like to find fellow conservatives in the Dairy State. Seeing as it seems we’re as rare here as low-fat cheese. :-)

  4. #5
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:45 am, swj719AWG said:

    Twice I send a link, twice it becomes a post. woohoo!

    Though odds are REALLY good it was being done already.

    Don’t remind me of that. Allow me my joy. :)

  5. #6
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:46 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Too bad the MSM will never cover this.

    Yes they will, taylor. And it’ll all be the Republicans’ and Bush’s fault.

  6. #7
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:48 am, Foz said:

    They can’t win if we don’t let them cheat.

  7. #8
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:48 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    Yes, Englishqueen – I’m in Titletown. Actually, I live in the Appleton area – but I work here in Green Bay.

  8. #9
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:52 am, wildbillk said:

    For all of those voters who sat out the last election: This is what you get. Maybe next time you’ll think twice about skiping an election.

  9. #10
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:54 am, Yashmak said:

    The commentary at Politico is unbelieveable to me. It’s a travesty that this occurred, but all the liberal voices there have to say is “enjoy the minority”.

    That it’s a blatant, and gross violation, doesn’t even occur to them. That it was done (apparently) to overturn a done-deal vote on an issue for which polls show the majority of American citizens would have favored the original outcome is scandalous.

  10. #11
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:54 am, Brian72 said:

    I didn’t know that could be done in the House. Shamnesty continues, just away from the phone and fax lines this time.

    This Congress I hearby name the Chavista Congress of ‘07. Fairness Doctrine and whatever else they can get away with. What’s next, nationalizing health care? Big Oil swallowed by Big Government?

    I don’t want to hear anymore bashing the Iraqi parliament. These guys have no room to criticize anyone, anywhere. Nobody is shooting at them.

    They don’t mind cheating, as long as it is their side that benefits. Erasing the vote record is something that I’ve never thought could be done. I guess you learn something every day.

  11. #12
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:55 am, swj719AWG said:

    On August 3rd, 2007 at 10:48 am, Foz said:
    They can’t win if we don’t let them cheat.

    You just made my rotating sig-file…

  12. #13
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:00 am, Brian72 said:

    Come to think of it, they tried to erase the record in 2000. The record of votes by troops overseas, because they lost. Never got over it, either.

    Lesson: Never be suprised by big government liberals.

  13. #14
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:04 am, Brian72 said:

    Ed at Captain’s Quarters:

    The rules exist for a reason — to make sure that the House functions regardless of the rancor between its members. Once a vote has been gaveled closed, it becomes part of the record and should become official. Votes should not be changed after that point, nor should the entire record of the vote get expunged.

    Democrats won the last election and have the responsibility to run the House according to the parliamentary rules established long beforehand. Even beyond that, they should feel some responsibility to act like adults. Removing a vote from the record after it has been taken should remind us of Josef Stalin and his attempts to rewrite history. Their actions undermine the very concept of democracy and parliamentary procedure.

    Even the party in charge has to be bound by the rules. Democrats like to blather at length about how George Bush abuses his power and attacks freedom and liberty. This episode shows who the real totalitarians are.

    They don’t like being called Stalinists. Guess the truth hurts, huh?

  14. #15
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:08 am, katieanne said:

    Ethics, Nancy style. They can’t win if they don’t cheat.

  15. #16
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:17 am, Godzilla said:

    lol liberals.

    In Democratic Party, vote choose you!

  16. #17
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:24 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    From “The Capitolist” website, an anonymous forum for Hill Staffers:

    Staffer 1: “The Democrats are going to regret that. It was late, the day before recess, and they just got sloppy. This will be perfect for GOP talking points.”

    Staffer 2: “yeah, cause Main Street cares about the rules of the House….
    …Keep telling yourself that, though. It will make you feel better.” ( Some comments deleted due to profanity )

    This is the liberal mentality – they THINK that Main Street America doesn’t care about these flagrant violations of rule and decorum and ethics.

    They think that, because the GOP has, in the past, done their own trampling of the minority – that it’s payback time.

