About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Saturday night bomb scare Update: Map added Update: Sunday developments Update: Monday follow-up…charges filed

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 5, 2007 12:05 AM

Update 8/6 1:45pm Eastern: Authorities are filing felony explosive charges against the two Middle Eastern men arrested over the weekend…”Authorities in South Carolina are filing charges against two men in connection with a weekend bomb scare. Yousef Megahed, 21, and Ahmed Mohamed, 24, are facing explosives charges. The two men are USF students. The Berkeley County Sheriff’s Office reportedly found a bomb and bomb-making materials — including chemicals, fuses and igniters — in the trunk of the suspects’ car.”

If you believe CAIR, they’re just “naive” University of South Florida students who were on an innocent road trip.

Yeah, that University of South Florida.

Dan Riehl and John Little have more. Writes John: “This case has been weird from the start and I don’t think that’s going to change anytime soon.”

Update 8/5 8:45pm Eastern. Law enforcement in SC will hold a press conference tomorrow on the case. John Little notes the odd handling of the incident to date. Dan Riehl notes the shifting MSM stories.
Here’s a photo of the suspects. Say cheese:

goosecreek.jpg

The men 21-year-old Yousef Megahed and 24-year-old Ahmed Mohamed were pulled over Saturday evening during a routine traffic stop near Myers Road and Highway 176. Among the explosive devices found were igniters and fusers. Few details about the suspects are known at this time. They are believed to be students at a Florida college. They are of Middle Eastern descent and are not US citizens. Neither man has been charged, but charges are expected Monday. A press conference will be held in Berkeley County on Monday morning. Among the potential charges is possession of unlawful explosives.

***

Tons of readers are e-mailing me about an incident tonight in Charleston, S.C. It’s way too early to tell what this is all about, but here’s a local report via PJM:

Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m. The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent. Inside police found explosive devices. Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down. In addition to the FBI (website) , authorities from Goose Creek, Berkeley County, and South Carolina Law Enforcement Division are on scene. The Charleston County bomb squad has also been called. Officials on scene say that neighbors are in no immediate danger. They also report that they are unsure if a crime has been committed.

Dan Riehl is following developments.

Another local report, from WISTV, here:

The FBI and the Berkeley County Sheriff’s Department are investigating what they think are explosives found in a car in Goose Creek.

Police say part of Highway 176 in Berkeley County is closed, and traffic is limited to local residents around Mount Holly Road.

WIS News 10’s sister station in Charleston, WCBD, reports authorities pulled over a suspicious car at around 6:00pm Saturday. Officers asked to search the vehicles, and discovered what investigators say are “possible explosives” located in the trunk.

Once federal agents were brought in and analyzed the situation, an FBI-controlled robot pulled a bag filled with the suspicious items from the vehicle.

The two men inside the vehicle, which is reported to have Florida tags, have been detained at the scene.

Update via Allah: “No immediate threat.”

FWIW.

Update: Via commenter/blogger Pal2Pal, some interesting info about the area where the car was pulled over…

My husband spent the last three years of his Navy career stationed at the Naval Weapons Station, located in Goose Creek, South Carolina. He was the Dockmaster on the floating drydock, USS Alamogordo. The Gordo’s main purpose was to dock our nuclear submarines for repairs. The weapons station was often closed to civilian traffic as they moved nukes and ordinance to and from ships with Marine guards on orders to shoot to kill.

Highway 176 leads to the base.

Map added…

mapgc.jpg

Another interesting detail about the base:

Authorities closed a highway outside Charleston for more than five hours Saturday night after police found explosives in the trunk of a car, a newspaper reported, citing an FBI agent. Julie Johnson, assistant special agent-in-charge for the FBI in Columbia, said there was “no immediate threat,” according to The (Charleston) Post and Courier.

Law enforcement officials closed the road about 7 p.m. after the traffic stop in Goose Creek, home to the Naval Weapons Station. The station houses the U.S. Naval Consolidated Brig, a military prison where enemy combatants have been held.

