<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brown like Geraldo, but not down with Geraldo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1ManMilitia</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-132942</link>
		<dc:creator>1ManMilitia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-132942</guid>
		<description>I used to hear alot of jokes about the Lone Ranger and Tonto.

The punch-line was always Tonto saying to the Lone Ranger &quot;Where do you get this &#039;we-sh*t&#039; pale-face?&quot;

Michelle is darker than Fonzie.
I think she should refer to him as
&quot;pale-face&quot;. 
It&#039;s just a thought.
Go Michelle Go</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to hear alot of jokes about the Lone Ranger and Tonto.</p>
<p>The punch-line was always Tonto saying to the Lone Ranger &#8220;Where do you get this &#8216;we-sh*t&#8217; pale-face?&#8221;</p>
<p>Michelle is darker than Fonzie.<br />
I think she should refer to him as<br />
&#8220;pale-face&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s just a thought.<br />
Go Michelle Go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Django</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117949</link>
		<dc:creator>Django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117949</guid>
		<description>What Geraldo Rivera means to me is an instantaneous channel change.  The man is a joke to everyone but the brain trust at Fox News.  

Fox has been sliding downhill for some time now.  The &quot;Hannity &amp; Colmes Show&quot; turned into the &quot;Allen Colmes Hour&quot; several months ago.  And Hannity&#039;s not exactly a genius when he does show up on his own program.

Both Glenn Beck (CNN) and H&amp;C had a feature on Don Imus and immediately opened with interviews with Al Sharpton.  WTF?  I immediately changed channels.  If the &quot;conservative&quot; shows insist on validating and promoting nitwits and con artists like Rivera and Sharpton I&#039;m going to insist on no longer watching their programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Geraldo Rivera means to me is an instantaneous channel change.  The man is a joke to everyone but the brain trust at Fox News.  </p>
<p>Fox has been sliding downhill for some time now.  The &#8220;Hannity &amp; Colmes Show&#8221; turned into the &#8220;Allen Colmes Hour&#8221; several months ago.  And Hannity&#8217;s not exactly a genius when he does show up on his own program.</p>
<p>Both Glenn Beck (CNN) and H&amp;C had a feature on Don Imus and immediately opened with interviews with Al Sharpton.  WTF?  I immediately changed channels.  If the &#8220;conservative&#8221; shows insist on validating and promoting nitwits and con artists like Rivera and Sharpton I&#8217;m going to insist on no longer watching their programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: Americans Want More Accountability In Regard to Illegal Immigration &#124; Political Vindication</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117925</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: Americans Want More Accountability In Regard to Illegal Immigration &#124; Political Vindication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117925</guid>
		<description>[...] Just don&#8217;t try and sell this new data to Geraldo Rivera, he may just libel you as a racist. Oh, and speaking of Jerry Rivers&#8230; Michelle Malkin gives him a well deserved smacking on her site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just don&#8217;t try and sell this new data to Geraldo Rivera, he may just libel you as a racist. Oh, and speaking of Jerry Rivers&#8230; Michelle Malkin gives him a well deserved smacking on her site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian72</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117838</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117838</guid>
		<description>Also, Geraldo is a human approximation of a jacka$$. 

MM-3
GR-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Geraldo is a human approximation of a jacka$$. </p>
<p>MM-3<br />
GR-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian72</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117837</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117837</guid>
		<description>If that man had been deported in 1993, or caught at the border before he got in in the first place, those people would be alive today. Period. Immigration enforcement would have saved them from a murderer who shouldn&#039;t have ever been in America, or at the least deported out of here 15 years ago.

Now that he&#039;s done what he&#039;s done, I hope he gets to meet an American icon, Ol&#039; Sparky. I&#039;ll even let him have my copy of &lt;em&gt;Ride the Lightning&lt;/em&gt;!

For Whom the Bell Tolls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that man had been deported in 1993, or caught at the border before he got in in the first place, those people would be alive today. Period. Immigration enforcement would have saved them from a murderer who shouldn&#8217;t have ever been in America, or at the least deported out of here 15 years ago.</p>
<p>Now that he&#8217;s done what he&#8217;s done, I hope he gets to meet an American icon, Ol&#8217; Sparky. I&#8217;ll even let him have my copy of <em>Ride the Lightning</em>!</p>
<p>For Whom the Bell Tolls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117816</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117816</guid>
		<description>Bear 1909 &amp; 

&lt;blockquote&gt;How can you agree that it is irrelevant and then argue part of the fix is no catch and release.