    The problem with that thinking is that, even though they won in 2006, they ran on ELIMINATING this type of politics. They ran saying they’d create an ethical congress, and do away with the Politics as usual. They ran saying they would do the people’s business, not mire down in endless investigations.

    Lies – lies – lies. But they think the American people are too stupid to see what’s really going on with the Democratic leadership.

    “Oh, look, they raised the minimum wage! What? They erased evidence of a vote they were losing? Ahh…who cares.”

    We’re not blind, stupid or forgetful.

    That is the strength of conservatives. We remember – and we wait.

  17. #18
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:25 am, George said:
  18. #19
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:27 am, swj719AWG said:

    Dear Speaker Pelosi,

    Ethics are just something that happens to other people, aren’t they.

  19. #20
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:28 am, englishqueen01 said:

    I’m in Milwaukee, jrlingreenbay…next to Madistan, we’re the most liberal part of the state. The only thing keeping Milwaukee Co. sane is its supervisor – Scott Walker. A good man.

    I’m not very savvy on all the rules of the House, but it’s clear the Democrats are worse than a do-nothing Congress. They’re a corrupt, cheating, unethical Congress.

    Americans need to know about this because, with the exception of the moonbats and lefties, most won’t stand for this.

    It’s childish behavior. My five-month-old son has a better grasp of levity and decent behavior than Pelosi & Co.

  20. #22
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:29 am, xler8bmw said:

    I thought Nancy was going to clean up the congressional swamp not, make it larger!

    Good job Dems! Keep this up and we can have our Republicans back sooner than we thought PLEASE!

  21. #23
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:31 am, Romeo13 said:

    Pelosi “Most ethical Congress EVAH!!!”

    /channels Montoya “you keepa usin dat word…”

    LOL… I don’t even have to finish it do I?

  22. #24
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:32 am, Just A Grunt said:

    Republican house members are addressing the media now. They have talked about a bunch of bills that have already been passed which included goverment aid to illegal aliens. This latest bill was a Agriculture bill which included food stamps for illegal aliens.
    The Dems have placed so many benefits for illegals in other bills that have already passed that it is no wonder our damn budget is out of control.
    The Republicans need to keep hitting this point and get it into the antique media. When Americans find out how much the Dems have handed to the illegal population congress is going to think that little dust up over the amnesty bill was a pillow fight.

  23. #25
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:35 am, Brian72 said:

    This is the header and first paragraph from The American Thinker:

    August 03, 2007
    House Dems Dirty Tricks Force Republican Walkout
    Marc Sheppard
    In what just might be the dirtiest trick ever played in the House of Representatives, last night Democrats tried first to reverse the outcome of an unfavorable vote, then made it disappear altogether.

    That’s a headline you won’t see in the MSM.

    Dirtiest trick ever played? Hey, what about the Gingrich who stole Christmas from all the little children?

  24. #26
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:41 am, Brian72 said:

    This is more like what we’ll see from the MSM:

    House Republicans storm off floor in protest of Democrat plan to save poverty stricken little children

  25. #27
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:43 am, The Raging Republican said:

    WOW! I was sure a fist fight was going to break out. It was like watching Parliament in Hong Kong or something.

    Point of note:
    You have to keep in mind that when Pelosi talks about ethics, it is all open for interpretation. Dems practice moral relativeness. There is no black or white. There is no right or wrong. To them there is always an exception to the rule when it comes to morality.

    ‘Morals, we don’t need no stinkin’ morals’.

  26. #28
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:48 am, Just A Grunt said:

    Well my message has been sent to my representative David Scott (D) GA.
    I doubt he reads it but at least I made an attempt to contact the person who is supposed to represent me.

  27. #29
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:50 am, Godzilla said:

    Point of note: You have to keep in mind that when Pelosi talks about ethics, it is all open for interpretation. Dems practice moral relativeness. There is no black or white. There is no right or wrong. To them there is always an exception to the rule when it comes to morality.

    I’d say it’s more of a “well, THEY did it first, so ETHICALLY, we should be allowed to do it” mentality.

  28. #30
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:51 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    TERM LIMITS!!! Our only saviour.