John Little pulls together more interesting tidbits like this one in bold:

According to Lt. Vince Lombardo, deputies discovered the suspicious items in the trunk during a traffic stop. The two men inside the vehicle are detained at the scene. Lombardo also said information from an investigation in another jurisdiction raised the suspicions of the deputies.

And this one:

At 11:45 p.m., Julie Johnson, assistant special agent-in-charge, FBI-Columbia, told reporters amassed at the Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses that she would answer no questions, but that the FBI was still trying to determine if a crime had been committed.

She said the agency was working with state and local agencies, and that they were going to be there a long time.

Little reports: “I just got off the phone someone from the Naval Weapons Station. ‘Nobody has any comment’ is all I could get out of them. It was a very annoyed ‘no comment’ at that.”

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Breaking: Vehicle Loaded With Explosives Found in SC; "Middle-Eastern Descent"; Updated
  2. Nice Deb Possible Terror Attack Disrupted In SC «
  3. » Breaking: Bomb Scare in South Carolina
  4. Ace of Spades HQ
  5. Riehl World View
  6. Bill's Bites
  7. Leaning Straight Up
  8. Sierra Faith
  9. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » Co-rinkidink or dry runs?
  10. Gubatron
  11. Infidels Are Cool » Blog Archive » Two “middle eastern” men caught with explosives near US Naval Base
  12. NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » South Carolina Highway Closed After Cops Find a ‘Supicious Item’ in Car’s Trunk
  13. Terrorism at Naval Weapons Station? | Hennessy's View
  14. Americas North Shore Journal
  15. MKAnderson
  16. Berkeley County bomb scare » The Palmetto Scoop
  17. Pajamas Media
  18. The TIW Blog » Blog Archive » The FBI is just plain INSANE!
  19. GraniteGrok
  20. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Two Middle Eastern Men Arrested on Bomb Charges
  21. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Update: Press Conference on South Carolina Arrest
  22. The TIW Blog » Blog Archive » South Carolina Jihad Update
  23. southchild » Blog Archive » Jihad: Battlefield America
  24. Michelle Malkin » Mystery at Goose Creek: Who are the accused Pipe Bomb Boys?
  25. Tel-Chai Nation

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:14 am, Dersu said:

    Thanks for being on top of it, I had not heard and FXNWS is on in the background.

  2. #2
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:19 am, Dersu said:

    Careful AJ, but I agree

  3. #3
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:20 am, ajmontana said:

    sorry….emotions got the better of me again…..

  4. #4
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:21 am, ajmontana said:

    I’ll rephraise….Do we have to just ask them politely what they were up to?

  5. #5
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:52 am, swj719AWG said:

    No immediate threat???

    There were BOMBS in the CAR. That’s pretty freaking immediate if you were to ask me.

    I wish I had gotten to see aj’s original comment…

    I don’t care how they ask. Get the information out of these two…

  6. #6
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:58 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    It has not yet been established that there were “bombs in the car.” There are conflicting reports.

  7. #7
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:03 am, Dersu said:

    Another trick to get a lawsuit?

    Or cry about racial profiling.

  8. #8
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:09 am, Pal2Pal said:

    Well, 176 leads right into the Naval Weapons Station, Goose Creek, SC and nowhere else. I wrote about it on my blog, but I’ll repeat, we were stationed there for 3 years and NSW is home to our nuclear submarines and nuclear ordinance and our Nuclear Traning Facility. And I’m not talking about a few guns and some ammo, more like 60 million lbs. of conventional ordinance and who knows how much nuke material and warheads. Civilians were not allowed on base when nuke material was being moved to or from subs or ships and Marine guards had orders to shoot to kill anyone approaching a transport vehicle.

  9. #9
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:09 am, ajmontana said:

    Yeah, they “pulled over a suspicious vehicle”, makes ya wonder what they were doing that drew officers attention to them.