Gimme a break. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because two people who commit the same crime will, or can, be released on bail.  One is an illegal immigrant and one is not.  You and I would not release the illegal immigrant, (we hold, prosecute and deport upon release) yet it is the judicial system that allows it.  Who is at fault?


 &lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t believe we have a criminal shortage in America, that requiers us importing more&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed.  When an illegal immigrant enters our court system, it is up to the court system to properly deal with the situation.  And, that means holding for prosecution, or deportation.

Listen, there have been born and bred American citizens who have been released on bail that have gone on to commit further crimes.  It wasn&#039;t the first time and it won&#039;t be the last.

One more time, it is the court system that screwed this up.  The court system doesn&#039;t take holding illegal immigrants seriously because the Federal Government only gives it a wink and nod.

How much would you set bail for a mass murderer?  Would you release a mass murderer on their own recognizance?  If the court does it, then who is at fault if the mass murderer goes own to kill some more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bear 1909 &amp; </p>
<blockquote><p>How can you agree that it is irrelevant and then argue part of the fix is no catch and release.</p>
<p>Gimme a break. </p></blockquote>
<p>Because two people who commit the same crime will, or can, be released on bail.  One is an illegal immigrant and one is not.  You and I would not release the illegal immigrant, (we hold, prosecute and deport upon release) yet it is the judicial system that allows it.  Who is at fault?</p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t believe we have a criminal shortage in America, that requiers us importing more</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  When an illegal immigrant enters our court system, it is up to the court system to properly deal with the situation.  And, that means holding for prosecution, or deportation.</p>
<p>Listen, there have been born and bred American citizens who have been released on bail that have gone on to commit further crimes.  It wasn&#8217;t the first time and it won&#8217;t be the last.</p>
<p>One more time, it is the court system that screwed this up.  The court system doesn&#8217;t take holding illegal immigrants seriously because the Federal Government only gives it a wink and nod.</p>
<p>How much would you set bail for a mass murderer?  Would you release a mass murderer on their own recognizance?  If the court does it, then who is at fault if the mass murderer goes own to kill some more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Newark case update: More arrests, more &#8220;undocumented&#8221; criminals</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117810</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Newark case update: More arrests, more &#8220;undocumented&#8221; criminals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117810</guid>
		<description>[...] have been more arrests  in the Newark execution murders. Guess where they were headed? Geraldo thinks it&#8217;s &#8220;irrelevant.&#8221; Law enforcement officials, fortunately, took the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been more arrests  in the Newark execution murders. Guess where they were headed? Geraldo thinks it&#8217;s &#8220;irrelevant.&#8221; Law enforcement officials, fortunately, took the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dandapani</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dandapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117795</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jerry Rivers&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jerry Rivers&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117738</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117738</guid>
		<description>When I watch Kirsten on the Factor, she looks like she just got called to the Principal&#039;s office. I mean yes, please sit up straight but she doesn&#039;t look comfortable.

Is it me or have the Democrats on Fox News, look like they all woke up last week. I wondered if they didn&#039;t get a memo from either Fox News or the DNC. I know Alan Colmes, was on vacation, his fill ins seemed I don&#039;t know the right word &quot;Alert&quot; and leaning forward. Even Greta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I watch Kirsten on the Factor, she looks like she just got called to the Principal&#8217;s office. I mean yes, please sit up straight but she doesn&#8217;t look comfortable.</p>
<p>Is it me or have the Democrats on Fox News, look like they all woke up last week. I wondered if they didn&#8217;t get a memo from either Fox News or the DNC. I know Alan Colmes, was on vacation, his fill ins seemed I don&#8217;t know the right word &#8220;Alert&#8221; and leaning forward. Even Greta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Conservative_Cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Conservative_Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117697</guid>
		<description>drillanwr,

No one else has said it so it seems someone should: if that was your artwork of Jerry Rivers, you did a solid, professional-league caricature of the man, which is quite an accomplishment, because it tends to be tough to do a caricature of a caricature.