  29. #31
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:53 am, swj719AWG said:

    I’d say it’s more of a “well, THEY did it first, so ETHICALLY, we should be allowed to do it” mentality.

    More like “If we are doing it, it’s ok. If they do it, it’s evil”

  30. #32
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 11:58 am, Boomer said:

    If I knowingly destroy records required by Federal law and/or Air Force Instructions I lose my job and stand a very good chance of going to jail. I guess those above the law get a magical do-over now. Most ethical Congress every, Ha! You just can’t make this stuff up.

  31. #33
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:03 pm, walterc said:

    TERM LIMITS!!! Our only saviour.

    Two terms. . one in office, one in jail.

  32. #34
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:11 pm, Joshua P. Allem said:

    It’s 2000 all over again. Nutroots have been claiming Bush stole the election for the last 7 years but that’s exactly what the Democrats were trying to do. Wait to see how it turns out. If you don’t like the income, count again or keep counting or throw out some old ones until you get it just where you want it, THEN SLAM! The vote is over and the Democrats win. Since we didn’t let that happen in 2000, they say we stole the election. Now we’ve got this 2000-ish absurdity going on all over again inside the House. It’s childish, abhorant, etc… but what else should we expect from Democrats?

  33. #36
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:15 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    God help me but I have been watching CSPAN this morning. Right now they are replaying the “discussion” that happened this morning on the floor about last nights debacle. How do you keep a straight face while referring to the other guy as “My good friend”.

  34. #37
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:15 pm, jferg49 said:

    Are any of us surpised? These slimy “law makers” will go to almost any lengths to get what they want. Unfortunately, our Republican reps are not much better. I’ve said it many times…hold these bastards accountable! Jeeze, we have a rep that was caught with thousands of marked bills in a sting, and he was re-elected and still sits in Congress….how ridiculous is that…and please, don’t give me that, innocent until proven guilty….only an idiot would say he’s innocent…yeah, about as innocent as OJ…at any rate…these slime bags use the courts to circumvent the will of the people…just “modifying” parlimentary procedures isn’t that much of a step for them…time for another revolution….throw all the bums out and start from scratch…term limits and accountability….and long jail terms with huge fines for those found abusing their power…

  35. #38
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:17 pm, Jarhead said:

    I watched this diabolical with the Democrats side last night. I mean they where like a bunch of spoiled kids. God please safe our great country and us from these weasels! Oh the vote did not go our way, so lets change the out come. The Democrats must have gotten taught very well from thier friends Fidel and Hugo. What we need is TERM LIMITS!

  36. #39
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:18 pm, davenp35 said:

    Democrats can gets away with erasing votes in Congress if they don’t get the result they want!?! This is insane!

  37. #40
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:22 pm, MikeB said:

    Good afternoon (on the East Coast), I don’t support this kind of tactic. And, yes Republicans have done similar stuff while in the majority.

    Here’s the question: If the Dems do things properly and above board, when the GOP regains control, will they follow suit? Not bloody likely. That’s the problem with this tit for tat, it goes on forever.

  38. #41
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:25 pm, Jarhead said:

    jferr49; my thoughts exactly! I can’t remember what Republican was speaking at the time I was watching last night when the Democrats started shouting, I’m paraphrasing what he said something like, it now sounds like the English Parliment in hear. I mean these Democrats could care less about this great country. I mean they are so power hungry, it makes the great white look tame in a feeding frenzy.

  39. #42
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:28 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    I have been saying it for a long time, it is time to get all of these professional welfare recipients out of office and lets start with a new crew across the board. At least it should take them a few years to learn all of the back door tactics of circumventing the rules to line their pockets and get in bed with all the different special interests groups.
    The Senate is nothing but a bunch of doddering old AARP members who can’t remember a speech they made 10 minutes ago and only want to get to the bar for Happy Hour and the House sure ain’t representative of any part of the country I have seen. Well okay cept for Pelosi.

  40. #43
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:34 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Copied from my Hot Air post

    I saw an interview by Pelosi on the first 8 months as Speaker and it was appalling. She is nothing more than a mouthpiece saying whatever you want to hear.