  10. #10
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:20 am, swj719AWG said:

    176 leads right into the Naval Weapons Station, Goose Creek

    I knew Goose Creek rung a bell, but I couldn’t place it…

    Yeah, they “pulled over a suspicious vehicle”, makes ya wonder what they were doing that drew officers attention to them.

    The cry will be “Driving while middle-eastern”…

  11. #11
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:21 am, puhiawa said:

    So Mid-Eastern means they are from Ohio? Quakers again?

  12. #12
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:38 am, swj719AWG said:

    Quakers again?

    I knew we couldn’t trust those buggy-drivers…

    Oh sure, they look all peaceful and propper in their vests and hats and long beards, but I knew they were up to something…

  13. #13
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:42 am, palani said:

    Hopefully, this turns out to be nothing, but our police seem particularly effective at pulling over would-be criminals, and worse, with “routine” traffic stops.

    I tried to find a previous post from someone lamenting what she believed to be inadequate security at a Charlotte (SC?) shopping mall. It seemed kind of silly to me, unless one wishes that we raise our alert status to super-paranoid levels. Unfortunately, murderous Islamic death cultists can strike at random places and random times, but how much of our freedom do we voluntarily relinquish?

  14. #14
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:50 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Picking up on another post, things are so convoluted right now across the board nationally that one can easily imagine this to be some kind of set-up to put the US on the defensive about racial profiling - so a real attack can be more easily carried out. They watch us minute by minute, and guage our responses accordingly, so this, absurdist as it sounds, is not at all impossible.

    Therefore,

    I hope it was an actual terrorist act about to be committed. Why? Because it gives us a better excuse in the face of the hords of ACLU lawyers to use such common-sense measures as racial profiling (yeah, I think it’s a perfectly intelligent, common-sense approach to law inforcement, as politically incorrect as it sounds) and the uncomfortable detention of suspects and anything else which common sense deems appropriate when dealing with murder on a gigantic scale being planned and designed by combatants who refuse to play by the rules of the Geneva Convention.

  15. #15
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:59 am, Pal2Pal said:

    swj719AWG - Quakers don’t drive a buggy, the Amish do. They are very different. Quakers look like everyone else. Chelsea Clinton went to a private Quaker school in Washington. Swarthmore is a Quaker college. They have some of the best genealogy records in their church records of anyone in the U.S. but are best known for being conscientious objectors/pacifists.

  16. #16
    On August 5th, 2007 at 2:00 am, DesertLover said:

    It will be interesting to hear more in the morning as to the investigation of this incident …

    if the individuals had explosives legally they should have been able to immediately produce their federal ATF license granting them permission to have them …

    transporting explosives requires multiple levels of permits, special handling and proper vehicle markings … I don’t think that includes “a passenger vehicle” …

    I have a friend who works in the professional fireworks display field who deals with immense scrutiny and legal hoops just to give us the pleasure of fireworks on July 4th and at ball games and such … so this sounds suspicious at first glance

    Thanks as always Michelle …

  17. #17
    On August 5th, 2007 at 2:32 am, Myra Langerhas said:

    No evidence it is terrorist so please don’t treat it as such, dont play into their hands.

  18. #18
    On August 5th, 2007 at 3:58 am, Loose Cannon said:

    I certainly hope the FBI agents on the scene remember the lessons learned at their sensitivity training sessions. Jerkoff and CAIR are watching.

  19. #19
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:19 am, zorro said:

    Thanks for staying up late to keep the information flowing. MM.com and Hot Air have been my source of “important” news since last year’s war in Lebanon.

    Whether or not there are bombs on the car, one thing is for sure, our guys are on guard and are doing yeoman’s work.

    UPDATE for Allah, KP is on Fox and Friends and it’s 7:17AM!