In terms of the Fox line-up, one gets the vague impression that well-meaning suits in ivory towers (I&#039;ve known many and they aren&#039;t necessarily bad people even if you need binoculars to see the wet bar on the other side of the office) have decided that they are going to make the same mistake countless conservative candidates made when dealing with liberals: they are going to prove to liberals that they&#039;re fair by putting more liberal voices on air. What they fail to understand besides the folly of alienating their core demographic is that liberals don&#039;t care if you put more liberals on - once you&#039;re a bad guy, you&#039;re a bad guy to them forever. Logic, rational numbers - nothing matters to them except feelings, melodrama and the pursuit of some abstract, undefined manifestation of victory. Having Jerry Rivers around in his current incarnation - that of illegal alien murderer apologist, makes no more sense than having Mike B did to give this website &quot;diversity&quot;, with one caveat - Geraldo is so uttery and totally biased toward his ethnic brethren and prejudiced against anyone who questions that blind loyalty that he does a good job, being a recognizable name, of illustrating just how off-the-wall and irresponsible some people with power to sway millions can be.

Here is the new Fox lineup via the Conservative Cat programming department, all times eastern:

6PM: Britt&#039;s show, badly needs updated CGI title graphics, but more in the current style, and less in the style of the programs which follow it, which are all beginning to look too similar to each other. A weekly segment on Fridays added: a single segment recapping the political world with Newt Gingrich and Jerry Brown - both quiet speakers who don&#039;t interrupt each other, on opposite sides of the spectrum but not afraid to buck their party&#039;s talking points. In other words, an intellectually honest political discussion (though Newt would clean Brown&#039;s clock regularly, at least it would be a nice, civil cleaning)

7:00 PM Shep&#039;s newscast just as it is. Not broken, don&#039;t fix it.

8:00 PM: O&#039;Reilly Factor - drop the embarrasingly ridiculous body language segment (&quot;well, his brow was wrinkled and the sides of hios mouth turned down, and that tells me that he wasn&#039;t happy&quot; - no kidding), and ease up on the beautiful women a bit. Everyone likes a pretty face, but it&#039;s beginning to look like he&#039;s broadcasting from the Playboy Mansion, and that hurts the serious news aspects of his show.

9:00 H&amp;C. Honestly, there should be something like a boxing ring bell every time one person interrupts another. No longer my cup of tea but the show is what it is, and it&#039;s tough to improve it without replacing it because the flaws of the show are built irrevocably into the construction. Beginning to look anemic, I doubt it will last another 4 years, but this programming list won&#039;t replace it just yet.

10:00 PM Michelle Malkin Now. No, Kirsten Powers should not be her version of Colms - Michelle handles the show on her own quite well enough. Nightly segments include immigration and political hypocracy, but we already know that. Greta get&#039;s Geraldo&#039;s sat spot and he moves on to monthly hour specials where he can feel important while taking up less time on the stage. Or perhaps Greta could do something in the late morning to mid-afternoon, where her middle to slightly left, female perspective and sensationalistic ambulance-chasing story topics would play very well with the daytime TV crowd. She&#039;s good at what she does, but playing at the wrong hour. The Cat predicts that putting her up against the View would yield extremely surprising ratings numbers as counter-programming: same topics only presented in a format opposite of the View for people who like the subjects but hate the View, and will continue to hate the show now that Whoopie &quot;Rosie Light&quot; Goldberg is on board.

2:00 AM: Red Eye goes away. Nice people, meaningless show which would have played well in 1985, but the too-loose, ultra aren&#039;t-we-stupid shtick is just plain old now. Interesting, creative general concept, terrible execution.

Weekend: Half-Hour News Hour is halfway there. A couple of extra writers with a fresher style and a budget increase of 10 - 20 percent (alot I know but the cheapness is evident)puts this one solidly on the map and drives liberals insane. 

