As a news consumer, stories like this raise an obvious question – why wasn’t this a firing offense? JOE SCARBOROUGH: There was a story out of Seattle, and the reason I love it is that it’s transparency in the news…….

Read it here.

Also, don’t miss: Cheering Rove’s resignation.
…

That’s nothing. Look at this editorial piece regarding Rove. Liberal Media???? Yep, you betcha

I’d have more respect (albeit still not much) for a reporter or editor who wore a Che T-shirt and proudly flaunted his or her leftism than for the current crop who, like Dan Rather, doggedly persist in fostering the illusion that rags like the Seattle Times, the Portland Oregonian or the New York Times are “middle of the road.”

We demand truth-in-advertising from those who sell us products; why not from those who purport to inform us?

While our President’s term is coming to a close, a new election is on the horizon. With his ability and influence, conservative candidates will be beating down his door.

Let the left celebrate all they want. After a short break, Rove will be leading another candidate down the dusty, musty trail.

The question is not when, but who?

I am curious, does anyone here read print media these days? I mean, other than the links from websites, I haven’t seriously read a newspaper in years.

I do subscribe to the Sunday Compost, but that is only for the ads and bird cage liners:-)

The Seattle Times is not the most liberal paper around, but they are bent on destroying the locals by continuously digging dirt (usually unfairly or unfounded) on the great institutions of the PNW such as Boeing, the Univeristy of WA, Starbucks and Microsoft. They even had a reporter get a Pulitzer for a series on the Boeing and the 737 that was filled with errors and outright lies.

The only non-liberal paper in the area recently ceased publication (King County Journal – which included Michelle’s columns), and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is as bad as any paper anywhere.