  20. #20
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:27 am, Jaded said:

    from the DHS “it is not an act of terrorism” I guess that will be the next thing we hear because nothing says “not terrorism” like a car with bombs in it:-)

  21. #21
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:30 am, Dandapani said:

    Waiting for the usual response: “We don’t know what this event is all about, but we are certain it isn’t related to terrorism!” :ROLLEYES:

  22. #22
    On August 5th, 2007 at 8:03 am, Jaded said:

    Here is an interesting story for “not terrorism” in another country to our north.
    http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2007/08/05/4394957-sun.html

  23. #23
    On August 5th, 2007 at 8:32 am, olblueyes said:

    still sounds fishy. maybe what they had in their trunk was just half the materials to make a bomb with the rest stashed somewhere close by in a safe house. I hope the Feds are monitoring these guys now, if they weren’t already. Now that makes me wonder why they were stopped in the first place. Are we really getting this lucky or is it possible the Feds relayed some information to the local authorities to check it out, just in case.

  24. #24
    On August 5th, 2007 at 9:49 am, The Raging Republican said:

    I’ve spent a good amount of time in Charleston…… Despite what Keith Olbermann (D) will have to say about it, That naval base is definately a high value target. All these reports have been spot on. They have housed some big name enemy combatants (i.e. Terrorists), and there are nukes a-plenty there.

  25. #25
    On August 5th, 2007 at 11:38 am, LC said:

    Goose Creek, SC is also home to the Naval Nuclear Power Training Program and Nuclear Power Training Unit (Prototype).

  26. #26
    On August 5th, 2007 at 12:13 pm, Latino said:

    Are we sure they are explosives? Maybe its just extra spicy hummus.

  27. #27
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, Loose Cannon said:

    Interstate highway shut down in both directions, ATF, FBI, local bomb squad robot to remove “item” … must have been a non-event.

  28. #28
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:42 pm, mustng66 said:

    “No immediate threat”

    Huh? For me every time a Muslim is found with any type of explosives its an immediate threat.

  29. #29
    On August 5th, 2007 at 1:44 pm, gayle said:

    Most of my mother’s relatives are from Charleston…and a cousin in GC.

    The naval base definitely could have been a target. Maybe even the Citadel…..now that would be interesting.

  30. #30
    On August 5th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, bear1909 said:

    So far it sounds like a probe. I hope the Navy initiates renewed full background checks on any contractors at the facility and of course, all minor to mid level players with security clearances.

    If this Nation is going to get hurt it will be by the people who are on the inside.

    The idea that these kinds of high value attacks are being planned strictly from the outside would be naive on our parts.

    After watching “BREACH” the other night we must be vigilant about our intelligence assets being used against us.

  31. #31
    On August 5th, 2007 at 3:15 pm, Jim M. said:

    Another incident involving activities close to Naval Weapons installations.

    In March of 2006, Adnan e-Shukrijumah Was sighted by eyewitnesses in Kern County California. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49061.

    He is one of the FBI’s most wanted http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/elshukrijumah.htm. He has been described as the US’s most dangerous fugitive, and is believed to be the man in charge of plans for a nuke attack within the US http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46158.

    What most people do not know is the Kern County is home to the US Navy’s weapons research center and serves as depot.

    This current report of activity on the opposite coast from California involving a naval weapons center should be sounding alarms within Homeland Security.

  32. #32
    On August 5th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, bear1909 said:

    I will be interested to see the cause of this “routine traffic stop”.

  33. #33
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:10 pm, Dersu said:

    On August 5th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, bear1909 said:

    I will be interested to see the cause of this “routine traffic stop”.

    FROM : RIEHL WORLD VIEW

    GOOSE CREEK, S.C. - Two men were detained after police found and detonated a suspicious item found in their car during a routine stop for a speeding violation on a highway near Charleston, Berkeley County sheriff’s Lt. Vince Lombard said Sunday morning.

    Lombard said the men were being held pending a charge of unlawful possession of an explosive device, but he would not say what the device was or what bomb technicians from neighboring Charleston County exploded about 2:45 a.m. Sunday.