Want a Fox lineup that&#039;ll bring you back to the TV? That, generally speaking, would be my initial response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drillanwr,</p>
<p>No one else has said it so it seems someone should: if that was your artwork of Jerry Rivers, you did a solid, professional-league caricature of the man, which is quite an accomplishment, because it tends to be tough to do a caricature of a caricature.</p>
<p>In terms of the Fox line-up, one gets the vague impression that well-meaning suits in ivory towers (I&#8217;ve known many and they aren&#8217;t necessarily bad people even if you need binoculars to see the wet bar on the other side of the office) have decided that they are going to make the same mistake countless conservative candidates made when dealing with liberals: they are going to prove to liberals that they&#8217;re fair by putting more liberal voices on air. What they fail to understand besides the folly of alienating their core demographic is that liberals don&#8217;t care if you put more liberals on &#8211; once you&#8217;re a bad guy, you&#8217;re a bad guy to them forever. Logic, rational numbers &#8211; nothing matters to them except feelings, melodrama and the pursuit of some abstract, undefined manifestation of victory. Having Jerry Rivers around in his current incarnation &#8211; that of illegal alien murderer apologist, makes no more sense than having Mike B did to give this website &#8220;diversity&#8221;, with one caveat &#8211; Geraldo is so uttery and totally biased toward his ethnic brethren and prejudiced against anyone who questions that blind loyalty that he does a good job, being a recognizable name, of illustrating just how off-the-wall and irresponsible some people with power to sway millions can be.</p>
<p>Here is the new Fox lineup via the Conservative Cat programming department, all times eastern:</p>
<p>6PM: Britt&#8217;s show, badly needs updated CGI title graphics, but more in the current style, and less in the style of the programs which follow it, which are all beginning to look too similar to each other. A weekly segment on Fridays added: a single segment recapping the political world with Newt Gingrich and Jerry Brown &#8211; both quiet speakers who don&#8217;t interrupt each other, on opposite sides of the spectrum but not afraid to buck their party&#8217;s talking points. In other words, an intellectually honest political discussion (though Newt would clean Brown&#8217;s clock regularly, at least it would be a nice, civil cleaning)</p>
<p>7:00 PM Shep&#8217;s newscast just as it is. Not broken, don&#8217;t fix it.</p>
<p>8:00 PM: O&#8217;Reilly Factor &#8211; drop the embarrasingly ridiculous body language segment (&#8221;well, his brow was wrinkled and the sides of hios mouth turned down, and that tells me that he wasn&#8217;t happy&#8221; &#8211; no kidding), and ease up on the beautiful women a bit. Everyone likes a pretty face, but it&#8217;s beginning to look like he&#8217;s broadcasting from the Playboy Mansion, and that hurts the serious news aspects of his show.</p>
<p>9:00 H&amp;C. Honestly, there should be something like a boxing ring bell every time one person interrupts another. No longer my cup of tea but the show is what it is, and it&#8217;s tough to improve it without replacing it because the flaws of the show are built irrevocably into the construction. Beginning to look anemic, I doubt it will last another 4 years, but this programming list won&#8217;t replace it just yet.</p>
<p>10:00 PM Michelle Malkin Now. No, Kirsten Powers should not be her version of Colms &#8211; Michelle handles the show on her own quite well enough. Nightly segments include immigration and political hypocracy, but we already know that. Greta get&#8217;s Geraldo&#8217;s sat spot and he moves on to monthly hour specials where he can feel important while taking up less time on the stage. Or perhaps Greta could do something in the late morning to mid-afternoon, where her middle to slightly left, female perspective and sensationalistic ambulance-chasing story topics would play very well with the daytime TV crowd. She&#8217;s good at what she does, but playing at the wrong hour. The Cat predicts that putting her up against the View would yield extremely surprising ratings numbers as counter-programming: same topics only presented in a format opposite of the View for people who like the subjects but hate the View, and will continue to hate the show now that Whoopie &#8220;Rosie Light&#8221; Goldberg is on board.</p>
<p>2:00 AM: Red Eye goes away. Nice people, meaningless show which would have played well in 1985, but the too-loose, ultra aren&#8217;t-we-stupid shtick is just plain old now. Interesting, creative general concept, terrible execution.</p>
<p>Weekend: Half-Hour News Hour is halfway there. A couple of extra writers with a fresher style and a budget increase of 10 &#8211; 20 percent (alot I know but the cheapness is evident)puts this one solidly on the map and drives liberals insane. </p>
<p>Want a Fox lineup that&#8217;ll bring you back to the TV? That, generally speaking, would be my initial response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DubiousD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117691</link>
		<dc:creator>DubiousD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117691</guid>
		<description>The thing of it is, if Glenn Beck talked trash this way about Lou Dobbs, how much longer would Beck still be employed by CNN?  Tucker Carlson got booted off CNN for far less.  Heck, even Laurence &quot;Creepy Liar&quot; O&#039;Donnell got put on temporary sabbatical by MSNBC after the way he went off on John O&#039;Neill. 