    The guy asked her about Congress’ poll disapproval rating (after she railed on the Bush polls), she commented that ‘We don’t legislate on polls’. But without taking a breath she said that the Democrats were doing much better in POLLS in favorability (she said double digit lead). So much for polls not meaning anything to her. They only mean something if they help her case.

    Then the interviewer said so you mostly consider yourself a leader of the Democrats in the House. And she responded indignantly with ‘no, I’m the Speaker of the entire House’. What a tool. Ethical compared to WHAT?!

    I’m always leary of those who have to tell you how good they are. If someone is good, or they do something good, they don’t need to harp on it themselves all the time. Pelosi was talking about everything the Congress has done as ‘historic’. I said before. . . what a tool!

  41. #44
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:38 pm, bear1909 said:

    *Investigate* the Speaker of the House and Impeach.

  42. #46
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:49 pm, Regulus said:

    The Soviets back in the Cold War, whenever they did something to outrage public opinon in the West, had a saying to describe how they could just wait things out and the outrage would go away: “Coming out of the water dry.”

    The Democrat Party has a similar philosophy when it comes to their own political shenanigans. Let their buds in the major media build the “box of silence” around the story, and eventually it’ll go away.

    Cheating and flouting the rules are things Democrats do because they’ve rationalized that “The Greater Good”(TM) requires that they do whatever it takes to be the ones in charge. And as self-appointed guardians of that over-valued ideal, what is acceptable in its defense or advancement inexorably comes to include “By Any Means Necessary” tactics.

    So it’s OK to lie and to cheat and to steal and erase votes, as long as those devices are used in the service of opposing Republicans – which is itself the ultimate expression of “The Greater Good.”

    What happened in the House last night was simply a symptom of Democrats feeling more comfortable being back in the majority. Expect to see more of this kind behavior as the Democrats become more comfortable, and as long as they continue to believe that they can do anything and “Come out of the water dry.”

  43. #47
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:50 pm, ajmontana said:

    I wonder if the Dems can see what their doing is like a guy in the old west watching and listening to them build his Gallows waiting to be hung? Or are they actually this blind and think that Americans (not just republicans) arent watching and taking notes as to how pathetic they have been since Januaury?

  44. #48
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:51 pm, ajmontana said:

    January…opps

  45. #49
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:53 pm, Brian72 said:

    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:22 pm, MikeB said:

    Good afternoon (on the East Coast), I don’t support this kind of tactic. And, yes Republicans have done similar stuff while in the majority.

    Republicans have never done this. This is unprecedented in the history of the House. It’s just plain cheating. They are going to these lengths for illegals, not even Americans! Most ethical Congress, evah!

  46. #50
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:59 pm, gregorystephens said:

    These are the same people that talk about Bush abusing his power. What a crock.

  47. #52
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:02 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    What happened last night is akin to a referee in a football game calling it over when the home team gets ahead, nevermind how much time is on the clock. That guy tried to bang the gavel in between votes when it seemed his side was either ahead or tied. This is pure chutzpah.

  48. #53
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:07 pm, franksalterego said:

    If Moronitude was taxable, those on the Left could wipe out the National Debt, all by themselves.

  49. #54
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:08 pm, Brian72 said:

    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:02 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    I would use the NBA referee throwing games for his own profit. That’s more like this. Something happens you don’t like, just blow the whistle and call foul!

    The Dems get a freethrow.

  50. #55
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:16 pm, puhiawa said:

    So we now resemble the Tiawanese House. Soon we will descend to that of Iraq. All because Pelosi is corrupt.

  51. #56
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:17 pm, gayle said:

    Maybe this sealed the DEMS fate for 2008.

    Their festering sores are becoming widespread. Bandaids just won’t do the trick much longer.

  52. #58
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:28 pm, calamityville said:

    The REAL culture of corruption resides on the left. The debate is over.

  53. #59
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:28 pm, 3Steps said:

    @Regulus

    ’For the Greater Good’ became Grindelwald’s slogan, his justification for all the atrocities he committed later. . . They say ’For the Greater Good’ was even carved over the entrance to Nurmengard.”