    The item made a loud bang, similar to a firecracker, when it was demolished.

  34. #34
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    I can’t say what I’m thinking, Michelle would ban me for life;but no immediate threat, LOL

  35. #35
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pm, bear1909 said:

    Dersu#33- on the case i see. Thanks.

    PS: your “name” reminds me of one of the best movies i’ve ever seen “Dersu Uzala”….Russian flick.

  36. #36
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol backwards its US-RED…. :)

  37. #37
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pm, ajmontana said:

    A firecracker? Sure the NY Times wernt the drivers?

  38. #38
    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, purplepeep said:

    Updated story:

    Possession of Unlawful Explosives Charges Being Prepared

    Some type of explosives were found in the trunk. Those explosives were detonated after three o’clock this morning. Two men were arrested, and charges of possession of unlawful explosives are being prepared. Officials are not at this time releasing any additional information on the number of charges or types of explosive devices they found.

  39. #39
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pm, swj719AWG said:

    but he would not say what the device was or what bomb technicians from neighboring Charleston County exploded about 2:45 a.m. Sunday.

    I’m gonna hazard a guess that it was explosives…

    No threat… Bull freaking shoot there was “no immediate threat”. My right… Ummm… Eye. Yeah, that’s it. My right eye.

    It’s official. I shall now take the oposite position as DHS on all matters I don’t see coroborated by at least 3 sources.

    My father calls it the “MacNamara Effect”.

  40. #40
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, Dersu said:

    fuses and caps, 2 muslim men with no right to be here. Think they came in from where.
    Mexico maybe?

  41. #41
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:15 pm, Dersu said:

    On August 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pm, bear1909 said:

    Dersu#33- on the case i see. Thanks.

    PS: your “name” reminds me of one of the best movies i’ve ever seen “Dersu Uzala”….Russian flick.

    That is it, and the book is better.
    I have the book and DVD.
    Dersu my fictional hero.
    Ronald Reagan my real life hero.
    Soliders giving their limbs and lives for us, my war heroes.

    For those that want to know more, click here

  42. #42
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:19 pm, ajmontana said:

    Why cant they just spill the beans and let us know what the heck is going on? Is there a time limit on the Freedom of information act or does that even play in?

  43. #43
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, Dersu said:

    AJ,
    I should have said that Clinton news network reported:

    fuses and caps, 2 muslim men with no right to be here.

  44. #44
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:28 pm, Dersu said:

    CNN (Clinton news network) is about to have another report on it. After the commercial.

    Sorry sate of affairs having to watch this channel, but they are on it.

    FXNSW, have nor seen anything yet on it.
    Not to say I did not miss it.

  45. #45
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:29 pm, ajmontana said:

    Yeah, I’ve read all the links from you guys (ty) but geez, I guess I’m just a lil impatient today. Between this story and the Hostages I’m goin nutso.

  46. #46
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:37 pm, Pal2Pal said:

    I have just added this update to Pal2Pal:

    Afternoon update from abcnews.com:

    Goose Creek - Two men are being held in the Berkeley County Detention Center after police find explosive making devices in their car. The men 21-year-old Yousef Megahed and 24-year-old Ahmed Mohamed were pulled over Saturday evening during a routine traffic stop near Myers Road and Highway 176. Among the explosive devices found were igniters and fusers. Few details about the suspects are known at this time. They are believed to be students at a Florida college. They are of Middle Eastern descent and are not US citizens. Neither man has been charged, but charges are expected Monday. A press conference will be held at the Berkeley County Sheriff’s office Monday at 11:30 in the morning. Among the potential charges is possession of unlawful explosives. Officials are not at this time releasing any additional information on the number of charges or types of explosive devices they found. Highway 176 in Goose Creek was shut down and has since reopened. Stay tuned to ABC News 4 and http://www.abcnews4.com for details as they become available.

  47. #47
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:41 pm, Dersu said:

    If they are students, I may have heard CNN
    incorrectly.