Isn&#039;t Geraldo worthy of the same treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing of it is, if Glenn Beck talked trash this way about Lou Dobbs, how much longer would Beck still be employed by CNN?  Tucker Carlson got booted off CNN for far less.  Heck, even Laurence &#8220;Creepy Liar&#8221; O&#8217;Donnell got put on temporary sabbatical by MSNBC after the way he went off on John O&#8217;Neill. </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t Geraldo worthy of the same treatment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117686</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117686</guid>
		<description>leepro,

You might have to email someone, I know when I email Spud at insidecablenews.com he will get back to me, if he knows the answer, he shares.

The last time I checked the Rivera vs Malkin blog, on insidecablenews.com the comments were all lined up on Michelle&#039;s side, it is difficult for average people, to argue with common sense. I think you need a law degree to twist this issue into something more complicated then it is. 

Laree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leepro,</p>
<p>You might have to email someone, I know when I email Spud at insidecablenews.com he will get back to me, if he knows the answer, he shares.</p>
<p>The last time I checked the Rivera vs Malkin blog, on insidecablenews.com the comments were all lined up on Michelle&#8217;s side, it is difficult for average people, to argue with common sense. I think you need a law degree to twist this issue into something more complicated then it is. </p>
<p>Laree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117680</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117680</guid>
		<description>Just got back from dinner ,and clicked onto Hot Air.Imagine my shock at seeing Silky whining about Ann.He must be trying to raise funds for another $1200.00 hair cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back from dinner ,and clicked onto Hot Air.Imagine my shock at seeing Silky whining about Ann.He must be trying to raise funds for another $1200.00 hair cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117670</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117670</guid>
		<description>Blues, I stopped watching Greta ever since it turned into &quot;ON the Milk Carton.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blues, I stopped watching Greta ever since it turned into &#8220;ON the Milk Carton.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bour3</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/comment-page-2/#comment-117664</link>
		<dc:creator>bour3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/17/brown-like-geraldo-but-not-down-with-geraldo/#comment-117664</guid>
		<description>Lindasy ^^^ beat me to it.   Except &quot;&#039;immediately&quot; is a bit slow.  Fox is getting more and more difficult to watch.  Geraldo lost me waaaay back there when he said, to Malkin I believe but I&#039;m not positive, that Mexicans were &quot;lured&quot; here by our relaxed border policy and the availability of jobs.  Nothing at all about the &quot;push&quot; of corrupt [M.] government, ridiculous [M.] economic  policy that discourages foreign investment, and ... etc.  Of course our neighbors, lovely people all, have the dreadful gringos to blame for all their ills, thus the adage, &quot;Poor Mexico; so far from God, so near the U.S.&quot;

I love Mexico.  Would consider living there, were I able to bequeath my house and if it didn&#039;t have to be repurchased  all over again in 60 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindasy ^^^ beat me to it.   Except &#8220;&#8216;immediately&#8221; is a bit slow.  Fox is getting more and more difficult to watch.  Geraldo lost me waaaay back there when he said, to Malkin I believe but I&#8217;m not positive, that Mexicans were &#8220;lured&#8221; here by our relaxed border policy and the availability of jobs.  Nothing at all about the &#8220;push&#8221; of corrupt [M.] government, ridiculous [M.] economic  policy that discourages foreign investment, and &#8230; etc.  Of course our neighbors, lovely people all, have the dreadful gringos to blame for all their ills, thus the adage, &#8220;Poor Mexico; so far from God, so near the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love Mexico.  Would consider living there, were I able to bequeath my house and if it didn&#8217;t have to be repurchased  all over again in 60 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