    “What’s Nurmengard?”

    “The prison Grindelwald had built to hold his opponents. He ended up in there himself, once Dumbledore had caught him.”

    The name of Grindelwald is justly famous: In a list of Most Dangerous Dark Wizards of All Time, he would miss out on the top spot only because You-Know-Who arrived, a generation later, to steal his crown.

    JK Rowling – Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows…

    the things you learn from children’s books ;-)

  54. #60
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:30 pm, Yashmak said:

    Maybe this sealed the DEMS fate for 2008.

    I kinda doubt it. After all, Obama is still in the running for President even after his patently ridiculous foreign policy statements of the last few days.

  55. #61
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:34 pm, DirkBelig said:

    If the Stupid Party was smart, they’d get a web ad up NOW reading:

    “After losing a vote that would have given American taxpayers’ dollars to illegal immigrants, the Democrat House Leadership ordered the voting to continue until they changed enough votes to win and allow this giveaway. When Republican representatives protested, the Democrat House Leadership erased the original vote from the official record, rewriting history in their favor as if there wasn’t a video record of their cheating. Is this what Nancy Pelosi meant when she promised ‘the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history’? Call the Democrat Leadership and remind them that they’re supposed to represent the citizens of the United States and that we are a nation of laws and rules. If they’re willing to do this in front of cameras, what are they doing in secret?”

    No blather about technical jardon and motions to recommit; no yammering about inside baseball machinations; just simple, clear talk about the Dems naked abuse of power in plain sight and how they’re acting against the peoples’ interests in violation of the rules. Let the Dems twist themselves into Kerry-esque knots trying to explain the nuances of the situation and the tech-babble. As people’s eyes glaze over, they’ll smell the rats.

    That’s what the Stupid Party would do if they were smart. Alas, they aren’t smart. That’s why they’re called the Stupid Party. They’ll let the Treason Media sweep it under the rug or come off as babies (hiya Newt!) and life will go on as before under the Dems jackbooted foot.

  56. #62
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:42 pm, xler8bmw said:

    What I don’t like is they’re voting and passing bills like this after the American People already stood up and said NO to the illegals. So now you want us to continue to pay for them. Why can’t they deport these losers…..

    Wow they are willing to pay for them to be here illegally but, not infrastructure we need amazing. The American People need to start paying attention to what these theives are doing with our tax dollars. Per the constitution “we the people run this country” and have a right to question votes such as this.

  57. #63
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 1:47 pm, Vatar said:

    It was the Montreal Screwjob all over again

  58. #64
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 2:06 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    Has anyone checked for greencards in the Senate&House lately? These clowns aren’t for the American people, that’s for sure.

  59. #65
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 2:15 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #59 LOL

    Well it is surely the jobs they keep talking about that americans won’t do!

  60. #66
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 2:20 pm, swj719AWG said:

    You know what? I have no problem with spending taxpayer money on illegal immigrants.

    What? Deportations ain’t FREE ya know…

  61. #67
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 2:59 pm, gayle said:

    I believe our Congress is infested with the “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”.

    They cannot be real human beings.
    No conscience, no principals, a void where the soul should be, for most anyway.

  62. #68
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 3:01 pm, Dersu said:

    Another meltdown today.

    On C-span now

  63. #69
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 3:28 pm, James Felix said:

    Good afternoon (on the East Coast), I don’t support this kind of tactic. And, yes Republicans have done similar stuff while in the majority.

    That’s simply not true. For five years the Republicans had unassailable majorities in both houses of congress and the presidency. Had they resorted to this kind of bannana republic strong-arm crap then their entire agenda would have been enacted and all their judges confirmed, which obviously didn’t happen.

  64. #70
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 4:42 pm, DirkBelig said:

    The shamnesty supporters always bleat, “You can’t deport X million people.”

    Sure you can. It’s easy and if you’ve seen “Sea of Love”, you’ll recognize the method. Announce that benefit checks must be picked up at the office. When they show up, you load them on the bus and ship ‘em out! Problem solved!!!

