About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Fed up with Lindsey Grahamnesty

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 7, 2007 03:46 PM

Some of Sen. Grahamnesty’s constituents show their disapproval:

Monday night’s Greenville GOP executive committee’s censure of Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham shows that “grassroots activists…are thoroughly fed up with” him, Samuel Harms, county party chairman, said this morning. Graham was censured for his support of an immigration bill and comments later made to a Hispanic civil rights organization.

Of course, they are being branded “extremists:”

Rick Beltram, Spartanburg County GOP chairman, is skeptical of any long-term impact on Graham.

“This was a small group of extremist Republicans who wanted to have a voice and in an emotional moment, blurted it out,” he said.

Emotional moment? No, this is an emotional moment. And this is an emotional moment.

Graham’s Johnny-come-lately act on immigration enforcement ain’t foolin’ no one.

Posted in: Amnesty

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Grahamnesty censured by SC county’s Republican party
  2. Bill's Bites
  3. Tom’s Big Picture » Blog Archive » Senator Craig’s Control File Leaks Out

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, Brian72 said:

    Reap the whirlwind, “my friends”.

    Maybe we will get more hilarious video of another Grahamnesty hissy-fit, fists pistoning up and down like he’s a toddler refusing that yucky medicine! Hahaha!

  2. #2
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, thirteen28 said:

    Graham’s Johnny-come-lately act on immigration enforcement ain’t foolin’ no one.

    You got that right!! After telling us over and over how border enforcement was impossible without a “comprehensive” (cough amnesty cough) solution, we’re suddenly supposed to believe that now he’s on the enforcement-first bandwagon?

    Even though he says he’s on the right side of the issue now, it’s just a matter of political expediency after realizing how badly he misread his constituents and the base in general.

    Wondering what all of his (former?) amnesty-lovin’ allies have to say about his sudden change of heart.

  3. #3
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    Sooooooooo….

    a GOP Executive Committee at the local level is extremist for calling for a censure of an alleged GOP politician who breaks from the Conservative philosophy of their constituents is “extremist”.

    But a Democratic Senator from my state puts forth a bill which calls for the censure of GWB, Cheney & Gonzales ( Which I, as his constituent, disagree with ) - and he’s not ‘extremist’?

  4. #4
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, normsrevenge said:

    caught .. on the wrong side of the fence. ouch.

    Life is so unfair sometimes and then sometimes so sweet ..

  5. #5
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, NeoConNews said:

    Ironic that ‘emotional’ would be the term used to describe anyone critical of lamentable Lindsey.

  6. #6
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, bear1909 said:

    Pay the piper, Graham. Accountability is a local deal all the way. Prima donas like Graham get to Washington and lose their minds.

    You’d have sworn Graham had found a second calling when it comes to Shamnesty legislation.

    What I wonder is why he never asked the locals if they heard that phone ring too?

    NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.

  7. #7
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:26 pm, jferg49 said:

    Graham…that cracker!….he is like many of those crooked rascals we elect…they become untouchable…voting them out is all we can do…Graham needs to leave the party…we deserve better….oh wait…but I’m way to extreme…sorry…

  8. #8
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, DesertLover said:

    Anyone want a glass of milk with that Graham Cracker? …

  9. #9
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:41 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    I guess we’er all extremists here in the upstate of SC too. During the shamnesty debate I honestly heard talk of lynching the twerp.The elites who still support the traitor are in for a shock come Noveber.Rick Beltram may be looking for a new gig too if he dosen’t keep his stupid trap shut.

  10. #10
    On August 7th, 2007 at 4:44 pm, USMCgramma said:

    We live in the overtaxed and corrupt state of NC, but the influx of new residents is challenging the Democrat stranglehold. John Edwards was NOT re-elected to the Senate! Our neighbors in SC have spoken out against one of their own party … further evidence that the South is no longer interested in politics-as-usual!

  11. #11
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, Bruce said:

    Graham thinks he has enough money to get re-elected even though he has betrayed & humiliated us. I have promised him that I will do everything within my power to promote his defeat. Surely the people of South Carolina have enough self respect to turn Graham out of office. It’s a matter of principle: anyone but Graham.

  12. #12
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, raybury said:

    When I read this, I wondered, What “Hispanic civil rights organization”?

    Well, no, I didn’t really. From the article: “[County GOP chairman] Harms referred to remarks attributed to Graham at the annual meeting of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights and advocacy organization.”

    Does anyone know of any mainstream newspaper that refers to a white supremacist group as a “civil rights and advocacy organization”?

  13. #13
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:09 pm, Chief RZ said:

    I supported Lindsay over his democratic liberal opponent as well as Jim Demint. I will patiently wait for his explanation. Maybe this local reaction will add a dose of reality. We are fed up with Illegal, criminal aliens killing our good citizens and then getting off, or running away scot-free.

  14. #14
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:10 pm, MikeB said:

    Definition of “grass rooter” whatever the issue your goal is to NEVER, EVER COMPROMISE. You are elected to do nothing, because to do something means you may actually pass a law that is not perfect in every possible way.