    Likely here on student visa.

    Not much better though, just a little.

  48. #48
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:43 pm, ajmontana said:

    Vewy Intawesting……..

  49. #49
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:45 pm, Pal2Pal said:

    Note: earlier reports say the “routine traffic stop” was based on info from another jurisdiction, so I don’t think it was so routine. They were watching for these guys and probably have info that they are part of a larger plot of some kind.

  50. #50
    On August 5th, 2007 at 5:53 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well by now I’m sure alot of other places are being searched/investigated and the wheels are movin….Score 1 for the Home Team…. :)

  51. #51
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:18 pm, purplepeep said:

    Pal2Pal said:
    Note: earlier reports say the “routine traffic stop” was based on info from another jurisdiction, so I don’t think it was so routine. They were watching for these guys and probably have info that they are part of a larger plot of some kind.

    I dunno, Pal. If this were some kind of anti-terrorist operation I suspect the Feds would have closed in on these guys instead of the local police.

  52. #52
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:26 pm, bear1909 said:

    Chances are more than one cell node was heading in that direction making it necessary for the local gendarmes to make the grab.

    Bet it dint take long for the Feds to show up.

  53. #53
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:32 pm, ajmontana said:

    Any guesses as to the odds of this scumbags/students being deported?

  54. #54
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:32 pm, ajmontana said:

    (these)

  55. #55
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:37 pm, purplepeep said:

    ajmontana said:
    Any guesses as to the odds of this scumbags/students being deported?

    Word is they’s a hooskow for terrorists close at hand, ajm. No sense in puttin’ ‘em back on the “battlefield”.

  56. #56
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, ajmontana said:

    I’m good with that if they stay say….4evah

  57. #57
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, Dersu said:

    jail first,then deport.

    Let them make some new american friends in prison for a few years.

  58. #58
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:41 pm, Dersu said:

    Going to my hunting camp for a few days, need to hear some gunfire.

    You folks keep’em at bay!

  59. #59
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:41 pm, bear1909 said:

    Terrorism is an inside job…they have lotsa help.

    http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/mark-steyn-jihad-1797347-exposs-column

  60. #60
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:42 pm, Pal2Pal said:

    I dunno, Pal. If this were some kind of anti-terrorist operation I suspect the Feds would have closed in on these guys instead of the local police.

    The earliest news report I saw said the FBI was on the scene. That is what sent up my own red flags.

  61. #61
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:50 pm, purplepeep said:

    Pal2Pal said:
    The earliest news report I saw said the FBI was on the scene.

    I hadn’t seen that, though I may have missed it.

    The only way that scenerio would make sense would be if the Feds wanted these guys to believe it was just a “routine stop” in order to take them & the car into custory easier. Kind of a Rube Golbergian way of going about things, but I suppose it could happen.

    Latest from the local Fox channel -
    “The men had atleast one ready to go bomb and bomb making materials that include chemicals.”

  62. #62
    On August 5th, 2007 at 6:51 pm, purplepeep said:

    make that “local ABC channel”.

  63. #63
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:05 pm, Pal2Pal said:

    purplepeep: from the abcnews4 report, I think their very first report:

    Goose Creek - Berkeley County police pulled over a vehicle in a routine traffic stop near Meyers Road and Highway 1-76 around 6 p.m. The vehicle with Florida tags was driven by two men of Middle Eastern descent. Inside police found explosive devices. Highway 1-76 near Goose Creek has since been shut down. In addition to the FBI (website) , authorities from Goose Creek, Berkeley County, and South Carolina Law Enforcement Division are on scene. The Charleston County bomb squad has also been called.

