“Why doesn’t someone just make a video/ad consisting of Hillary and Obama at the Kos convention speaking, and in between their Marxist soundbites, show screen shots from Kos diarists, (like the moral retards statements about our troops…)? It would be very effective. No voice over necessary. Everything would speak for itself.”

Great idea, Foxforce. Maybe this is the kind of effort it’s going to take. I’m not U-Tube savvy, but I do know video production. I think it’s time to roll the sleeves up and get crankin’.

Okay my daily Imus comment so Hillary Clinton, is taking credit for establishing Media Matters, then Hillary’s folks did make the Political Hit on Don Imus. I hope he is back on air sooner then later and we get to hear even more on the subject. This is an arrow in the quiver for the Conservatives, this is an attack on Free Speech.

The rest, you know you would think, the woman would listen to her husband and stop BUTT KISSING the uber left. Hillary you are running for President of the whole country not just LA and NYC, she may make it through the primarys but this visit to this org is going to come back and haunt her in the National Election. Why does she want to alienate the Independents and the Swing Vote? Who does she think is going to get her elected to the highest seat in the land? Hillary Clinton, is arming the Opposition, they are adding arrows to their quivers, everyday she panders.

“If whomever is going to challenge the Democrats to an FNC debate are successful in getting them to engage on that turf, then we will still have to wait and see if the outcome is anywhere near what you are suggesting.”

The suggested outcome is very similar, speaking of old maxims, to “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. What we have in the Democrats now is a party which more or less appears to believe that if they can only skirt the few venues that are not in their tent, that they can say or do just about anything without having to worry about being held accountable enough to concern themselves with such uncomfortable matters as logic, consistancy or providing the people with an honest, even debate on the issues for the education of the electorate before a primary. That’s the beginnings of a country shading into a dictatorship.

“You assume that my view is based on *speculation*. I am keeping in mind, however, the old adage which says “The map is not the terrain.” The adage speaks to both of our positions.”

I don’t want to beat this point to death, and am happy top let it go if you will, but in response once again I have to say that your apparent lack of desire to hold the Democrat candidates to anywhere near a level playing field in the election appears to suppose a certain set of results with or without the debate. I’m simply saying first and foremost that the playing field is more level if they debate on Fox than if they don’t. In my mind this is a critical issue in a time when the liberal aspect of the MSM already outnumbers its conservative counterpoint 9 – 1. It’s also an aspect of the election in which the courage of the candidates can be made an issue, and rightfully so. These are not small issues.

Mark Twain’s brilliance was wasted on his time. We need him now.

The problem with hoping that Petraeus’ report to the congress will have a potential negative impact on the Democrats is representative of what this whole issue is about: the Petraeus report, like everything else, will be strained, spun and filtered through the liberal media prism. We’ve never seen supposed news organizations so blatantly, unapologetically and arrogantly biased in favor of one side and actively prejudiced toward the other. The Petraeus’ report will only have media legs if there is something that supports a viewpoint which will further the prospects of the Democrat candidates.

The left wing media learned some important lessons over the past 15 years: instead of attacking the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity, they now ignore them, and by that I mean shut out the impact of their voices except to their immediate audiences. They used to do conservatives an unintentional favor by ridiculing the right wing radio media, because in so doing they called attention to those commentators and being able to stand on their own, those commentators were able to achieve some conversion among the masses. Now there’s as much of a blackout as is possible, and you can see the results not just in Presidential polling, but polling on specific issues, which reflect a majority of Americans parroting the MSM, regardless of how sensless some of those points of view may be in the cold light of day.

To get back in the game, the right needs to somehow get the left onto their turf again once in a while to have some kind of meaningful debate on the world stage. By speficially boycotting Fox, the Democrat Presidential Candidates have given the right a desperately needed opportunity to call them out on the boycott under its more appropriate name, cowardice, and either have that as a defined issue – and that’s a killer – or get them on Fox news, where mining for sound bite prospects are indeed much better than under the current circumstances. Once again, the only way for conservatives to lose on this issue is to do what many are already doing: sit on the issue and assume it’s a non-issue, and carried to its logical conclusion, that’s a blueprint for an election disaster.

So often the right has lost painfully in elections where winning seemed so simple merely because the mindset of the politically-oriented right assumes that the larger electorate can somehow understand issues even if those issues are not clearly put before them and repeated enough to be remembered. The left has known the reverse for decades, and the right better start learning the fallicy of their mindset in a very short number of months, because while we talk a wide variety of issues on the basis of their intellectual honesty, the left is putting everything through an election-cycle filter, and the elections of 08 will be upon us before we know it.

We can simplify it easily, though, for the people on this board: Everyone on this board either has 1. the majority extremely negative view of the Democrat candidates or 2. is on the left and knows how the majoprity feels on the issue. For the former group, the fact that the Democrats refuse to debate on the one network they admit they feel doesn’t favor them is enough to demand that they debate in that venue on at least a few occasions, and to demand it as loudly and frequently as possible, and to begin making those demands immediately.

This woman is so shallow.
Hillary, in her quest to be everything to everybody, panders to the Kos Kids in a left wing socialist diatribe to win the nutroots’ endorsement for 2008. Perhaps the Kos-sacks of s..t can help her chance of elect…

The space channel, that is hilarious! I think Zsa Zsa Huffington IS from another world all together.

The other large reception she got was when she said she was going to fix health care. What she didn’t say was that she was going to fix it by taking as much money from ‘we the people’ as it takes. Even if that means bankrupting the entire country.

I think she needs to be referred to as Hillary Tax Clinton just to make sure everyone knows what she’ll do if she’s elected. She may fix some problems, but she will take your money. That makes her unelectable.

The libs have gravitated so far to the left that she is considered a “conservative”. The left is stuck with her unless they start up the “Draft Al Gore” machine. He’s anti-war, anti-gun and these lunatics love that ‘globaloney warming’ crap.