    If any Democrat (but Joe Liberman) votes with you, you are a sell-out and should be censured or worse.

    Now why do all of you keep telling me that liberals are childish?

  15. #15
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, Insomniac said:

    Re: #13

    Ah…ahhh…..AHHCHOOO!!!!

    Sorry, strawmen make me sneeze.

  16. #16
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:19 pm, leepro said:

    Following a series of interconnected links from this page, I ran across this at MinutemenProject.com. This is a NEW one, folks.

    U.S. border cop charged with murdering Mexican
    Dateline Aug. 7, 1007 (Reuters)

    [snip]

    Agent Nicholas Corbett was charged in April with four counts of homicide in the January 12 shooting of Francisco Dominguez Rivera shortly after he crossed the border illegally on a stretch of desert between Douglas and Naco.

    [snip]

    Four counts of homicide for one shooting? I’d like to know just how creative they’re going to get in “law” enforcement!

  17. #17
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:26 pm, Jarhead said:

    I can still see Sen. Lindsey Graham yuking it up with Sen. Ted Kennedy in that group photo, just before shamesty was defeated. Also remember Lindsey “Goober” Graham wants judicial rights for the prisoners at Gitmo as well as terrorist caught on the battle field. People in SC are not extremists, they are just invoking their God given right. They voted him in they can vote him out. What is this the Roman Senate or the US Senate? Grrrr do not get me going… Term Limits is what we need! If it good enough for our Presidents it’s good enough for the elitist bums!

  18. #18
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:38 pm, coffee said:

    I find US Citizen hating, silent invader loving, give away the country supporters as extremists like Rick Beltram. I’ll bet voters will agree if he would like to wager anything on it.

    **crickets**

    Nah, I didn’t think so.

  19. #19
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    normsrevenge
    “caught .. on the wrong side of the fence. ouch.”

    If there was a fence… ;)

  20. #20
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:52 pm, Brian72 said:

    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    normsrevenge
    “caught .. on the wrong side of the fence. ouch.”

    If there was a fence… ;)

    Yeah, what fence inhumane rights denying environmentally destructive apartheid great wall of America

  21. #21
    On August 7th, 2007 at 5:58 pm, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    Let’s see…censured at home on Monday…I get an email from Grahamnesty on Tuesday morning, touting his tough new stance against illegal immigrants…could there possibly be any connection…?

  22. #22
    On August 7th, 2007 at 6:36 pm, John Ansell said:

    Gramnesty is going to learn from John McCant what happens when you go against your base. The media says that McCant is suffering because of the war but the real reason is scamnesty.

  23. #23
    On August 7th, 2007 at 7:10 pm, Yashmak said:

    re: #22

    Yeah, it’s pretty funny since even McCain has publicly noted that the amnesty legislation had a huge impact on his campaign.

  24. #24
    On August 7th, 2007 at 7:44 pm, Bhishma said:

    Wondering what all of his (former?) amnesty-lovin’ allies have to say about his sudden change of heart.

    After pandering to criminal votes: http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/John_McCain_Immigration.htm Johnny is jumping ship: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QP68K80&show_article=1

  25. #25
    On August 7th, 2007 at 7:47 pm, Jim M. said:

    Ironic how quickly and strongly he has embraced a position which he painted only a few short weeks ago as bigoted, ignorant and extremist.

    I would have a lot more respect for a man who stuck to his beliefs, if in fact there are his beliefs. If there was any doubt before, Graham has made it clear he stands for nothing except self preservation and that he is another spineless elected official with no honor.

  26. #26
    On August 7th, 2007 at 9:48 pm, Speakup said:

    Censure of lawmakers sounds like a great idea, in a national referendum sort of way.

  27. #27
    On August 7th, 2007 at 10:35 pm, Alphonse said:

    Seems like I’m seeing more freshly arrived illegals than ever here in Cheecago, Mexinois.

    Shamnesty defeat notwithstanding, I don’t think there are any changes in Jorge’s open borders policies. “My way or the highway” has been his wont, and I don’t think Jorge really cares much for the American people. From his lofty perch hobnobbing with corporate cronies, the American people are merely overpriced labor.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The return of McAmnesty the Democrat Suck-Up

September 22, 2008 11:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

178 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Shhhhhh.

The GOP platform: Putting face-saving above principle

August 27, 2008 03:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

The capitulation you deserve.

GOP platform fight over shamnesty euphemisms

August 26, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

105 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Crooked talk.

RNC’s new radio ad: McCain’s a bigger Hispanderer than Obama!

August 22, 2008 02:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

203 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

“How do you know someone is a friend?”

Translation: McCain’s suck up to La Raza

July 14, 2008 12:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

My friends.

Shamnesty Republican Chris Cannon defeated in Utah primary

June 25, 2008 02:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

119 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

“You rocked the Republican Party.”

Inside McCain’s closed-door meeting with Chicago Hispanics

June 19, 2008 09:02 PM by Michelle Malkin

413 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Double talk. (Image credit: People’s Cube)


Categories: Amnesty


Marginal Revolution

» Markets in everything?