  64. #64
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:07 pm, DesertLover said:

    As I understand the “traffic stop” was for speeding … and I know that in many areas law enforcement is cooperating with adjacent jurisdictions and requesting assistance so they can back off and give the appearance of the perps getting away so they drop their guard and also to lessen the chance of innocent bystanders getting hurt by the get-away attempt resulting in a big wreck …

    Still seems to be conflicting reports as to exactly what they had …

    As I mentioned in my earlier post (#16) it looks like the initial charges are going to be unauthorized possession of explosives … so no ATF license for possession or transport of explosives was issued to them …

    Look forward to hearing what they have to say in that news conference on Monday

  65. #65
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:20 pm, purplepeep said:

    Thanks, Pal. But that doesn’t say they were there when these guys were pulled over.

    I read it as the other officials were there after the fact.

    They were “called in” as was the County bomb squad. If this were a planned terrorist bust I would expect Fed officers would have made the bust and had their own people on hand (e.g. instead of a County bomb squad)

    And since this article - and all subsequent articles - state upfront that it was a routine stop it makes sense to me as it is without expanding.

    You may think differently, though.

  66. #66
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:23 pm, purplepeep said:

    DesertLover said:
    Look forward to hearing what they have to say in that news conference on Monday

    Yup, indeedy. I imagine there’s a lotta agencies checking out a lotta stuff on the two.

  67. #67
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:24 pm, Pal2Pal said:

    To tell the truth purplepeep, I didn’t really think it through that far. I see your point. I guess I made the assumption that the “tip” from another jurisdiction had something to do with the FBI and when local cops pulled over the right car, they notified the FBI immediately and they beat feet to the scene. Of course, it was the middle of the night when I was posting about all this and I can’t vouch for my brain being more than mush.

  68. #68
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:36 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    After the TV series ‘Cops’ (surely the MM crowd watched :-), I expected more speculation about how a “routine” traffic stop became a search of the car’s trunk. Look at the photos again. The car is not the kind where, with the vinyl cover removed, the trunk’s contents are visible. There are many reasons that will stand up in court for the police to open a trunk yet the ‘plain view’ rule seemingly does not apply here. That reason, once stated in the complaint when the two are arraigned, will perhaps confirm or deny the alleged alert from “another jurisdiction.” The driver could have verbally agreed to the search or the search could have been legally made subsequent to their arrest. I also noted where a gas can was taken from the trunk so perhaps it was an inspection following the police officers smelling the heavy oder of gasoline.

  69. #69
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:44 pm, purplepeep said:

    Pal2Pal said:
    I guess I made the assumption that the “tip” from another jurisdiction had something to do with the FBI

    That could be, Pal.

    But I tend to think that could be a police officer from another county or something like that. Especially since the FBI has juridiction regardless of the state, county, other local governmental boundries that limit local police and county sheriff types.

  70. #70
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:50 pm, purplepeep said:

    Sergeant Tim said
    That reason, once stated in the complaint when the two are arraigned, will perhaps confirm or deny the alleged alert from “another jurisdiction.”

    Hiya Sgt -
    Could’ve been a routine traffic violation heads up from a Sheriff from an adjoining county spotted but was too busy to pursue. That’s just speculation, tho.

    The driver could have verbally agreed to the search or the search could have been legally made subsequent to their arrest.

    Yup, court will be interesting. Should find out what the “probable cause” was then, if not before.

  71. #71
    On August 5th, 2007 at 7:53 pm, purplepeep said:

    From the local ABC channel -

    FBI reports are saying that there is not believed to be a link to terrorism.

    yeah, lots of people take their bombs out for a nice drive in the country….

  72. #72
    On August 5th, 2007 at 8:20 pm, swj719AWG said:

    FBI reports are saying that there is not believed to be a link to terrorism.

    I officially no longer believe a thing the FBI tells me.

  73. #73
    On August 5th, 2007 at 9:01 pm, Bruce said:

    I just LOVED the Channel 4 headline:

    “No Link to Terror”

    Well, excuse me, but two Arabs with bombs? Seems like classic textbook terror to me!

    What’s wrong with the FBI? Why can’t we call terrorists “terrorists any more?