    And for the bleeding hearts like Geraldo who weep for the anchor babies who are left alone here when their invader parents are sent packing, I’ve got one question: WHAT’S KEEPING US FROM SENDING THE KIDS ALONG WITH THEM?!?

    We can keep families together easily. We just need to will to keep them together in their native lands, not our conquered territory.

  65. #71
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    Unfortunately, I seem to remember a vote in the Senate (some time in ‘05 or ‘06?) where the voting was kept open for an inordinately long amount of time while Senate leadership encouraged fellow Republicans to vote for something they weren’t enthusiastic about voting for. It sounds similar enough for many to think it sounds like the same thing. However, AFAIK, there was no effort to get Republicans who had already cast their vote to change it—an important distinction, to me anyway.

    What I don’t get is that the original vote has been reported as 215-213, and the final official vote as 212-216 at House Rollcall Record, but MM lists four House members who changed their votes. Did someone change their vote in the other direction? (I’ve checked, and all four representatives named above are listed as finally voting Nay.)

  66. #72
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 5:10 pm, leepro said:

    On August 3rd, 2007 at 12:03 pm, walterc said:

    TERM LIMITS!!! Our only saviour.

    Two terms. . one in office, one in jail.

    Don’t we already have that? The only thing is, you have to complete the loop:
    one in office, one in jail –> lifetime pension!

  67. #73
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 5:12 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Unfortunately, I seem to remember a vote in the Senate (some time in ‘05 or ‘06?) where the voting was kept open for an inordinately long amount of time while Senate leadership encouraged fellow Republicans to vote for something they weren’t enthusiastic about voting for. It sounds similar enough for many to think it sounds like the same thing. However, AFAIK, there was no effort to get Republicans who had already cast their vote to change it—an important distinction, to me anyway.

    That is absolutely NOT that same thing.

    That was a vote kept open.

    This vote was ended. ENDED. and then the Dems tried to change the outcome. And when it wasn’t what they liked, they removed it from the record.

    HOW is that even REMOTELY like what you described??

  68. #74
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 6:07 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    swj,

    It’s in the voting record. It’s in the voting record as a Republican loss, 212-216. It seems that when the vote was almost complete, a few Republicans who’d voted against it switched their votes, and they were enough to change it from failing to passing. At first, the presiding Democrat tried to stop the voting by banging his gavel, but after that, four Democrats who’d voted for it were allowed to switch their votes—after the voting had been ended! So, I agree with you, it’s very different from what the Republicans did in the Senate. However, to many, it will sound like the same thing.

    Do you remember how Bush did not call for a recount in New Mexico in 2000? He made that decision because, to many members of the general public, the details wouldn’t have mattered, and they would have concluded he was a hypocrite for being against what was happening in Florida while calling for a recount in New Mexico.

  69. #75
    On August 3rd, 2007 at 7:19 pm, hadsil said:

    When I was in college the “Mandatory Student Activity Fee” was up for renewal. This was a “tax” all students had to pay that would go to the student governemt to distribute among various student clubs and organizations.

    There was a big campaign against it. When the election happened, the fee failed to pass. The student government invalidated the election and set up a revote. The Treasurer was witnessed saying “I don’t care how many times we have to vote as long as it passes.”

    I wondered whatever happened to them.

  70. #80
    On August 4th, 2007 at 7:52 pm, doingwhatican said:

    The dems are getting even bolder in their lying, cheating and stealing. It’s astounding, and yet they believe they can have their way no matter how the house votes.

    This was not an insignificant vote. The dems were sneaking in the legalization of welfare for illegal aliens and the Republicans were trying to block it.

  71. #81
    On August 4th, 2007 at 8:14 pm, ScottyDog said:

    “It’s in the voting record. It’s in the voting record as a Republican loss, 212-216.”

    That was the vote on the unconstitutional CAFTA treaty. The RNC bribed their members with billions of dollars to change their votes. One vote was changed without the permission of the representative which allowed it to pass. Do a google.

    On congress and President have become so corrupt that is makes me sick.

    This is not the American that I fought for and was brought up in the 1960’s.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook