See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Bill's Bites
2. A fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart : thought cops
3. Neocon News

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On August 27th, 2007 at 6:25 pm, puhiawa said:

   MSM=Muslim Sympathy Media

2. #2
   On August 27th, 2007 at 6:27 pm, Snooper said:

   “…Does the United States Government have the right to conduct secret surveillance of terrorism suspects on American soil? …”

   Naturally, no. We should just let them come and go as they please and after they blow up a few things and kill a bunch of people, again, we should ask them nicely what we can do to placate them and see just how far we should bend over all in the name of PC.

   Deport them all at the end of a bayonet.

   I still have mine and it is quite sharp.

   This DAV is way passed Sick and Tired of this PC garbage.

   There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim.

3. #3
   On August 27th, 2007 at 6:27 pm, Snooper said:

   AMEN to #1!!

4. #4
   On August 27th, 2007 at 6:42 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Oregon, Ninth Circuit, the usual suspects. One would assume SCOTUS would rule for the government. I’m with Snooper here, the idea that someone would even ask if the government has the right to watch terrorist suspects is stupefying.

5. #5
   On August 27th, 2007 at 7:13 pm, Heartland Perspective said:

   The names and affiliated news organizations of each reporter seen walking away from the government lawyer should be publicized. Let’s get this bias front and center.

   Great job of reporting by Zombie.

6. #6
   On August 27th, 2007 at 7:43 pm, geminicontender said:

   With the Ninth Circuit we’ve lost already. Liberal lap-lickers.

7. #8
   On August 27th, 2007 at 9:26 pm, bvw said:

   Creepy, the lawyer from Death Inc. argues for the plantiff. What does he want us all Schiavo’ed?

8. #9
   On August 27th, 2007 at 9:34 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

   I have heard about 5th column activities before, but this terrorist group even has me on edge.

9. #11
   On August 28th, 2007 at 12:02 am, Alphonse said:

   The root problem is chamberpot immigration.

   I see no chance of ending chamberpot immigration. Indeed, the government will probably bring in 100-200 million more chamberpot immigrants in the next twenty years.

   The question then becomes do we want freedom or security? The sheeple seem inclined to security over freedom.

10. #12
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:28 am, greenLibertarian said:

    Interesting case.

    It is unfortunate that the Congress did not expeditiously grant and let stay in force clear and strong rights to surveil foreign nationals, after 9-11, in addition to Patriot Act rights, and enact harsh punishments to those who leak secrets about our surveillance programs and other counter-terrorist programs (NY Times). But I don’t know such law well: perhaps The NYT could have charged with treason or something similar?

11. #13
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:57 am, rightside said:

    I read this the other day over from over at LGF. Does anyone have a guess, as to which way the 9th circuit will rule on this case?

    Heads up, SCOTUS.

12. #14
    On August 29th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Great post. The terrorists use our laws to further their agenda. Why does the United States government not round up these terrorists, and give them a firing squad? Just asking.