    Maybe allowing Muslims with bombs is one more “reasonable accommodation” we have made to make these folks feel like their religion is more accepted?

  74. #74
    On August 5th, 2007 at 9:32 pm, Gabe said:

    What’s wrong with the FBI? Why can’t we call terrorists “terrorists any more?

    The FBI has made it clear it thinks the biggest threat to America is Islamophobia and not terrorism by Muslims: http://www.fbijobs.gov/043.asp
    It is outrageous; they have two Middle Eastern college students not from this country with bombs. . .and they say it is not “terrorism.”

    This is what sensitivity training brainwashing will do to an agency.

  75. #75
    On August 5th, 2007 at 9:35 pm, gayle said:

    Wonder if Christians decided to carry bible bombs if we’d be considered non threatening.

    Yeah, sure. Right.

  76. #76
    On August 5th, 2007 at 9:45 pm, ajmontana said:

    OK, Lets not call them Terrorists, how bout Moderate Progressives?

  77. #77
    On August 5th, 2007 at 10:29 pm, nbarry said:

    The FBI’s pronouncements are right out of Groucho Marx: “Who do you believe, me or your own two eyes?”

  78. #78
    On August 5th, 2007 at 11:00 pm, purplepeep said:

    Of course, the local police could have fallen for a CAIR trap; load up a car with a couple of Muslims with a bunch of cherry bombs and have them violate a minor traffic law so they’d get stopped.

    Fireworks are illegal in many states but it’s no big deal, mostly punishable by fines.

    At any rate, the reporting on this story is beyond awful, so it’s hard to go by what the media has said. The local ABC affiliate seems inept.

    have to wait til the morn to see how this all shakes out.

  79. #79
    On August 6th, 2007 at 6:52 am, TMoney said:

    Two words: Lawsuit pending.

  80. #80
    On August 6th, 2007 at 10:37 am, DJM said:

    Two Middle Eastern Muslim men with a bomb and you lot automatically assume they are terrorists. Sheesh, talk about Islamophobia…

    /sarc

  81. #81
    On August 6th, 2007 at 7:39 pm, Lindsay said:
  82. #82
    On August 6th, 2007 at 9:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Profiling…ah…So
    Yeah Lindsay and False Arrest!
    Pahhhhhleeeeeezzzzzzzz

  83. #83
    On August 17th, 2007 at 11:32 pm, trinitytim said:

    Today, the Charleston Post and Courier reported that the FBI has issued a press release urgin Americans to withhold judgement in the SC case as the charges of possessing explosives may not be true.

    The link is http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/aug/17/fbi_backs_off_arrests13265/

    Something’s not right here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Remember those fiberglass drug subs?

July 18, 2008 02:04 AM by see-dubya

29 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Run silent, run shallow.

Homeland Security report: African human-smuggling rings could bring terrorists over the border

July 10, 2008 01:00 PM by see-dubya

31 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

PLUS: The new Danish cartoons–French pornography!

DHS researching electric-shock bracelets to subdue airline terrorists (UPDATE: DHS denial)

July 9, 2008 05:53 PM by see-dubya

49 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Look, I’m fine with just taking my shoes off, okay?

Narcoterrorists. I hate these guys.

July 5, 2008 02:34 PM by see-dubya

24 Comments | 1 Trackback

Precursors to terror. Plus a similar case in Mexico.

Spinning the Bush wiretap ruling

July 3, 2008 01:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Secrets and lies.

Bolton drops A-bomb on Bush’s North Korea deal

June 30, 2008 12:10 AM by see-dubya

31 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

“…the ineffable sadness of an American presidency… in total intellectual collapse.”

Relax, border hawks…Virtual Fence 2.0 is on the way!

June 25, 2008 07:44 AM by see-dubya

30 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Be still my beating heart…

Democrat less wrong than usual about nuclear proliferation

June 20, 2008 06:10 AM by see-dubya

27 Comments | 1 Trackback

But still wrong.


Categories: Goose Creek, Homeland Security